Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

May the force be with you
Post Reply

Well?

Loved it - among the best Star Wars Movies
5
8%
Really liked it, but not one of the best
11
18%
Liked it - it's Star Wars
17
27%
Ehhh
21
34%
I miss the prequels
8
13%
 
Total votes: 62

User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43430
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by VinylGuy »

I loved the first JJ Star Trek movie, but the second was just...a reboot of Wrath. It was as flawed as TFA but without the charm of this one.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23547
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by Anders »

I liked the first one, but thought it was partly ruined by the bad time travel story. The second is among my top 100 movies of the decade.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43430
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by VinylGuy »

I actually liked that idea of a different timeline. It was very smart to have that and still have the old movies.

100 movies of the decade? wow you are a fan.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23547
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by Anders »

Time travel stories are one of the things I very seldom like. Although it’s different for Dr. Who where it’s the whole concept.

A reboot I have no problem with.
User avatar
lowlight79
Future Drummer
Posts: 2083
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:04 pm
Location: Heathrow, FL

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by lowlight79 »

Can we all agree that Kathleen Kennedy should be shot out of a fucking cannon on January 1st 2020 for all Star Wars fans to see?
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4143
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by blueviper »

lowlight79 wrote:Can we all agree that Kathleen Kennedy should be shot out of a fucking cannon on January 1st 2020 for all Star Wars fans to see?
That seems a bit hyperbolic.


This, and the outrage against Kathleen Kennedy seems a bit unwarranted. Everyone knows my displeasure with the ST but I can't place the blame on Kennedy. Check out her CV on wikipedia. She's more than earned her position at Lucasfilm. Now, people pissed about TLJ and TROS want to burn her at the stake.

Weird.
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4143
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by blueviper »

and I don't think there are really any jabs taken in TROS against TLJ.

Luke catching the saber? At the end of TLJ he's already decided that he was probably wrong about everything beforehand and does come back to help out. It's like he realized his mistake. The saber catch just solidifies it.

Rose not being used? Maybe, but there are so many speaking roles created in the past few films that they all can't get equal screen time.


Am I, in a round about way, defending TLJ? Dear lord...
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36767
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by Jorge »

blueviper wrote:and I don't think there are really any jabs taken in TROS against TLJ.

Luke catching the saber? At the end of TLJ he's already decided that he was probably wrong about everything beforehand and does come back to help out. It's like he realized his mistake. The saber catch just solidifies it.

Rose not being used? Maybe, but there are so many speaking roles created in the past few films that they all can't get equal screen time.


Am I, in a round about way, defending TLJ? Dear lord...
The more I think about it, the more it comes down to this: The end of The Last Jedi set up a movie that had to figure out creative and interesting ways to deal with the dangling plot threads. Kylo Ren is beyond redemption; he is not Anakin Skywalker, he is now effectively the Big Bad, he has smashed his helmet after realizing that he only wears it to emulate Darth Vader, and he is not Darth Vader. The Force is a thing that you don't need to have "special blood" to tap into; it's this universal life force that anyone can access, and Rey is just a regular person who is sensitive to it. The war is more than just evil space wizards versus good space wizards; it is a consequence of avarice and greed of the ruling class, and the folk legend of the Jedi and the resistance will encourage the oppressed to rise above their station and fight.

In TROS: No, actually, Kylo Ren is the redeemable Darth Vader facsimile, he has superglued his mask back together, and also he isn't the Big Bad anymore because we are bringing the old Big Bad back, and also Rey isn't a nobody, she also has special blood! Which you need to be super powerful in the force. And we are going to again focus on evil space wizards versus good space wizards, and did we mention the Emperor is back?! That's cool, right?

TLJ feels like an infinitely more interesting, personal story in light of TROS's fanboy pandering
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
lowlight79
Future Drummer
Posts: 2083
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:04 pm
Location: Heathrow, FL

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by lowlight79 »

blueviper wrote:and I don't think there are really any jabs taken in TROS against TLJ.

Luke catching the saber? At the end of TLJ he's already decided that he was probably wrong about everything beforehand and does come back to help out. It's like he realized his mistake. The saber catch just solidifies it.

Rose not being used? Maybe, but there are so many speaking roles created in the past few films that they all can't get equal screen time.


Am I, in a round about way, defending TLJ? Dear lord...
I'm not saying it's an easy job at LF, but she got a pass with the first film being basically ANH remake. I enjoyed TLJ alot, my only issue is maybe there needed to be some stuff cut, I believe putting Luke in the first film would of maybe eased, but not help the reaction to Luke in TLJ, but people either liked it or hated it. TROS while in my previous post I stated had some amazing moments, I did like the film, but the entire film feels rushed; and the fact they just put story aside for the sake of making a fun film wasn't the way I wanted to see it end. They should of never stuck to putting that movie out in 2019. They needed more time, but Disney is a machine, scheduling movies out 3 or 4 years now. Don't get me wrong, Disney has done some amazing stuff, but they are monopolizing the film industry.
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4143
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by blueviper »

lowlight79 wrote:
blueviper wrote:and I don't think there are really any jabs taken in TROS against TLJ.

