Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 3:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by bodysnatcher »

tragabigzanda wrote:
Strat wrote:They are all a mess for this show but especially McCready. His lead lines are very off the mark and often not even hitting in time.

His rig also sounds awful like he maybe forgot some pedals.
He was also probably really leaning into the H around this time
he was certainly leaning
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16263
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by Birds in Hell »

tragabigzanda wrote:
Strat wrote:They are all a mess for this show but especially McCready. His lead lines are very off the mark and often not even hitting in time.

His rig also sounds awful like he maybe forgot some pedals.
He was also probably really leaning into the H around this time
I didn't think McCready was ever actually into heroin.

I thought it was rampant alcoholism and cocaine.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 3:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42768
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by VinylGuy »

tragabigzanda wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
Strat wrote:They are all a mess for this show but especially McCready. His lead lines are very off the mark and often not even hitting in time.

His rig also sounds awful like he maybe forgot some pedals.
He was also probably really leaning into the H around this time
I didn't think McCready was ever actually into heroin.

I thought it was rampant alcoholism and cocaine.
Could be, I always assumed it was heroin due to his friendship with Layne
never heard or read about Mike doing H.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Didn't Mike say in the book or in the movie he did heroin?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
dad
Posting (live)
Posts: 19163
Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by dad »

I think he said he felt like the heroine of the band.
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil

now when i regular i can promote regularity
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by Strat »

I thought he was just booze and pills.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by bodysnatcher »

Who cares, Mike sucks, Jeff rules
User avatar
joostone
AnalLog
Posts: 1779
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:02 am
Location: Netherlands

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by joostone »

VinylGuy wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
Strat wrote:They are all a mess for this show but especially McCready. His lead lines are very off the mark and often not even hitting in time.

His rig also sounds awful like he maybe forgot some pedals.
He was also probably really leaning into the H around this time
I didn't think McCready was ever actually into heroin.

I thought it was rampant alcoholism and cocaine.
Could be, I always assumed it was heroin due to his friendship with Layne
never heard or read about Mike doing H.
he never did. It was alcohol and cocaine. And in 2000 it was pills.
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

Strat wrote:They are all a mess for this show but especially McCready. His lead lines are very off the mark and often not even hitting in time.

His rig also sounds awful like he maybe forgot some pedals.
Yeah, it's that spitty-farty sound like when the batteries die in your guitar pedal. And it appears intermittently throughout the show too. Horrible.

The poor quality of the "new" songs and the general sloppiness reminds one of a more recent show than something from the Dave A era. Maybe that's why they chose it? LOL
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by Kevin Davis »

liebzz wrote:A fan voted vault release with a number of choices based on what they have that they can master sounds like a great idea.
I would support this idea, but if only if the fans were Spenno, Wendy Carlos's Twin, ridleybradout, and lowlight.

Or me, as this would be the quickest way to expedite the comprehensive box set of Jack Irons-era material I've been dreaming of since the early 2000's.
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10372
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by liebzz »

I mean I could get together a pretty strong list of 9 potential vault shows. I am sure there would be plenty of argument all around. I do agree with Pearl Jam’s selection of the ‘07 vault release from the Vic. That was a great choice. And working this list specifically from what has not been released yet in any form (so excluding the 92 NYE show, the Atlanta 94 show, etc)...

3/6/92 Rotterdam
6/18/92 Zurich
5/13/93 San Francisco
8/14/93 Gimli, Manitoba
4/17/94 New York
3/17/95 Melbourne
6/20/95 Red Rocks
9/29/96 New York
9/11/98 New York
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by Kevin Davis »

The Vic is an okay show -- it's fun, the band is generally pretty on, the setlist is certainly great, but even it is sloppy in places. For my tastes it's about as loose as a show can get while still being worthy of consideration for this kind of release.

Soldier Field and the two '98 shows are strong releases. I remember liking Vegas '93 back when it was released as mp3, but I never bought the Vault version. The '91-'93-era shows are kind of one-and-done listens for me, I don't really find myself compelled to revisit them like some later shows.
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

Kevin Davis wrote:The Vic is an okay show -- it's fun, the band is generally pretty on, the setlist is certainly great, but even it is sloppy in places. For my tastes it's about as loose as a show can get while still being worthy of consideration for this kind of release.

Soldier Field and the two '98 shows are strong releases. I remember liking Vegas '93 back when it was released as mp3, but I never bought the Vault version. The '91-'93-era shows are kind of one-and-done listens for me, I don't really find myself compelled to revisit them like some later shows.
This new one is easily my least favorite of all the vault shows, and we waited so fucking long for it. These guys really know how to deliver. :finger:
User avatar
dprival78
Future Drummer
Posts: 2145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:13 pm
Location: CT

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by dprival78 »

Strat wrote:I thought he was just booze and pills.
Image and powders
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40175
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by wease »

joostone wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:
Strat wrote:They are all a mess for this show but especially McCready. His lead lines are very off the mark and often not even hitting in time.

His rig also sounds awful like he maybe forgot some pedals.
He was also probably really leaning into the H around this time
I didn't think McCready was ever actually into heroin.

I thought it was rampant alcoholism and cocaine.
Could be, I always assumed it was heroin due to his friendship with Layne
never heard or read about Mike doing H.
he never did. It was alcohol and cocaine. And in 2000 it was pills.
And shitting
dad
Posting (live)
Posts: 19163
Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by dad »

Severely lacking a No Code show. Those bastards could at least give us an incomplete one.
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil

now when i regular i can promote regularity
User avatar
lowlight79
Future Drummer
Posts: 2080
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:04 pm
Location: Heathrow, FL

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by lowlight79 »

Kevin Davis wrote:
liebzz wrote:A fan voted vault release with a number of choices based on what they have that they can master sounds like a great idea.
I would support this idea, but if only if the fans were Spenno, Wendy Carlos's Twin, ridleybradout, and lowlight.

Or me, as this would be the quickest way to expedite the comprehensive box set of Jack Irons-era material I've been dreaming of since the early 2000's.
I don't know, the band and I seem to be at odds on what there best material is. I go for many different things. The band seems to throw out how they played or sounded out the window and go with emotion, Intensity and the importance of the show. Even the live Vitalogy 25th anniversary playback on PJ radio left me scratching my head.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993

Post by B »

Got the CD today.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
Post Reply