Buby wrote:This bitch leaked
Knock it off
Buby wrote:This bitch leaked
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
Remove that piano, and the front half loses a lot of its feeling of forward motion. "So, uh...you're still playing that riff, huh? Cool..."harmless wrote:1) Too much production polishdimejinky99 wrote:Cleverman wrote:This is probably for another thread, but I'm of the opinion UK would be more liked if it had been on a better album...say Yield or something. Does that make sense?harmless wrote:I was only worried about that one review implying that Lightning Bolt itself sounded more like Unthought Known than it had already, played live, and also that half of the songs were entertaining but less challenging rock songs a la Backspacer. Having said that though, there are also less challenging rock songs on Riot Act and Binaural ('Get Right is a cool but uncomplicated song, so is Green Disease), so are we getting anything wildly different than normal? Possibly not.dimejinky99 wrote:harmless wrote:The whole thing about Stone saying "It's going to alienate people, like No Code did" in the first session, and then saying "It sounds like Pearl Jam" in the second, doesn't have to be explained by a move from freaky awesomeness to Backspacer 2, by the way. It could just be that he was told to reign it in, don't say our new album will alienate, you'll put everyone off, etc. It doesn't necessarily indicate what kind of music he was referring to, just that the later quote was less revealing in its info. If anything, if this album is any move away from Backspacer at all, he may have felt the need to warn the pop fans about it. You know, all those people who have got on board since Backspacer...
In fairness a severe left turn artistically was predicted and expected after the last one.
I'm not buying the logical extension argument at all apart from that one song being a left over.
Sometimes songs don't find their place til later. Pj have demonstrated this often in the past.
I've often felt that about UK too. It's pretty much got that classic PJ stamp all over it.
Never understood why it didn't get more love here.
2) Not good structurally; the last third goes nowhere
3) Brendan's piano ruins it
It's OK by me. And it's a good career move, to gradually move back so as to introduce your new fans (those elusive new fans) to your wilder stuff.bluestate wrote:Yea, and what I keep thinking is that if this new album went all the way in a whole new direction then that would leave Backspacer just standing there by itself the one oddball in the PJ catalog. However, if LB really works at mixing a bit of Backspacer with something new and exciting, that might provide a better context for Backspacer and, in the long run, may allow it to hold its proper place in the PJ catalog. Perhaps that's just way too much positive thinking for RM. Sorry.harmless wrote:Absolutely yes, and I'm still happy. To me it's crazy, if the band are even slowly moving back to that more serious, experimental place, to still complain about it not being enough.NothingBetterMan wrote:Ding Ding Ding!bluestate wrote:I'm not saying the reviews so far suggest this but... If someone told us at the outset that Lightning Bolt was going to sound like equal parts "a logical extension of Backspacer" and equal parts "something new and different, dark and moody, experimental, strange"... I'm pretty sure most of you would have been pleased with that, right?
(I could have simply said "yes," but my brain literally did that when I read your question. So here we are.)
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
It is pretty classic PJ, if you're willing to acknowledge there are a few different strains of "classic PJ." It's not as good as it seemed upon first hearing it, but it's good.dimejinky99 wrote:I've often felt that about UK too. It's pretty much got that classic PJ stamp all over it. Never understood why it didn't get more love here.
Jaeti wrote:It is pretty classic PJ, if you're willing to acknowledge there are a few different strains of "classic PJ." It's not as good as it seemed upon first hearing it, but it's good.dimejinky99 wrote:I've often felt that about UK too. It's pretty much got that classic PJ stamp all over it. Never understood why it didn't get more love here.
