Not worthy of a thread News
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 12:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Bi_3
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16452
- Joined: Wed April 20, 2016 7:11 pm
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
Buy kosher, you'll be fine.
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22817
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
*fentanylWendy Carlos's Twin wrote:The point is that these horror cases you are using as irrefutable evidence of pot's hidden evils are examples of people buying illegal, homemade-manufactured and laced vaping juice on the street, which will fuck you up bad and make you completely stupid. No different from buying illicit pills and finding out too late that they are laced with fetanol.Bi_3 wrote: Not all pot is equal and that’s the point.
If it was legal to purchase recreationally under controlled conditions, it wouldn't be a problem. It's not rocket science.
(she/him/theirs)
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22817
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
Mrs. Bam has refused to eat pork products most of her life. I suppose I can join her now.tragabigzanda wrote:Yeah I’m out. I’ll only eat primo whole cuts from here on out.
(she/him/theirs)
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
Yeah pretty much.bune wrote:
Saving this for five years from now when we’re back to debating the necessity of government-mandated oversight
(patriotic choking noises)
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 12:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29891
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
so what is the difference between “unwanted” hair and “wanted” hairMcParadigm wrote:
also: all these things are organic so will this impact that moniker?
i need to know more to have a better idea what to fear / hate
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29891
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
finally those stone tablets coming in handy for somethingBi_3 wrote:Buy kosher, you'll be fine.
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- bune
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9359
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
- Location: Washington State
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
uh, well, there's a percentage of hair that the standards are ok with and as long as it's less than that it's quote/unquote wanted. past that is unwanted.96583UP wrote:so what is the difference between “unwanted” hair and “wanted” hairMcParadigm wrote:
also: all these things are organic so will this impact that moniker?
i need to know more to have a better idea what to fear / hate
organic as a brand is pretty stupid but I think you already know that.
nothing but fear itself.
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29891
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
hmmm so we already get hair in the pork and organic is a farce and probably contains poop already because hippies love it conceptuallybune wrote:uh, well, there's a percentage of hair that the standards are ok with and as long as it's less than that it's quote/unquote wanted. past that is unwanted.96583UP wrote:so what is the difference between “unwanted” hair and “wanted” hairMcParadigm wrote:
also: all these things are organic so will this impact that moniker?
i need to know more to have a better idea what to fear / hate
organic as a brand is pretty stupid but I think you already know that.
nothing but fear itself.
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29891
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
the sex organs might contain useful vitamins
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29891
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
bladders dont scare me
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29891
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
and i already eat toenails, so
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29891
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
i think all-in i am fine with this
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
-
doug rr
- The Master
- Posts: 27424
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
- Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
96583UP wrote:i think all-in i am swine with this
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29891
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
the pork is to mouth what the clock is to time
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- LetMeSleep
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 18005
- Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/
- Location: Scooby Doo
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
https://www.theguardian.com/money/2019/ ... oductivityBREAKING NEWS: Say goodbye to comfort breaks! New downward-tilting toilets are designed to become unbearable to sit on after five minutes. They say the main benefit is to employees in improved employee productivity.
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51692
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 12:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
- bune
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9359
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:03 pm
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/bune_yurievich
- Location: Washington State
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
This is the first time I've been glad the building I work in has public bathrooms and they can't install these.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Not worthy of a thread News
The triumph of the rich, which is one of the defining stories of our time, is generally described as largely the reflection of two factors. The first, of course, is the explosion of income among top earners, in which a tiny minority has vacuumed up a ballooning share of the gains from the past few decades of economic growth.
The second factor — which will be key to the 2020 presidential race — has been the hidden decline in the progressivity of the tax code at the top, in which the wealthiest earners have over those same decades seen their effective tax rates steadily fall.
Put those two factors together, and they tell a story about soaring U.S. inequality that is in some ways even more dramatic than each is on its own.
![]()
(patriotic choking noises)
