I like discussing them. But, yeah, i get what you're saying. I can totally understand why people hate doing it.cutuphalfdead wrote:There are exceptions, of course. What I should have said was: One of the most cringe inducing things is listening to someone analyze Pearl Jam lyrics.durdencommatyler wrote:More than the lyrics themselves, it's how they marry with the song. There are plenty of simple or maybe even wonky lyrics that I love because they work so well in the context of the song. The Beatles are guilty of this quite often.cutuphalfdead wrote:To me, one of the most cringe inducing things is listening to someone analyze rock lyrics.Birds in Hell wrote:I don't know, I think looking for meaning in rock lyrics is a fool's errand. I think of vocals as an instrument in themselves: the sounds being made by the voice is what really matters, not what words are being sung.
Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
- stupidmop
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2796
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Dumb get right/ big wave lyrics are fine with me. Its when they're either overly sentimental or trying to be deep and (to me)failing thats its a problem.
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
His wife and family seem to be the subject matter for future days. Wives and families, while nice, bore me as subject matter for Pearl Jam songs. Is this really such an offensive stance to take?LetMeSleep wrote:But she as a model has never been subject matter for him. He has always had love songs. Did Oceans or Wishlist bother you?verb_to_trust wrote:I don't care that hes married to someone hot and much taller than him, I just think its boring subject matter for a Pearl Jam song.harmless wrote:Is that it? He's abandoned all his principles by marrying someone who models underwear for a living?verb_to_trust wrote:Or maybe if I was one rolled up in blood.harmless wrote:I don't give a shit whether he's 50 and rich, or his wife is a model. Being married and having kids is fucking wonderful and I don't mind if he sings about it. The experience isn't less true because he's rich and his wife is a model. Maybe you'd feel differently if you were a model.verb_to_trust wrote:He's boring an uninteresting to me as a person, that's all. Its not his fault. Younger Eddie was at least interesting. Its okay to fake it through some lyrics at 50 if it means we don't have to listen to love songs to his model wife and kids.harmless wrote:What makes you think he'll suddenly come up with new and interesting things to say after the last two albums? I really wish people would stop bringing up the rich 50 year old family man crap.verb_to_trust wrote:I'm not interested in a rich 50 year old family man's self references. I think the better choice would be to dream up some interesting things to say rather than Future Days type subject matter. Hopefully we get more of that...harmless wrote:He's "too boring" and yet you want him to make "interesting shit" up? Good luck with that.verb_to_trust wrote:Ed is too boring to be self referencing. Make some interesting shit up, I say.WtOB? wrote:and i don't want him to go there again. jg was awful. much worse than inside job.harmless wrote:Ed has always self-referenced. I'm OK with it. I'd rather that than him trying to write something with a new subject. Johnny Guitar is the furthest he got.
If Ed self-references, he can only be as boring as the original songs imo. Anything that self-references my favourite PJ songs is at least worth giving a go. I also think Johnny Guitar was the best song on Backspacer, but it was most definitely a witty pop song and I wouldn't want it to represent Pearl Jam.