Yeah, you're right... there would still need to be something in place of the piano for that section to work. I just hate the piano. I hate what's played, I hate the way it's played. The fact that it wouldn't have survived with guitars alone is probably a knock on the song more than the piano itself. I guess Mike could've done something in place of the piano, that's what usually happens, but the fact is, through their career PJ have hardly ever decided any of their musical interludes needs a piano.McParadigm wrote:Remove that piano, and the front half loses a lot of its feeling of forward motion. "So, uh...you're still playing that riff, huh? Cool..."harmless wrote:1) Too much production polishdimejinky99 wrote:Cleverman wrote:This is probably for another thread, but I'm of the opinion UK would be more liked if it had been on a better album...say Yield or something. Does that make sense?harmless wrote:I was only worried about that one review implying that Lightning Bolt itself sounded more like Unthought Known than it had already, played live, and also that half of the songs were entertaining but less challenging rock songs a la Backspacer. Having said that though, there are also less challenging rock songs on Riot Act and Binaural ('Get Right is a cool but uncomplicated song, so is Green Disease), so are we getting anything wildly different than normal? Possibly not.dimejinky99 wrote:harmless wrote:The whole thing about Stone saying "It's going to alienate people, like No Code did" in the first session, and then saying "It sounds like Pearl Jam" in the second, doesn't have to be explained by a move from freaky awesomeness to Backspacer 2, by the way. It could just be that he was told to reign it in, don't say our new album will alienate, you'll put everyone off, etc. It doesn't necessarily indicate what kind of music he was referring to, just that the later quote was less revealing in its info. If anything, if this album is any move away from Backspacer at all, he may have felt the need to warn the pop fans about it. You know, all those people who have got on board since Backspacer...
In fairness a severe left turn artistically was predicted and expected after the last one.
I'm not buying the logical extension argument at all apart from that one song being a left over.
Sometimes songs don't find their place til later. Pj have demonstrated this often in the past.
I've often felt that about UK too. It's pretty much got that classic PJ stamp all over it.
Never understood why it didn't get more love here.
2) Not good structurally; the last third goes nowhere
3) Brendan's piano ruins it
To me, it was always time to hit the skip button once the "nothing left"s started up.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
I think it has some good lyrics and deserves a better structure underneath them.dimejinky99 wrote:Jaeti wrote:It is pretty classic PJ, if you're willing to acknowledge there are a few different strains of "classic PJ." It's not as good as it seemed upon first hearing it, but it's good.dimejinky99 wrote:I've often felt that about UK too. It's pretty much got that classic PJ stamp all over it. Never understood why it didn't get more love here.
It's one of those songs that just spoke to me, and its much better live than in the record. Which is unusual.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
I also always appreciated that it sprinkled itself high up while Ed was warbling down below, then quit doing it when he shot upward in order to leave all that space for him to fill up. That was a good move...just kind of remind people of all that empty space up there, then the bass kicks in and Ed just owns it (even if it took a lot of echo and studio to make it happen).harmless wrote:Yeah, you're right... there would still need to be something in place of the piano for that section to work. I just hate the piano. I hate what's played, I hate the way it's played. The fact that it wouldn't have survived with guitars alone is probably a knock on the song more than the piano itself. I guess Mike could've done something in place of the piano, that's what usually happens, but the fact is, through their career PJ have hardly ever decided any of their musical interludes needs a piano.
I don't hate UK, but its not one of my favorites from bs just because it has always felt forced, it isn't a song that just naturally became a song that builds during the writing process, it feels like they ( or ed ) went in trying to write a song like that.dimejinky99 wrote:Jaeti wrote:It is pretty classic PJ, if you're willing to acknowledge there are a few different strains of "classic PJ." It's not as good as it seemed upon first hearing it, but it's good.dimejinky99 wrote:I've often felt that about UK too. It's pretty much got that classic PJ stamp all over it. Never understood why it didn't get more love here.
It's one of those songs that just spoke to me, and its much better live than in the record. Which is unusual.
It veers to close to a signature Springsteen song in the middle. Its a little disappointing.harmless wrote:I think it has some good lyrics and deserves a better structure underneath them.dimejinky99 wrote:Jaeti wrote:It is pretty classic PJ, if you're willing to acknowledge there are a few different strains of "classic PJ." It's not as good as it seemed upon first hearing it, but it's good.dimejinky99 wrote:I've often felt that about UK too. It's pretty much got that classic PJ stamp all over it. Never understood why it didn't get more love here.
