Star Trek: Picard

Books, movies, television...
Post Reply
JuanHamm
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 6950
Joined: Wed May 30, 2018 6:10 pm

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by JuanHamm »

Noah Hawley is amazing. I didn't actually know he was writing and directing a star trek movie's, that is really good news. I'm sure it will be great.
Nihilist lives don't matter
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by epilogue »

McParadigm wrote:What is the general ST news thread? I’m torn about a lot of the news coming out of the new movie, but....
Hawley also expounded on his vision somewhat, referencing 1982's Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, widely considered to be a high point for Trek.

"It's William Shatner putting on his reading glasses and lowering Khan's shields, which cost like $9.50. There's no big action sequence. He's just more clever," Hawley said, recalling a key scene. "There's something really uplifting about that feeling. I went to Paramount and just had my own ideas for what I wanted to do with it. So that's the direction that I'm going in. It's still very early days, so I can't really be more specific. But it's going to be different."
Much more excited about Hawley's take on ST than QT's. This is exciting.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by Simple Torture »

McParadigm wrote:What is the general ST news thread?
http://forums.theskyiscrape.com/viewtop ... 49#p500249

Image
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by bada »

durdencommatyler wrote:
McParadigm wrote:What is the general ST news thread? I’m torn about a lot of the news coming out of the new movie, but....
Hawley also expounded on his vision somewhat, referencing 1982's Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, widely considered to be a high point for Trek.

"It's William Shatner putting on his reading glasses and lowering Khan's shields, which cost like $9.50. There's no big action sequence. He's just more clever," Hawley said, recalling a key scene. "There's something really uplifting about that feeling. I went to Paramount and just had my own ideas for what I wanted to do with it. So that's the direction that I'm going in. It's still very early days, so I can't really be more specific. But it's going to be different."
Much more excited about Hawley's take on ST than QT's. This is exciting.
I heard investors have no interest in Bad Robot or Hawleys Trek. They cant get the financing to make a new movie. The news coming out about Hawley's Trek is to try and get some internet buzz going and maybe get investors to give it a shot. It's basically dead. Not gonna happen.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by epilogue »

bada wrote:
durdencommatyler wrote:
McParadigm wrote:What is the general ST news thread? I’m torn about a lot of the news coming out of the new movie, but....
Hawley also expounded on his vision somewhat, referencing 1982's Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan, widely considered to be a high point for Trek.

"It's William Shatner putting on his reading glasses and lowering Khan's shields, which cost like $9.50. There's no big action sequence. He's just more clever," Hawley said, recalling a key scene. "There's something really uplifting about that feeling. I went to Paramount and just had my own ideas for what I wanted to do with it. So that's the direction that I'm going in. It's still very early days, so I can't really be more specific. But it's going to be different."
Much more excited about Hawley's take on ST than QT's. This is exciting.
I heard investors have no interest in Bad Robot or Hawleys Trek. They cant get the financing to make a new movie. The news coming out about Hawley's Trek is to try and get some internet buzz going and maybe get investors to give it a shot. It's basically dead. Not gonna happen.
Either way, I'm more interested in a POTENTIAL Hawley Trek than any kind of QT Trek.
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by bada »

Yeah I really like Hawley. Maybe they'll give him a TV show.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by epilogue »

bada wrote:Yeah I really like Hawley. Maybe they'll give him a TV show.
That would be baller.
User avatar
dimejinky99
what on earth am I talking about
Posts: 39789
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by dimejinky99 »

Oh wow. Yes. Wow. YES

https://fbwat.ch/1v96eqQ1mVEA7CBc
Calibrate your enthusiasm
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by bada »

Saw the first episode. Enjoyed it. All the dire prognostications I've seen online seem to be vastly overblown....unless it goes to shit in latter episodes.
Revelator
AnalLog
Posts: 1931
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 8:29 pm

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by Revelator »

I haven't signed up for CBS All Access yet but may have to break down this weekend. I'm a huge TNG fan and the reviews thus far have been pretty stellar. Last I checked it was sitting at 91% on RT
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by McParadigm »

I fucking love the work they’ve done writing for Picard himself. It’s great to see him written in part by people who grew up with and respect the character, who understand the qualities that make him beloved, but who also are willing to adapt that template to their own ideas.

I could see scenarios where it doesn’t live up to this episode, but so far it’s great.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by 96583UP »

enough of this poppycock

CBS All Access is a ripoff
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by McParadigm »

The dialog when he’s soothing that one particular character outside his home, talking her through a traumatic moment of self-discovery, captures textures of Picard’s empathy that are usually only communicated in Patrick’s eyes. 90’s tv only had so much patience for non-expository dialog, and the movies.....yeeeesh.

Whatever else this show may do, it just feels like the writing for the only character that matters is right.

Not sure how I feel about the story yet, not because I have any complaints about what we just got but because it’s hard for me to see it not landing in a way that’s sorta JJesque.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by Simple Torture »

McParadigm wrote:Not sure how I feel about the story yet, not because I have any complaints about what we just got but because it’s hard for me to see it not landing in a way that’s sorta JJesque.
I would say, on this front, at least he knows who he's looking for and why she's important. I was all too worried that he and Daughter were going to have to go on a bunch of madcap adventures just to figure out who she was and what her role in the galaxy was. Dumping it all in the first episode meant a lot of explaining, but at least they didn't drag it out.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by McParadigm »

Also half the walk ons he’s acting against are terrible actors, so it really feels like Star Trek.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by Simple Torture »

I'm sure it wasn't intentional but they should definitely lean into it.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by McParadigm »

Just livin my life, digging the new Pearl Jam and checking that new Star Trek show where Patrick Stewart stars. Why what year is it
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by Simple Torture »

McParadigm wrote:Just livin my life, digging the new Pearl Jam and checking that new Star Trek show where Patrick Stewart stars. Why what year is it
Image
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by McParadigm »

Oh if only
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
bada
Looks Like a Cat
Posts: 12504
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:53 pm

Re: Star Trek: Picard

Post by bada »

Think if Q comes back they de-age him or have him look old and taunt Picard that he didn't want him to look like death alone?
Post Reply