
I get the feeling this was the look on millions of American's faces when they got their first pay check after the FICA holiday expiration. Wait a minute... my taxes pay for social security and medicare?

Watched that last night. Made me pretty upset.dkfan9 wrote:Really good, from Frontline: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/untouchables/
While bing lazy and not taking the time to watch some of the video, I've always wondered exactly what crimes are available that one could charge with.cutuphalfdead wrote:Watched that last night. Made me pretty upset.dkfan9 wrote:Really good, from Frontline: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/untouchables/
They were making the case for fraud. Pretty much due diligence workers looking at all these loans were saying they were full of shit but there was pressure from the top to never use the "f" word and when they were brought to the attention of higher ups they'd just say "everything looks reasonable to me".Green Habit wrote:While bing lazy and not taking the time to watch some of the video, I've always wondered exactly what crimes are available that one could charge with.cutuphalfdead wrote:Watched that last night. Made me pretty upset.dkfan9 wrote:Really good, from Frontline: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/untouchables/
In other words we cannot puursue any crime that could cause investors to sstop pouring money in the markets.MARTIN SMITH: You gave a speech before the New York Bar Association. And in that speech, you made a reference to losing sleep at night, worrying about what a lawsuit might result in at a large financial institution.
LANNY BREUER: Right.
MARTIN SMITH: Is that really the job of a prosecutor, to worry about anything other than simply pursuing justice?
LANNY BREUER: Well, I think I am pursuing justice. And I think the entire responsibility of the department is to pursue justice. But in any given case, I think I and prosecutors around the country, being responsible, should speak to regulators, should speak to experts, because if I bring a case against institution A, and as a result of bringing that case, there’s some huge economic effect — if it creates a ripple effect so that suddenly, counterparties and other financial institutions or other companies that had nothing to do with this are affected badly — it’s a factor we need to know and understand.
Yeah, it's horseshit. It's not like the government doesn't have the resources to backstop institutions if needed anyway.broken iris wrote:Stolen from Zerohedge (and BTW, Eric Holder fired Lanny Breuer yesterday over publically admitting all this in "Untouchables")
In other words we cannot puursue any crime that could cause investors to sstop pouring money in the markets.MARTIN SMITH: You gave a speech before the New York Bar Association. And in that speech, you made a reference to losing sleep at night, worrying about what a lawsuit might result in at a large financial institution.
LANNY BREUER: Right.
MARTIN SMITH: Is that really the job of a prosecutor, to worry about anything other than simply pursuing justice?
LANNY BREUER: Well, I think I am pursuing justice. And I think the entire responsibility of the department is to pursue justice. But in any given case, I think I and prosecutors around the country, being responsible, should speak to regulators, should speak to experts, because if I bring a case against institution A, and as a result of bringing that case, there’s some huge economic effect — if it creates a ripple effect so that suddenly, counterparties and other financial institutions or other companies that had nothing to do with this are affected badly — it’s a factor we need to know and understand.
Lehman brothers was a mistake, eh?dkfan9 wrote:Yeah, it's horseshit. It's not like the government doesn't have the resources to backstop institutions if needed anyway.broken iris wrote:Stolen from Zerohedge (and BTW, Eric Holder fired Lanny Breuer yesterday over publically admitting all this in "Untouchables")
In other words we cannot puursue any crime that could cause investors to sstop pouring money in the markets.MARTIN SMITH: You gave a speech before the New York Bar Association. And in that speech, you made a reference to losing sleep at night, worrying about what a lawsuit might result in at a large financial institution.
LANNY BREUER: Right.
MARTIN SMITH: Is that really the job of a prosecutor, to worry about anything other than simply pursuing justice?
LANNY BREUER: Well, I think I am pursuing justice. And I think the entire responsibility of the department is to pursue justice. But in any given case, I think I and prosecutors around the country, being responsible, should speak to regulators, should speak to experts, because if I bring a case against institution A, and as a result of bringing that case, there’s some huge economic effect — if it creates a ripple effect so that suddenly, counterparties and other financial institutions or other companies that had nothing to do with this are affected badly — it’s a factor we need to know and understand.
I don't know that it mattered much in the end (of course it was an important event at the time). But if the government's concern is the stability of the system, and they believe that prosecuting high officials (hint: not entire organizations) will endanger that stability, the government has the ability to maintain financial stability if it wishes to do so. Therefore, concerns about financial stability shouldn't even have the chance to enter the prosecutor's mind.simple schoolboy wrote:Lehman brothers was a mistake, eh?dkfan9 wrote:Yeah, it's horseshit. It's not like the government doesn't have the resources to backstop institutions if needed anyway.broken iris wrote:Stolen from Zerohedge (and BTW, Eric Holder fired Lanny Breuer yesterday over publically admitting all this in "Untouchables")
In other words we cannot puursue any crime that could cause investors to sstop pouring money in the markets.MARTIN SMITH: You gave a speech before the New York Bar Association. And in that speech, you made a reference to losing sleep at night, worrying about what a lawsuit might result in at a large financial institution.