Luke catching the saber? At the end of TLJ he's already decided that he was probably wrong about everything beforehand and does come back to help out. It's like he realized his mistake. The saber catch just solidifies it.

Rose not being used? Maybe, but there are so many speaking roles created in the past few films that they all can't get equal screen time.


Am I, in a round about way, defending TLJ? Dear lord...
I'm not saying it's an easy job at LF, but she got a pass with the first film being basically ANH remake. I enjoyed TLJ alot, my only issue is maybe there needed to be some stuff cut, I believe putting Luke in the first film would of maybe eased, but not help the reaction to Luke in TLJ, but people either liked it or hated it. TROS while in my previous post I stated had some amazing moments, I did like the film, but the entire film feels rushed; and the fact they just put story aside for the sake of making a fun film wasn't the way I wanted to see it end. They should of never stuck to putting that movie out in 2019. They needed more time, but Disney is a machine, scheduling movies out 3 or 4 years now. Don't get me wrong, Disney has done some amazing stuff, but they are monopolizing the film industry.
True. Just look at the release schedule. 2 years between movies instead of the 3 years that the OT and PT had.

When you have a 3rd death star (in TFA) and then death star star destroyers (in TROS), then something is really wrong with your story idea meetings at LFL.
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
User avatar
lowlight79
Future Drummer
Posts: 2083
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:04 pm
Location: Heathrow, FL

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by lowlight79 »

blueviper wrote:
lowlight79 wrote:
blueviper wrote:and I don't think there are really any jabs taken in TROS against TLJ.

Luke catching the saber? At the end of TLJ he's already decided that he was probably wrong about everything beforehand and does come back to help out. It's like he realized his mistake. The saber catch just solidifies it.

Rose not being used? Maybe, but there are so many speaking roles created in the past few films that they all can't get equal screen time.


Am I, in a round about way, defending TLJ? Dear lord...
I'm not saying it's an easy job at LF, but she got a pass with the first film being basically ANH remake. I enjoyed TLJ alot, my only issue is maybe there needed to be some stuff cut, I believe putting Luke in the first film would of maybe eased, but not help the reaction to Luke in TLJ, but people either liked it or hated it. TROS while in my previous post I stated had some amazing moments, I did like the film, but the entire film feels rushed; and the fact they just put story aside for the sake of making a fun film wasn't the way I wanted to see it end. They should of never stuck to putting that movie out in 2019. They needed more time, but Disney is a machine, scheduling movies out 3 or 4 years now. Don't get me wrong, Disney has done some amazing stuff, but they are monopolizing the film industry.
True. Just look at the release schedule. 2 years between movies instead of the 3 years that the OT and PT had.

When you have a 3rd death star (in TFA) and then death star star destroyers (in TROS), then something is really wrong with your story idea meetings at LFL.
Lucas: Were gonna make him a kid.

JJ: We need more Death Star like things!
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43430
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by VinylGuy »

Well, im not sure its Kennedy´s fault but they had their issues for sure. They fired directors, tossed out scripts, reshooted movies.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by dimejinky99 »

Did you all miss Finn being force sensitive in this? You seem to have.

It didn’t just awaken in him it awakened in Jannah and her squad when they wouldn’t carry out the killing.

That’s the carry through from tlj of the force being in all of us to varying degrees of capability.

Weird people seem to have missed that
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8621
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by Mecca »

dimejinky99 wrote:Did you all miss Finn being force sensitive in this? You seem to have.

It didn’t just awaken in him it awakened in Jannah and her squad when they wouldn’t carry out the killing.

That’s the carry through from tlj of the force being in all of us to varying degrees of capability.

Weird people seem to have missed that
That’s not how the force works
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43430
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by VinylGuy »

dimejinky99 wrote:Did you all miss Finn being force sensitive in this? You seem to have.

It didn’t just awaken in him it awakened in Jannah and her squad when they wouldn’t carry out the killing.

That’s the carry through from tlj of the force being in all of us to varying degrees of capability.