Dick/Balls
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Pretty much, yeah.harmless wrote:We are obviously talking within a certain skill level with PJ lyrics. But it reached its peak at Vitalogy and stayed good till Riot Act. Rock is rock. As long as lyrics don't embarrass me they're OK.durdencommatyler wrote:More than the lyrics themselves, it's how they marry with the song. There are plenty of simple or maybe even wonky lyrics that I love because they work so well in the context of the song. The Beatles are guilty of this quite often.cutuphalfdead wrote:To me, one of the most cringe inducing things is listening to someone analyze rock lyrics.Birds in Hell wrote:I don't know, I think looking for meaning in rock lyrics is a fool's errand. I think of vocals as an instrument in themselves: the sounds being made by the voice is what really matters, not what words are being sung.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
really cool ambient noise, thoughverb_to_trust wrote:I don't get what why everyone is splooshing over that. Its just ambient noise. It will be a nice lead in to one of these tracks I'm thinking, maybe Sirens. If it is included, it will be a good sign for this album because its nowhere near cheesy sounding enough to fit on backspacer and sounded like it had too much depth for Avocado.stip wrote:i have no thoughts whatsoever about what any of these songs are going to sound like other than the three we've heard. One of these songs damn well better feature that awesome music from the tour vid, though
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- philpritchard
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
I think they have some lyrics that are genuinely worth analyzing.cutuphalfdead wrote:There are exceptions, of course. What I should have said was: One of the most cringe inducing things is listening to someone analyze Pearl Jam lyrics.durdencommatyler wrote:More than the lyrics themselves, it's how they marry with the song. There are plenty of simple or maybe even wonky lyrics that I love because they work so well in the context of the song. The Beatles are guilty of this quite often.cutuphalfdead wrote:To me, one of the most cringe inducing things is listening to someone analyze rock lyrics.Birds in Hell wrote:I don't know, I think looking for meaning in rock lyrics is a fool's errand. I think of vocals as an instrument in themselves: the sounds being made by the voice is what really matters, not what words are being sung.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Birds in Hell wrote:The music of Inside Job isn't bad.
And I mean, really, who cares about lyrics? They're just words.
sure, in the same way that music is just notes.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Maybe they are, I don't know. But when I open a guided tour thread I just want to puke.philpritchard wrote:I think they have some lyrics that are genuinely worth analyzing.cutuphalfdead wrote:There are exceptions, of course. What I should have said was: One of the most cringe inducing things is listening to someone analyze Pearl Jam lyrics.durdencommatyler wrote:More than the lyrics themselves, it's how they marry with the song. There are plenty of simple or maybe even wonky lyrics that I love because they work so well in the context of the song. The Beatles are guilty of this quite often.cutuphalfdead wrote:To me, one of the most cringe inducing things is listening to someone analyze rock lyrics.Birds in Hell wrote:I don't know, I think looking for meaning in rock lyrics is a fool's errand. I think of vocals as an instrument in themselves: the sounds being made by the voice is what really matters, not what words are being sung.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Not offensive, but maybe a bit naive.verb_to_trust wrote:His wife and family seem to be the subject matter for future days. Wives and families, while nice, bore me as subject matter for Pearl Jam songs. Is this really such an offensive stance to take?LetMeSleep wrote:But she as a model has never been subject matter for him. He has always had love songs. Did Oceans or Wishlist bother you?verb_to_trust wrote:I don't care that hes married to someone hot and much taller than him, I just think its boring subject matter for a Pearl Jam song.harmless wrote:Is that it? He's abandoned all his principles by marrying someone who models underwear for a living?verb_to_trust wrote:Or maybe if I was one rolled up in blood.harmless wrote:I don't give a shit whether he's 50 and rich, or his wife is a model. Being married and having kids is fucking wonderful and I don't mind if he sings about it. The experience isn't less true because he's rich and his wife is a model. Maybe you'd feel differently if you were a model.verb_to_trust wrote:He's boring an uninteresting to me as a person, that's all. Its not his fault. Younger Eddie was at least interesting. Its okay to fake it through some lyrics at 50 if it means we don't have to listen to love songs to his model wife and kids.harmless wrote:What makes you think he'll suddenly come up with new and interesting things to say after the last two albums? I really wish people would stop bringing up the rich 50 year old family man crap.verb_to_trust wrote:I'm not interested in a rich 50 year old family man's self references. I think the better choice would be to dream up some interesting things to say rather than Future Days type subject matter. Hopefully we get more of that...harmless wrote:He's "too boring" and yet you want him to make "interesting shit" up? Good luck with that.verb_to_trust wrote:Ed is too boring to be self referencing. Make some interesting shit up, I say.WtOB? wrote:and i don't want him to go there again. jg was awful. much worse than inside job.harmless wrote:Ed has always self-referenced. I'm OK with it. I'd rather that than him trying to write something with a new subject. Johnny Guitar is the furthest he got.
