Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42771
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
listening right now...yeah, its a cool one. Its sloppy at times, but its still a cool show.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40175
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Tremor Christ is a clusterfuck.
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42771
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
yeah, it is.wease wrote:Tremor Christ is a clusterfuck.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40175
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Mike's drunken slide in Footsteps is kinda terrible, too.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
It's a pretty "ho hum" show (particularly for the time), the Vegas '93 show Vault release is a much stronger performance.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
I actually like it, messy as it is. It's more like a Time Fades Away-style sloppiness than it is the post-2000 "lol who even cares how to play this song anymore"wease wrote:Mike's drunken slide in Footsteps is kinda terrible, too.
(patriotic choking noises)
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Oh cmon mcp. You’re not one to wear rose colored glasses. Drop the gimmick. It’s an awful performance and you know it.McParadigm wrote:I actually like it, messy as it is. It's more like a Time Fades Away-style sloppiness than it is the post-2000 "lol who even cares how to play this song anymore"wease wrote:Mike's drunken slide in Footsteps is kinda terrible, too.
-
jgardz
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Mon July 22, 2013 6:13 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
I like the sound quality/mix and the fact that the entire show is here...that said, it’s certainly not their finest show from that era. These vault releases always get me excited and then they are so often lacking...either missing songs, or are just lacklustre performances.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40175
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
No, it’s a “I’m shit faced drunk and don’t know what the fuck I’m doing”-style sloppiness.McParadigm wrote:I actually like it, messy as it is. It's more like a Time Fades Away-style sloppiness than it is the post-2000 "lol who even cares how to play this song anymore"wease wrote:Mike's drunken slide in Footsteps is kinda terrible, too.
-
TouringReg
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Fri March 22, 2013 2:04 am
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Ignoring whether or not this is an average or bad performance, my biggest complaint about this is we already have a show from one month before on the same tour. Seems super redundant/lazy to cover this leg of the Vs tour again. Even something from spring 94 would have been preferred.Birds in Hell wrote:It's a pretty "ho hum" show (particularly for the time), the Vegas '93 show Vault release is a much stronger performance.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Agreed.TouringReg wrote:Ignoring whether or not this is an average or bad performance, my biggest complaint about this is we already have a show from one month before on the same tour. Seems super redundant/lazy to cover this leg of the Vs tour again. Even something from spring 94 would have been preferred.Birds in Hell wrote:It's a pretty "ho hum" show (particularly for the time), the Vegas '93 show Vault release is a much stronger performance.
Nine Vault releases to date (and two more if you want to bundle in the shows from the Ten and Vs reissues) and yet still nothing from the No Code tour and only one show with Jack on drums (Solder Field '95).
- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22220
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
They view their career exactly how the average fairweather fan does
-
liebzz
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10372
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Finally listened to this straight through. I think that while it is sloppy in points that it’s an overall above average show from that time period. The question I think they need to ask themselves in these vault releases is whether they want to focus on quality shows or shows where they did something cool. This fall in the latter category with the Mamasan trilogy played, the nicely extended I’ve Got a Feeling, what seemed like a really good Rockin’ in the Free World, and the debuts(?) of the Vitalogy songs that both sound like sketches of songs rather than early complete versions. That stuff is cool, and the show on the whole is energetic and Eddie sounds really good throughout, but you can definitely hear the band a bit out of whack in parts, particularly at the beginning of SOLAT and Daughter. Do I think there are better shows for the vault releases? Yes. Is this something that is bad? Not at all.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40175
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Who's singing the first part of the third verse on RITFW? It sure ain't Ed.
- DissidentRival4
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Wed March 02, 2016 3:34 am
- Location: The 615
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
I just listened to this whole show for the first time today at work. I enjoyed it, but I don't have the extensive library most do. Made me really miss 90's Pearl Jam.wease wrote:Who's singing the first part of the third verse on RITFW? It sure ain't Ed.
But in response to your question, I thought/assumed it was Mark Arm, but I have no idea. I just assumed being a Seattle show, and the scream he gives during his part, just reminded me a lot of him during Sonic Reducer at the Orpheum 94 show...
"Your world is ending soon. Mine's a little better cuz I never watch the news..."
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 42771
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
i tought it was doug pinnickwease wrote:Who's singing the first part of the third verse on RITFW? It sure ain't Ed.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40175
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Did they open on that leg of the tour?VinylGuy wrote:i tought it was doug pinnickwease wrote:Who's singing the first part of the third verse on RITFW? It sure ain't Ed.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16263
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
No.wease wrote:Did they open on that leg of the tour?VinylGuy wrote:i tought it was doug pinnickwease wrote:Who's singing the first part of the third verse on RITFW? It sure ain't Ed.
Urge Overkill were the main support through that period of the tour (per Five Horizons) - it's possibly UO's singer Ed Roeser.
It's definitely not Mark Arm.
- bodysnatcher
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22220
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
- Location: the bathroom
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
My shipping status has said “label not yet created” for 3 weeks now. Same for others?
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21560
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: Vault #9: Seattle 12-8-1993
Mine is out for delivery today; I had initially received the gotten the shipping email on 12/18. Good luck.
McParadigm wrote:lol