he was certainly leaningtragabigzanda wrote:He was also probably really leaning into the H around this timeStrat wrote:They are all a mess for this show but especially McCready. His lead lines are very off the mark and often not even hitting in time.
His rig also sounds awful like he maybe forgot some pedals.
Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 3:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22220
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
I didn't think McCready was ever actually into heroin.tragabigzanda wrote:He was also probably really leaning into the H around this timeStrat wrote:They are all a mess for this show but especially McCready. His lead lines are very off the mark and often not even hitting in time.
His rig also sounds awful like he maybe forgot some pedals.
I thought it was rampant alcoholism and cocaine.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51634
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Fri January 02, 2026 3:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42771
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
never heard or read about Mike doing H.tragabigzanda wrote:Could be, I always assumed it was heroin due to his friendship with LayneBirds in Hell wrote:I didn't think McCready was ever actually into heroin.tragabigzanda wrote:He was also probably really leaning into the H around this timeStrat wrote:They are all a mess for this show but especially McCready. His lead lines are very off the mark and often not even hitting in time.
His rig also sounds awful like he maybe forgot some pedals.
I thought it was rampant alcoholism and cocaine.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 51787
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Didn't Mike say in the book or in the movie he did heroin?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
-
dad
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 19163
- Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
I think he said he felt like the heroine of the band.
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil
now when i regular i can promote regularity
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
I thought he was just booze and pills.
- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22220
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Who cares, Mike sucks, Jeff rules
- joostone
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1779
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 9:02 am
- Location: Netherlands
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
he never did. It was alcohol and cocaine. And in 2000 it was pills.VinylGuy wrote:never heard or read about Mike doing H.tragabigzanda wrote:Could be, I always assumed it was heroin due to his friendship with LayneBirds in Hell wrote:I didn't think McCready was ever actually into heroin.tragabigzanda wrote:He was also probably really leaning into the H around this timeStrat wrote:They are all a mess for this show but especially McCready. His lead lines are very off the mark and often not even hitting in time.
His rig also sounds awful like he maybe forgot some pedals.
I thought it was rampant alcoholism and cocaine.
- Wendy Carlos's Twin
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2809
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Yeah, it's that spitty-farty sound like when the batteries die in your guitar pedal. And it appears intermittently throughout the show too. Horrible.Strat wrote:They are all a mess for this show but especially McCready. His lead lines are very off the mark and often not even hitting in time.
His rig also sounds awful like he maybe forgot some pedals.
The poor quality of the "new" songs and the general sloppiness reminds one of a more recent show than something from the Dave A era. Maybe that's why they chose it? LOL
- Kevin Davis
- tl;dr
- Posts: 9312
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
I would support this idea, but if only if the fans were Spenno, Wendy Carlos's Twin, ridleybradout, and lowlight.liebzz wrote:A fan voted vault release with a number of choices based on what they have that they can master sounds like a great idea.
Or me, as this would be the quickest way to expedite the comprehensive box set of Jack Irons-era material I've been dreaming of since the early 2000's.
-
liebzz
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10372
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
I mean I could get together a pretty strong list of 9 potential vault shows. I am sure there would be plenty of argument all around. I do agree with Pearl Jam’s selection of the ‘07 vault release from the Vic. That was a great choice. And working this list specifically from what has not been released yet in any form (so excluding the 92 NYE show, the Atlanta 94 show, etc)...
3/6/92 Rotterdam
6/18/92 Zurich
5/13/93 San Francisco
8/14/93 Gimli, Manitoba
4/17/94 New York
3/17/95 Melbourne
6/20/95 Red Rocks
9/29/96 New York
9/11/98 New York
3/6/92 Rotterdam
6/18/92 Zurich
5/13/93 San Francisco
8/14/93 Gimli, Manitoba
4/17/94 New York
3/17/95 Melbourne
6/20/95 Red Rocks
9/29/96 New York
9/11/98 New York
- Kevin Davis
- tl;dr
- Posts: 9312
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
The Vic is an okay show -- it's fun, the band is generally pretty on, the setlist is certainly great, but even it is sloppy in places. For my tastes it's about as loose as a show can get while still being worthy of consideration for this kind of release.
Soldier Field and the two '98 shows are strong releases. I remember liking Vegas '93 back when it was released as mp3, but I never bought the Vault version. The '91-'93-era shows are kind of one-and-done listens for me, I don't really find myself compelled to revisit them like some later shows.
Soldier Field and the two '98 shows are strong releases. I remember liking Vegas '93 back when it was released as mp3, but I never bought the Vault version. The '91-'93-era shows are kind of one-and-done listens for me, I don't really find myself compelled to revisit them like some later shows.
- Wendy Carlos's Twin
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2809
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
This new one is easily my least favorite of all the vault shows, and we waited so fucking long for it. These guys really know how to deliver.Kevin Davis wrote:The Vic is an okay show -- it's fun, the band is generally pretty on, the setlist is certainly great, but even it is sloppy in places. For my tastes it's about as loose as a show can get while still being worthy of consideration for this kind of release.
Soldier Field and the two '98 shows are strong releases. I remember liking Vegas '93 back when it was released as mp3, but I never bought the Vault version. The '91-'93-era shows are kind of one-and-done listens for me, I don't really find myself compelled to revisit them like some later shows.
- dprival78
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2145
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:13 pm
- Location: CT
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Strat wrote:I thought he was just booze and pills.
and powders- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40175
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
And shittingjoostone wrote:he never did. It was alcohol and cocaine. And in 2000 it was pills.VinylGuy wrote:never heard or read about Mike doing H.tragabigzanda wrote:Could be, I always assumed it was heroin due to his friendship with LayneBirds in Hell wrote:I didn't think McCready was ever actually into heroin.tragabigzanda wrote:He was also probably really leaning into the H around this timeStrat wrote:They are all a mess for this show but especially McCready. His lead lines are very off the mark and often not even hitting in time.
His rig also sounds awful like he maybe forgot some pedals.
I thought it was rampant alcoholism and cocaine.
-
dad
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 19163
- Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Severely lacking a No Code show. Those bastards could at least give us an incomplete one.
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil
now when i regular i can promote regularity
- lowlight79
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:04 pm
- Location: Heathrow, FL
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
I don't know, the band and I seem to be at odds on what there best material is. I go for many different things. The band seems to throw out how they played or sounded out the window and go with emotion, Intensity and the importance of the show. Even the live Vitalogy 25th anniversary playback on PJ radio left me scratching my head.Kevin Davis wrote:I would support this idea, but if only if the fans were Spenno, Wendy Carlos's Twin, ridleybradout, and lowlight.liebzz wrote:A fan voted vault release with a number of choices based on what they have that they can master sounds like a great idea.
Or me, as this would be the quickest way to expedite the comprehensive box set of Jack Irons-era material I've been dreaming of since the early 2000's.
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 24953
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Got the CD today.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?