If Ed self-references, he can only be as boring as the original songs imo. Anything that self-references my favourite PJ songs is at least worth giving a go. I also think Johnny Guitar was the best song on Backspacer, but it was most definitely a witty pop song and I wouldn't want it to represent Pearl Jam.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
I think it sounds good toostip wrote:really cool ambient noise, thoughverb_to_trust wrote:I don't get what why everyone is splooshing over that. Its just ambient noise. It will be a nice lead in to one of these tracks I'm thinking, maybe Sirens. If it is included, it will be a good sign for this album because its nowhere near cheesy sounding enough to fit on backspacer and sounded like it had too much depth for Avocado.stip wrote:i have no thoughts whatsoever about what any of these songs are going to sound like other than the three we've heard. One of these songs damn well better feature that awesome music from the tour vid, though
Last edited by verb_to_trust on Sat August 31, 2013 1:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Dick/Balls
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Right now just about everyone has envisioned the perfect record in their head. This can only end wellstupidmop wrote:But what if. WHAT IF? We're in that sweetspot before we start hearing snippets and descriptions, where anything is possible.WtOB? wrote:yeah, i'm thinking it was just something they noodled with in the studio and used it for a tour vid; like they always do with that kinda stuff. they never put it on the records. unfortunately.verb_to_trust wrote:I don't get what why everyone is splooshing over that. Its just ambient noise. It will be a nice lead in to one of these tracks I'm thinking, maybe Sirens. If it is included, it will be a good sign for this album because its nowhere near cheesy sounding enough to fit on backspacer and sounded like it had too much depth for Avocado.stip wrote:i have no thoughts whatsoever about what any of these songs are going to sound like other than the three we've heard. One of these songs damn well better feature that awesome music from the tour vid, though
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
harmless wrote:Not offensive, but maybe a bit naive.verb_to_trust wrote:His wife and family seem to be the subject matter for future days. Wives and families, while nice, bore me as subject matter for Pearl Jam songs. Is this really such an offensive stance to take?LetMeSleep wrote:But she as a model has never been subject matter for him. He has always had love songs. Did Oceans or Wishlist bother you?verb_to_trust wrote:I don't care that hes married to someone hot and much taller than him, I just think its boring subject matter for a Pearl Jam song.harmless wrote:Is that it? He's abandoned all his principles by marrying someone who models underwear for a living?verb_to_trust wrote:Or maybe if I was one rolled up in blood.harmless wrote:I don't give a shit whether he's 50 and rich, or his wife is a model. Being married and having kids is fucking wonderful and I don't mind if he sings about it. The experience isn't less true because he's rich and his wife is a model. Maybe you'd feel differently if you were a model.verb_to_trust wrote:He's boring an uninteresting to me as a person, that's all. Its not his fault. Younger Eddie was at least interesting. Its okay to fake it through some lyrics at 50 if it means we don't have to listen to love songs to his model wife and kids.harmless wrote:What makes you think he'll suddenly come up with new and interesting things to say after the last two albums? I really wish people would stop bringing up the rich 50 year old family man crap.verb_to_trust wrote:I'm not interested in a rich 50 year old family man's self references. I think the better choice would be to dream up some interesting things to say rather than Future Days type subject matter. Hopefully we get more of that...harmless wrote:He's "too boring" and yet you want him to make "interesting shit" up? Good luck with that.verb_to_trust wrote:Ed is too boring to be self referencing. Make some interesting shit up, I say.WtOB? wrote:and i don't want him to go there again. jg was awful. much worse than inside job.harmless wrote:Ed has always self-referenced. I'm OK with it. I'd rather that than him trying to write something with a new subject. Johnny Guitar is the furthest he got.
