Election 2020

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply

Vote Before You Can Vote!

Donald Trump (R)
59
44%
Joe Biden (D)
55
41%
Jacob Hornberger (L)
1
1%
Howie Hawkins (G)
1
1%
Other
1
1%
COVID-19
16
12%
 
Total votes: 133

User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Election 2020

Post by BurtReynolds »

96583UP wrote:looking forward to when the outlier Dem candidates are no longer on the debate stage.

when do they up the cutoff requirements?
The only cutoff I want to see are the cut off heads of the leading establishment candidates displayed on pikes outside the charred ruins of DNC headquarters.

#yanggang2020

Image
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29884
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Election 2020

Post by 96583UP »

BurtReynolds wrote:
96583UP wrote:looking forward to when the outlier Dem candidates are no longer on the debate stage.

when do they up the cutoff requirements?
The only cutoff I want to see are the cut off heads of the leading establishment candidates displayed on pikes outside the charred ruins of DNC headquarters.

#yanggang2020

Image
this all sounds pretty great actually

https://www.yang2020.com/what-is-freedom-dividend-faq/

sign me up!

and now with the forced sterilization, i won’t have to pay a deductible for a vasectomy

eugenics is the best form of liberalism!!
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
Rob
Future Drummer
Posts: 2889
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: Election 2020

Post by Rob »

Bi_3 wrote:
“My point is that even as we push the envelope and we are bold in our vision, we also have to be rooted in reality and the fact that voters, including Democratic voters and certainly persuadable independents or even moderate Republicans, are not driven by the same views that are reflected on certain, you know, left-leaning Twitter feeds or the activist wing of our party.”
Obama gets it
This is also from the speech.
“Voters, including Democrats, are not driven by the same views that are reflected on certain left-leaning Twitter feeds, or the activist wing of our party,” he warned. “And that’s not a criticism to the activist wing — their job is to poke and prod and text and inspire and motivate. But the candidate’s job, whoever that ends up being, is to get elected.”

He goes on to say...
It’s a vision that clashes with some on his party’s left, most obviously including supporters of Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren. And while he dismissed the debate between persuading voters and energizing base Democrats as “a false division,” he explained that he’d been thinking about how the candidates have been talking about him on the trail. “I think it is important for candidates to push past what I was able to achieve as president. I wouldn’t run the same campaign today, in this environment, as I ran in 2008, in part because we made enough progress since 2008, of which I am very proud, that it moved what’s possible. So I don’t want people to just revert to what’s safe, I want them to push out and try more, alright? So we got the Affordable Care Act. It was a really good starter home, as I say,” he said. “I don’t want people just standing pat, because we still have millions of people who are uninsured.”

“I don’t take it as a criticism when people say, ‘Hey, that’s great Obama did what he did, and now we want to do more.’ I hope so. That’s the whole point,” he said. “I think it is very important to all the candidates who are running, at every level, to pay some attention to where voters actually are, and how they think about their lives. And I don’t think we should be deluded into thinking that the resistance to certain approaches to things is simply because voters haven’t heard a bold enough proposal, and as soon as they hear a bold enough proposal that’s going to activate them. Because you know what? It turns out people are cautious, because they don’t have a margin for error.”
Obama has always been somewhere between the progressive & moderate, and I think it's wrong for anyone to suggest that he's for/against either side. The full quote was not exactly an endorsement of the safe, moderate approach either.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Election 2020

Post by McParadigm »

(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: Election 2020

Post by bune »

It didn’t occur to you to suggest a party dedicated to smaller govt and vigorous protection of individual liberty. Weird.
How would a small gov't vigorously protect individual liberties? I want to understand and not mock what appear to be contradictory statements.
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Election 2020

Post by BurtReynolds »

bune wrote:
It didn’t occur to you to suggest a party dedicated to smaller govt and vigorous protection of individual liberty. Weird.
How would a small gov't vigorously protect individual liberties? I want to understand and not mock what appear to be contradictory statements.
By staying out of the way.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
bune
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9359
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
Location: Washington State

Re: Election 2020

Post by bune »

That's not vigorous though. That's kind of the opposite of vigorous. Unless they are vigorously staying out of the way?
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Election 2020

Post by BurtReynolds »

Well ideally, from a libertarian perspective, if you are in favor of a government at all, it's one with one purpose: to protect the (negative) rights of the citizenry. That would make it a fraction of the size it is today.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Bi_3
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16452
Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm

Re: Election 2020

Post by Bi_3 »

McParadigm wrote:


So basically Bloomberg is the best option. No kidding
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Election 2020

Post by BurtReynolds »

We need an SNP-like separatist party, only many of them.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Election 2020

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 12:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Election 2020

Post by Mickey »

Honestly one of the worst campaign things I've ever fucking seen, ten times worse than Chillary Clinton.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25049
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Election 2020

Post by B »

My highest level of excitement for a political candidate in my life was, "Well, ... This one's better than that one."
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Election 2020

Post by McParadigm »

Image
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Election 2020

Post by McParadigm »

It’s amazing and, in its way, catastrophic that the democratic electorate looks at 2018 and the 2019 specials and thinks that their best hope is to nominate some kind of moderate who either opposes marijuana legalization and pines for the years that got us here, or who legitimizes Trump (by embracing false narratives, no less) and repeatedly praised the Tea Party.

To be clear: in Kentucky, in Virginia, and in Louisiana, democratic candidate ran primarily on moderate to conservative platforms. They got less of the right-leaning vote than ever. They won because of high liberal turnout, and because of The sweeping liberalization of suburban women…a group that wants massive healthcare reform, massive gun control reform, LGBTQ and women’s rights protections, and a rejection of racism.

Being a moderate was less important to success than motivating Democrat-leaning voters.

IN KENTUCKY.

So of course we’re gonna go with Biden or Pete.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
surfndestroy
Future Drummer
Posts: 2870
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:21 am

Re: Election 2020

Post by surfndestroy »

McParadigm wrote:...and because of The sweeping liberalization of suburban women…a group that wants LGBTQ and women’s rights protections, and a rejection of racism.
Are you so sure about the BTQ part of LGBTQ?
Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Election 2020

Post by McParadigm »

surfndestroy wrote:
McParadigm wrote:...and because of The sweeping liberalization of suburban women…a group that wants LGBTQ and women’s rights protections, and a rejection of racism.
Are you so sure about the BTQ part of LGBTQ?
On the contrary, I suspect that they like and want the language of protections, but that it would take only a small amount of change before they grew fatigued. Nevertheless, for 2019 and 2020 elections, the language of tolerance towards those groups is associatable with increased momentum in suburban districts.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21689
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Election 2020

Post by Simple Torture »

Guys, this could still happen:
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Election 2020

Post by McParadigm »

Joe Biden’s campaign accidentally sent out its “hope I made you proud” fundraising email hours before the debate even starts. Top shelf grandpa work.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Election 2020

Post by BurtReynolds »

HUGE NEWS
RM's resident disinformation expert.
Post Reply