LANNY BREUER: Right.
MARTIN SMITH: Is that really the job of a prosecutor, to worry about anything other than simply pursuing justice?
LANNY BREUER: Well, I think I am pursuing justice. And I think the entire responsibility of the department is to pursue justice. But in any given case, I think I and prosecutors around the country, being responsible, should speak to regulators, should speak to experts, because if I bring a case against institution A, and as a result of bringing that case, there’s some huge economic effect — if it creates a ripple effect so that suddenly, counterparties and other financial institutions or other companies that had nothing to do with this are affected badly — it’s a factor we need to know and understand.
This.dkfan9 wrote: But if the government's concern is the stability of the system, and they believe that prosecuting high officials (hint: not entire organizations) will endanger that stability, the government has the ability to maintain financial stability if it wishes to do so. Therefore, concerns about financial stability shouldn't even have the chance to enter the prosecutor's mind.
Well, overall I do think backstopping the financial system in a crisis is important to avoid the most catastrophic outcomes, even though preventing catastrophe has its own undesirable long term effects (moral hazard, for one; for another, the great depression got rid of a lot of debt through default, paving the way for the postwar boom). To what degree that requires backing individual institutions is another question (as is how those institutions should be treated in the longer run--whether the backstopping should be temporary, followed by liquidation of some sort, for example).simple schoolboy wrote:I read the bit about backstopping institutions as meaning that because the feds can, they should. I suppose that wasn't necessarily what you were getting at.
this is a serious question: are rich Chinese people moving to that area of the country in somewhat large numbers?doug rr wrote:I dont know what it's like in other areas of the country right now but residential real estate is getting frothy again here...every open house I go to lately on listings that just hit the market are having multiple bids and selling way over listing.
not at all, this is LA not Vancouver BCdkfan9 wrote:this is a serious question: are rich Chinese people moving to that area of the country in somewhat large numbers?doug rr wrote:I dont know what it's like in other areas of the country right now but residential real estate is getting frothy again here...every open house I go to lately on listings that just hit the market are having multiple bids and selling way over listing.
i wonder how cold thodoks is right now.doug rr wrote:not at all, this is LA not Vancouver BCdkfan9 wrote:this is a serious question: are rich Chinese people moving to that area of the country in somewhat large numbers?doug rr wrote:I dont know what it's like in other areas of the country right now but residential real estate is getting frothy again here...every open house I go to lately on listings that just hit the market are having multiple bids and selling way over listing.
I dont know if he's posting here or not now...actually the chinese money is drying up at pretty quik pace in Vancouver as well..3 months ago I had my choice of houses here but now it's its way too difficult..it reminds me of NYC real estate at the start of about 2004-5dkfan9 wrote:i wonder how cold thodoks is right now.doug rr wrote:not at all, this is LA not Vancouver BCdkfan9 wrote:this is a serious question: are rich Chinese people moving to that area of the country in somewhat large numbers?doug rr wrote:I dont know what it's like in other areas of the country right now but residential real estate is getting frothy again here...every open house I go to lately on listings that just hit the market are having multiple bids and selling way over listing.
also, i'm in ohio, so i see no housing froth, and no matter whether a bubble happens, i probably won't see too much.
i guess my moving to california plans are falling to the waysidedoug rr wrote:I dont know if he's posting here or not now...actually the chinese money is drying up at pretty quik pace in Vancouver as well..3 months ago I had my choice of houses here but now it's its way too difficult..it reminds me of NYC real estate at the start of about 2004-5dkfan9 wrote:i wonder how cold thodoks is right now.doug rr wrote:not at all, this is LA not Vancouver BCdkfan9 wrote:this is a serious question: are rich Chinese people moving to that area of the country in somewhat large numbers?doug rr wrote:I dont know what it's like in other areas of the country right now but residential real estate is getting frothy again here...every open house I go to lately on listings that just hit the market are having multiple bids and selling way over listing.
also, i'm in ohio, so i see no housing froth, and no matter whether a bubble happens, i probably won't see too much.
depends on where you want to live...still plenty of affordable stuff out there...it's just that west LA near the ocean is getting ridiculous..And San Fran is always bat shit crazy expensivedkfan9 wrote:i guess my moving to california plans are falling to the waysidedoug rr wrote:I dont know if he's posting here or not now...actually the chinese money is drying up at pretty quik pace in Vancouver as well..3 months ago I had my choice of houses here but now it's its way too difficult..it reminds me of NYC real estate at the start of about 2004-5dkfan9 wrote:i wonder how cold thodoks is right now.doug rr wrote:not at all, this is LA not Vancouver BCdkfan9 wrote:this is a serious question: are rich Chinese people moving to that area of the country in somewhat large numbers?doug rr wrote:I dont know what it's like in other areas of the country right now but residential real estate is getting frothy again here...every open house I go to lately on listings that just hit the market are having multiple bids and selling way over listing.
also, i'm in ohio, so i see no housing froth, and no matter whether a bubble happens, i probably won't see too much.