It's one of those songs that just spoke to me, and its much better live than in the record. Which is unusual.
Actually, I should clarify. I like what the piano does until the instrumental transition into the "Nothing left!" section. It's only a few seconds but it's too much Meatloaf key-bashing for me. But the single-note stuff happening in the intro really does a lot for the song.McParadigm wrote:I also always appreciated that it sprinkled itself high up while Ed was warbling down below, then quit doing it when he shot upward in order to leave all that space for him to fill up. That was a good move...just kind of remind people of all that empty space up there, then the bass kicks in and Ed just owns it (even if it took a lot of echo and studio to make it happen).harmless wrote:Yeah, you're right... there would still need to be something in place of the piano for that section to work. I just hate the piano. I hate what's played, I hate the way it's played. The fact that it wouldn't have survived with guitars alone is probably a knock on the song more than the piano itself. I guess Mike could've done something in place of the piano, that's what usually happens, but the fact is, through their career PJ have hardly ever decided any of their musical interludes needs a piano.
That song was the one thing on that record that I really thought did something interesting...especially the change in the bridge, which reminded me of the transition into the guitar solo in Springsteen's Rising...but it wasn't written out enough to stay interesting long term.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
That's the fastest way to make sureStrat wrote:Knock it offBuby wrote:This bitch leaked
Lightning Bolt, for all its flaws, seems like the finished thing.Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:I don't hate UK, but its not one of my favorites from bs just because it has always felt forced, it isn't a song that just naturally became a song that builds during the writing process, it feels like they ( or ed ) went in trying to write a song like that.dimejinky99 wrote:Jaeti wrote:It is pretty classic PJ, if you're willing to acknowledge there are a few different strains of "classic PJ." It's not as good as it seemed upon first hearing it, but it's good.dimejinky99 wrote:I've often felt that about UK too. It's pretty much got that classic PJ stamp all over it. Never understood why it didn't get more love here.
It's one of those songs that just spoke to me, and its much better live than in the record. Which is unusual.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
I swear to God all this piano you guys notice never makes an impression on me. Certainly not enough to derail anything.harmless wrote:Yeah, you're right... there would still need to be something in place of the piano for that section to work. I just hate the piano. I hate what's played, I hate the way it's played. The fact that it wouldn't have survived with guitars alone is probably a knock on the song more than the piano itself. I guess Mike could've done something in place of the piano, that's what usually happens, but the fact is, through their career PJ have hardly ever decided any of their musical interludes needs a piano.McParadigm wrote:Remove that piano, and the front half loses a lot of its feeling of forward motion. "So, uh...you're still playing that riff, huh? Cool..."harmless wrote:1) Too much production polishdimejinky99 wrote:Cleverman wrote:This is probably for another thread, but I'm of the opinion UK would be more liked if it had been on a better album...say Yield or something. Does that make sense?harmless wrote:I was only worried about that one review implying that Lightning Bolt itself sounded more like Unthought Known than it had already, played live, and also that half of the songs were entertaining but less challenging rock songs a la Backspacer. Having said that though, there are also less challenging rock songs on Riot Act and Binaural ('Get Right is a cool but uncomplicated song, so is Green Disease), so are we getting anything wildly different than normal? Possibly not.dimejinky99 wrote:harmless wrote:The whole thing about Stone saying "It's going to alienate people, like No Code did" in the first session, and then saying "It sounds like Pearl Jam" in the second, doesn't have to be explained by a move from freaky awesomeness to Backspacer 2, by the way. It could just be that he was told to reign it in, don't say our new album will alienate, you'll put everyone off, etc. It doesn't necessarily indicate what kind of music he was referring to, just that the later quote was less revealing in its info. If anything, if this album is any move away from Backspacer at all, he may have felt the need to warn the pop fans about it. You know, all those people who have got on board since Backspacer...
In fairness a severe left turn artistically was predicted and expected after the last one.
