Boston Red Sox Thread

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

I DISAGREE WITH FIRING DOMBROWSKI
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37453
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Norah »

i can see why it happened but yeah so do i
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

cutuphalfdead wrote:i can see why it happened but yeah so do i
The guy was fired for doing exactly what he was hired to do, gut the farm system in an effort to win to the World Series.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21687
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:i can see why it happened but yeah so do i
The guy was fired for doing exactly what he was hired to do, gut the farm system in an effort to win to the World Series.
This is not a wholly original thought (the guy from Sox Prospects posted something similar this morning), but I guess the rational line of thinking is that he didn't get fired for anything he did, but rather was fired because they didn't think he's the right fit for what comes next--i.e., restocking and developing the farm system, building around a young core without breaking the bank. Like chud said: makes sense even if you don't agree with it.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

Simple Torture wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:i can see why it happened but yeah so do i
The guy was fired for doing exactly what he was hired to do, gut the farm system in an effort to win to the World Series.
This is not a wholly original thought (the guy from Sox Prospects posted something similar this morning), but I guess the rational line of thinking is that he didn't get fired for anything he did, but rather was fired because they didn't think he's the right fit for what comes next--i.e., restocking and developing the farm system, building around a young core without breaking the bank. Like chud said: makes sense even if you don't agree with it.
Yeah, I just dont think they are "there" yet, I feel like there was still another year at least in this group. Seems pretty clear now though that Betts is gone in the offseason, maybe JD as well if he opts out.

Also, I've got a problem with shitcanning a guy that just won the World Series with 3 weeks left in the season. He earned finishing the contract out at least.
Last edited by numbers on Mon September 09, 2019 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

Simple Torture wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:i can see why it happened but yeah so do i
The guy was fired for doing exactly what he was hired to do, gut the farm system in an effort to win to the World Series.
This is not a wholly original thought (the guy from Sox Prospects posted something similar this morning), but I guess the rational line of thinking is that he didn't get fired for anything he did, but rather was fired because they didn't think he's the right fit for what comes next--i.e., restocking and developing the farm system, building around a young core without breaking the bank. Like chud said: makes sense even if you don't agree with it.
That was my first thought, too. It sucks coming less than a year after winning the World Series, but he was hired to go all-in and win it all. He got the job done, but now they can't go anymore all-in than they already have, so the direction has to change.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

The way this has been handled the last 24 is a disgrace.
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22815
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Bammer »

How many GM’s have been fired in major sports the season after a championship (barring any personal scandals)?
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21687
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

Mick, do you feel seen?
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

I personally would like to speak to ownership.
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by 4/5 »

Simple Torture wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:i can see why it happened but yeah so do i
The guy was fired for doing exactly what he was hired to do, gut the farm system in an effort to win to the World Series.
This is not a wholly original thought (the guy from Sox Prospects posted something similar this morning), but I guess the rational line of thinking is that he didn't get fired for anything he did, but rather was fired because they didn't think he's the right fit for what comes next--i.e., restocking and developing the farm system, building around a young core without breaking the bank. Like chud said: makes sense even if you don't agree with it.
I don't understand this. I remember when Dombrowski was the guy who took the Marlins from the '97 fire sale and turned it into the foundation for the '03 champs. Didn't he develop the Tigers farm system and build that team into champs?

(Mind you I haven't followed baseball closely on a day-to-day basis for several years now, so I'm probably missing something--I'm just not sure what.) Why wouldn't you want Dombrowski overseeing your rebuild?
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

4/5 wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
numbers wrote:
cutuphalfdead wrote:i can see why it happened but yeah so do i
The guy was fired for doing exactly what he was hired to do, gut the farm system in an effort to win to the World Series.
This is not a wholly original thought (the guy from Sox Prospects posted something similar this morning), but I guess the rational line of thinking is that he didn't get fired for anything he did, but rather was fired because they didn't think he's the right fit for what comes next--i.e., restocking and developing the farm system, building around a young core without breaking the bank. Like chud said: makes sense even if you don't agree with it.
I don't understand this. I remember when Dombrowski was the guy who took the Marlins from the '97 fire sale and turned it into the foundation for the '03 champs. Didn't he develop the Tigers farm system and build that team into champs?

(Mind you I haven't followed baseball closely on a day-to-day basis for several years now, so I'm probably missing something--I'm just not sure what.) Why wouldn't you want Dombrowski overseeing your rebuild?
The more I think about it, the more I think this move is about slashing as many costs as possible in preparation for a sale.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Mickey »

Lmao #RaysUp
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

Mickey wrote:Lmao #RaysUp
Toutes nos felicitations
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21687
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

They're gonna trade this guy:
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

Simple Torture wrote:They're gonna trade this guy:
Yup, they omitted him from their 2020 ticket advertising.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

I suspect we are entering a dark period with the Red Sox now.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21687
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

numbers wrote:I suspect we are entering a dark period with the Red Sox now.
Say goodbye to your favorite players and oh yeah give us more money:
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

Seriously I will fight these motherfuckers.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

I friend of mine mentioned a scenario to me today: Boston trades David Price and Andrew Benintendi for basically nothing. They use the money saved on the Price contract to sign Betts.

Would you do it?
Post Reply