Weird people seem to have missed that
I didnt miss it. Finn being force sensitive is something JJ also hinted in TFA. But its just a hint, here its a little more explicit but not talked about.
Im ok with how its handled here.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40690
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by wease »

dimejinky99 wrote:Did you all miss Finn being force sensitive in this? You seem to have.
Nope. Didn’t miss it.
dimejinky99 wrote: It didn’t just awaken in him it awakened in Jannah and her squad when they wouldn’t carry out the killing.
Nope. That did not happen.
dimejinky99 wrote: That’s the carry through from tlj of the force being in all of us to varying degrees of capability.
Sure. Especially if you’re a Palpatine.
dimejinky99 wrote: Weird people seem to have missed that
Nope
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36767
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by Jorge »

dimejinky99 wrote:Did you all miss Finn being force sensitive in this? You seem to have.

It didn’t just awaken in him it awakened in Jannah and her squad when they wouldn’t carry out the killing.

That’s the carry through from tlj of the force being in all of us to varying degrees of capability.

Weird people seem to have missed that
I did kind of miss it, and I only really realized that the secret he was supposed to tell Rey was that he was force-sensitive until after reading post-release interviews, and it seems like that's the case for most people, and I think that indicates that it was not conveyed very effectively.

It also means that as an idea it went from a major thematic element to a barely-there, easily-missable thing
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Kaius
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 11136
Joined: Fri November 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by Kaius »

theplatypus wrote:
blueviper wrote:and I don't think there are really any jabs taken in TROS against TLJ.

Luke catching the saber? At the end of TLJ he's already decided that he was probably wrong about everything beforehand and does come back to help out. It's like he realized his mistake. The saber catch just solidifies it.

Rose not being used? Maybe, but there are so many speaking roles created in the past few films that they all can't get equal screen time.


Am I, in a round about way, defending TLJ? Dear lord...
The more I think about it, the more it comes down to this: The end of The Last Jedi set up a movie that had to figure out creative and interesting ways to deal with the dangling plot threads. Kylo Ren is beyond redemption; he is not Anakin Skywalker, he is now effectively the Big Bad, he has smashed his helmet after realizing that he only wears it to emulate Darth Vader, and he is not Darth Vader. The Force is a thing that you don't need to have "special blood" to tap into; it's this universal life force that anyone can access, and Rey is just a regular person who is sensitive to it. The war is more than just evil space wizards versus good space wizards; it is a consequence of avarice and greed of the ruling class, and the folk legend of the Jedi and the resistance will encourage the oppressed to rise above their station and fight.

In TROS: No, actually, Kylo Ren is the redeemable Darth Vader facsimile, he has superglued his mask back together, and also he isn't the Big Bad anymore because we are bringing the old Big Bad back, and also Rey isn't a nobody, she also has special blood! Which you need to be super powerful in the force. And we are going to again focus on evil space wizards versus good space wizards, and did we mention the Emperor is back?! That's cool, right?

TLJ feels like an infinitely more interesting, personal story in light of TROS's fanboy pandering
:thumbsup:
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by dimejinky99 »

Wow. He’s not wrong.

‘ “Kylo literally caused the deaths of the entire original Star Wars trilogy trio.”
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: Star Wars: Episode IX: The Rise of Skywalker

Post by Monkey_Driven »

theplatypus wrote:
blueviper wrote:and I don't think there are really any jabs taken in TROS against TLJ.

Luke catching the saber? At the end of TLJ he's already decided that he was probably wrong about everything beforehand and does come back to help out. It's like he realized his mistake. The saber catch just solidifies it.

Rose not being used? Maybe, but there are so many speaking roles created in the past few films that they all can't get equal screen time.


Am I, in a round about way, defending TLJ? Dear lord...
The more I think about it, the more it comes down to this: The end of The Last Jedi set up a movie that had to figure out creative and interesting ways to deal with the dangling plot threads. Kylo Ren is beyond redemption; he is not Anakin Skywalker, he is now effectively the Big Bad, he has smashed his helmet after realizing that he only wears it to emulate Darth Vader, and he is not Darth Vader. The Force is a thing that you don't need to have "special blood" to tap into; it's this universal life force that anyone can access, and Rey is just a regular person who is sensitive to it. The war is more than just evil space wizards versus good space wizards; it is a consequence of avarice and greed of the ruling class, and the folk legend of the Jedi and the resistance will encourage the oppressed to rise above their station and fight.

In TROS: No, actually, Kylo Ren is the redeemable Darth Vader facsimile, he has superglued his mask back together, and also he isn't the Big Bad anymore because we are bringing the old Big Bad back, and also Rey isn't a nobody, she also has special blood! Which you need to be super powerful in the force. And we are going to again focus on evil space wizards versus good space wizards, and did we mention the Emperor is back?! That's cool, right?

TLJ feels like an infinitely more interesting, personal story in light of TROS's fanboy pandering
Nicely put. I completely agree with most of this!
Post Reply