I'm not buying the logical extension argument at all apart from that one song being a left over.
Sometimes songs don't find their place til later. Pj have demonstrated this often in the past.
I've often felt that about UK too. It's pretty much got that classic PJ stamp all over it.
Never understood why it didn't get more love here.
2) Not good structurally; the last third goes nowhere
3) Brendan's piano ruins it
To me, it was always time to hit the skip button once the "nothing left"s started up.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
evenslow wrote:I swear to God all this piano you guys notice never makes an impression on me. Certainly not enough to derail anything.harmless wrote:Yeah, you're right... there would still need to be something in place of the piano for that section to work. I just hate the piano. I hate what's played, I hate the way it's played. The fact that it wouldn't have survived with guitars alone is probably a knock on the song more than the piano itself. I guess Mike could've done something in place of the piano, that's what usually happens, but the fact is, through their career PJ have hardly ever decided any of their musical interludes needs a piano.McParadigm wrote:Remove that piano, and the front half loses a lot of its feeling of forward motion. "So, uh...you're still playing that riff, huh? Cool..."harmless wrote:1) Too much production polishdimejinky99 wrote:Cleverman wrote:This is probably for another thread, but I'm of the opinion UK would be more liked if it had been on a better album...say Yield or something. Does that make sense?harmless wrote:I was only worried about that one review implying that Lightning Bolt itself sounded more like Unthought Known than it had already, played live, and also that half of the songs were entertaining but less challenging rock songs a la Backspacer. Having said that though, there are also less challenging rock songs on Riot Act and Binaural ('Get Right is a cool but uncomplicated song, so is Green Disease), so are we getting anything wildly different than normal? Possibly not.dimejinky99 wrote:harmless wrote:The whole thing about Stone saying "It's going to alienate people, like No Code did" in the first session, and then saying "It sounds like Pearl Jam" in the second, doesn't have to be explained by a move from freaky awesomeness to Backspacer 2, by the way. It could just be that he was told to reign it in, don't say our new album will alienate, you'll put everyone off, etc. It doesn't necessarily indicate what kind of music he was referring to, just that the later quote was less revealing in its info. If anything, if this album is any move away from Backspacer at all, he may have felt the need to warn the pop fans about it. You know, all those people who have got on board since Backspacer...
In fairness a severe left turn artistically was predicted and expected after the last one.
I'm not buying the logical extension argument at all apart from that one song being a left over.
Sometimes songs don't find their place til later. Pj have demonstrated this often in the past.
I've often felt that about UK too. It's pretty much got that classic PJ stamp all over it.
Never understood why it didn't get more love here.
2) Not good structurally; the last third goes nowhere
3) Brendan's piano ruins it
To me, it was always time to hit the skip button once the "nothing left"s started up.
I will remember that when you try to tell me the studio version of Lightning Bolt isn't terrible!evenslow wrote:I swear to God all this piano you guys notice never makes an impression on me. Certainly not enough to derail anything.harmless wrote:Yeah, you're right... there would still need to be something in place of the piano for that section to work. I just hate the piano. I hate what's played, I hate the way it's played. The fact that it wouldn't have survived with guitars alone is probably a knock on the song more than the piano itself. I guess Mike could've done something in place of the piano, that's what usually happens, but the fact is, through their career PJ have hardly ever decided any of their musical interludes needs a piano.McParadigm wrote:Remove that piano, and the front half loses a lot of its feeling of forward motion. "So, uh...you're still playing that riff, huh? Cool..."harmless wrote:1) Too much production polishdimejinky99 wrote:Cleverman wrote:This is probably for another thread, but I'm of the opinion UK would be more liked if it had been on a better album...say Yield or something. Does that make sense?harmless wrote:I was only worried about that one review implying that Lightning Bolt itself sounded more like Unthought Known than it had already, played live, and also that half of the songs were entertaining but less challenging rock songs a la Backspacer. Having said that though, there are also less challenging rock songs on Riot Act and Binaural ('Get Right is a cool but uncomplicated song, so is Green Disease), so are we getting anything wildly different than normal? Possibly not.dimejinky99 wrote:harmless wrote:The whole thing about Stone saying "It's going to alienate people, like No Code did" in the first session, and then saying "It sounds like Pearl Jam" in the second, doesn't have to be explained by a move from freaky awesomeness to Backspacer 2, by the way. It could just be that he was told to reign it in, don't say our new album will alienate, you'll put everyone off, etc. It doesn't necessarily indicate what kind of music he was referring to, just that the later quote was less revealing in its info. If anything, if this album is any move away from Backspacer at all, he may have felt the need to warn the pop fans about it. You know, all those people who have got on board since Backspacer...