If Ed self-references, he can only be as boring as the original songs imo. Anything that self-references my favourite PJ songs is at least worth giving a go. I also think Johnny Guitar was the best song on Backspacer, but it was most definitely a witty pop song and I wouldn't want it to represent Pearl Jam.
Dick/Balls
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84852
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
And when you hear people like Tom Waits or Leonard Cohen, you see how amazing rock lyrics can be. They can be more than just words.stip wrote:Birds in Hell wrote:The music of Inside Job isn't bad.
And I mean, really, who cares about lyrics? They're just words.
sure, in the same way that music is just notes.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
I don't think the lyrics to Get Right are dumb. They're just not serious.stupidmop wrote:Dumb get right/ big wave lyrics are fine with me. Its when they're either overly sentimental or trying to be deep and (to me)failing thats its a problem.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
look, if someone takes the time to bait a line, the least I can do is nibble on itLetMeSleep wrote:My apologies, it looked like Stip baiting.Birds in Hell wrote:It sounds flippant but I do genuinely mean it.LetMeSleep wrote:hahaha too obvious.Birds in Hell wrote:The music of Inside Job isn't bad.
And I mean, really, who cares about lyrics? They're just words.
Lyrics rank somewhere below production choices, snare drum sounds and guitar tone in the things I care about in a song. Unless they're unavoidably terrible to the point where I can't help but notice them (which, admittedly, Inside Job is getting pretty close to) I really don't care that much. They're a pretty minor part of a song to me.
PJs bad lyrics usually don't worry me too much.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
durdencommatyler wrote:And when you hear people like Tom Waits or Leonard Cohen, you see how amazing rock lyrics can be. They can be more than just words.stip wrote:Birds in Hell wrote:The music of Inside Job isn't bad.
And I mean, really, who cares about lyrics? They're just words.
sure, in the same way that music is just notes.
Or Elvis Costello
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
with only a few exceptions backspacer actually had pretty strong lyrics, harmless. GSMF, Johnny Guitar, Amongst the Waves, Speed of Sound, Force of Nature. Those are all well written songs. Parts of just breathe and unthought known are very strong.harmless wrote:Especially these days, because the band isn't a powerhouse anymore, so I wish the lyrics had got stronger to compensate. But it doesn't look like it.WtOB? wrote:lyrics are also more important in some bands than others. in pearl jam, they're definitely an important factor.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
stip wrote:Right now just about everyone has envisioned the perfect record in their head. This can only end wellstupidmop wrote:But what if. WHAT IF? We're in that sweetspot before we start hearing snippets and descriptions, where anything is possible.WtOB? wrote:yeah, i'm thinking it was just something they noodled with in the studio and used it for a tour vid; like they always do with that kinda stuff. they never put it on the records. unfortunately.verb_to_trust wrote:I don't get what why everyone is splooshing over that. Its just ambient noise. It will be a nice lead in to one of these tracks I'm thinking, maybe Sirens. If it is included, it will be a good sign for this album because its nowhere near cheesy sounding enough to fit on backspacer and sounded like it had too much depth for Avocado.stip wrote:i have no thoughts whatsoever about what any of these songs are going to sound like other than the three we've heard. One of these songs damn well better feature that awesome music from the tour vid, though
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
I guess I'm kind of thinking out loud in this thread, because those are artists that absolutely have lyrics worth discussing. I guess I just can't stand the over analysis of lyrics that are good but not that special. Or, most Pearl Jam lyrics.durdencommatyler wrote:And when you hear people like Tom Waits or Leonard Cohen, you see how amazing rock lyrics can be. They can be more than just words.stip wrote:Birds in Hell wrote:The music of Inside Job isn't bad.
And I mean, really, who cares about lyrics? They're just words.
sure, in the same way that music is just notes.
It's like hearing a 12 year old go on and on about Stairway To Heaven.
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37327
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: Lightning Bolt -- guess the tracks!
Maybe I'm just a douche bag.