In fairness a severe left turn artistically was predicted and expected after the last one.
I'm not buying the logical extension argument at all apart from that one song being a left over.
Sometimes songs don't find their place til later. Pj have demonstrated this often in the past.
I've often felt that about UK too. It's pretty much got that classic PJ stamp all over it.
Never understood why it didn't get more love here.
2) Not good structurally; the last third goes nowhere
3) Brendan's piano ruins it
To me, it was always time to hit the skip button once the "nothing left"s started up.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
I always heard Billy Joel in that playingharmless wrote:Actually, I should clarify. I like what the piano does until the instrumental transition into the "Nothing left!" section. It's only a few seconds but it's too much Meatloaf key-bashing for me.
I may not tell you that. I was not moved by the song at all when I heard it live. For that particular track, I'm just hoping for good enough.harmless wrote:I will remember that when you try to tell me the studio version of Lightning Bolt isn't terrible!evenslow wrote:I swear to God all this piano you guys notice never makes an impression on me. Certainly not enough to derail anything.harmless wrote:Yeah, you're right... there would still need to be something in place of the piano for that section to work. I just hate the piano. I hate what's played, I hate the way it's played. The fact that it wouldn't have survived with guitars alone is probably a knock on the song more than the piano itself. I guess Mike could've done something in place of the piano, that's what usually happens, but the fact is, through their career PJ have hardly ever decided any of their musical interludes needs a piano.McParadigm wrote:Remove that piano, and the front half loses a lot of its feeling of forward motion. "So, uh...you're still playing that riff, huh? Cool..."harmless wrote:1) Too much production polishdimejinky99 wrote:Cleverman wrote:This is probably for another thread, but I'm of the opinion UK would be more liked if it had been on a better album...say Yield or something. Does that make sense?harmless wrote:I was only worried about that one review implying that Lightning Bolt itself sounded more like Unthought Known than it had already, played live, and also that half of the songs were entertaining but less challenging rock songs a la Backspacer. Having said that though, there are also less challenging rock songs on Riot Act and Binaural ('Get Right is a cool but uncomplicated song, so is Green Disease), so are we getting anything wildly different than normal? Possibly not.dimejinky99 wrote:harmless wrote:The whole thing about Stone saying "It's going to alienate people, like No Code did" in the first session, and then saying "It sounds like Pearl Jam" in the second, doesn't have to be explained by a move from freaky awesomeness to Backspacer 2, by the way. It could just be that he was told to reign it in, don't say our new album will alienate, you'll put everyone off, etc. It doesn't necessarily indicate what kind of music he was referring to, just that the later quote was less revealing in its info. If anything, if this album is any move away from Backspacer at all, he may have felt the need to warn the pop fans about it. You know, all those people who have got on board since Backspacer...
In fairness a severe left turn artistically was predicted and expected after the last one.
I'm not buying the logical extension argument at all apart from that one song being a left over.
Sometimes songs don't find their place til later. Pj have demonstrated this often in the past.
I've often felt that about UK too. It's pretty much got that classic PJ stamp all over it.
Never understood why it didn't get more love here.
2) Not good structurally; the last third goes nowhere
3) Brendan's piano ruins it
To me, it was always time to hit the skip button once the "nothing left"s started up.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM