Simple Torture wrote:On today of all days, how dare you.Electromatic wrote:Red Sock
My deepest apologies for my ignorance.
Simple Torture wrote:On today of all days, how dare you.Electromatic wrote:Red Sock
Well, at least you're out from under the Price deal now, that should give the new front office some room to breathe.numbers wrote:All of this traces back to the original sin, lowballing Lester. That led to the overspending on starting pitching, which led to this.Electromatic wrote:David Price is the kind of contract you fire the GM for signing. That cost Betts. To get out from under that incredible disaster of a deal they had to trade one of the best players in baseball at 27.
Perhaps it's somewhat Ironic, but Frank Wren, who brought the brothers Upton to Atlanta was recently working for the Sox as some sort of adviser (he may still be I'm not sure)
When Melvin BJ Upton's contract needed to be moved because it was so awful, it cost the Braves former Red Sock, Craig Kimbrel in the process.
I don't think the specific numbers have been released yet, but Boston is expected to retain something like half of Price's deal. So they're paying him $16 million to pitch for LA instead of $32 million to play for Boston. I wouldn't say they "got out from under" it.Electromatic wrote:Well, at least you're out from under the Price deal now, that should give the new front office some room to breathe.numbers wrote:All of this traces back to the original sin, lowballing Lester. That led to the overspending on starting pitching, which led to this.Electromatic wrote:David Price is the kind of contract you fire the GM for signing. That cost Betts. To get out from under that incredible disaster of a deal they had to trade one of the best players in baseball at 27.
Perhaps it's somewhat Ironic, but Frank Wren, who brought the brothers Upton to Atlanta was recently working for the Sox as some sort of adviser (he may still be I'm not sure)
When Melvin BJ Upton's contract needed to be moved because it was so awful, it cost the Braves former Red Sock, Craig Kimbrel in the process.
philpritchard wrote:I don't think the specific numbers have been released yet, but Boston is expected to retain something like half of Price's deal. So they're paying him $16 million to pitch for LA instead of $32 million to play for Boston. I wouldn't say they "got out from under" it.Electromatic wrote:Well, at least you're out from under the Price deal now, that should give the new front office some room to breathe.numbers wrote:All of this traces back to the original sin, lowballing Lester. That led to the overspending on starting pitching, which led to this.Electromatic wrote:David Price is the kind of contract you fire the GM for signing. That cost Betts. To get out from under that incredible disaster of a deal they had to trade one of the best players in baseball at 27.
Perhaps it's somewhat Ironic, but Frank Wren, who brought the brothers Upton to Atlanta was recently working for the Sox as some sort of adviser (he may still be I'm not sure)
When Melvin BJ Upton's contract needed to be moved because it was so awful, it cost the Braves former Red Sock, Craig Kimbrel in the process.
I kind of look at it as Price for nothing and Betts for Verdugo and Graterol.Electromatic wrote:They're still paying half and they lost Betts? Wow, Ouch.philpritchard wrote:I don't think the specific numbers have been released yet, but Boston is expected to retain something like half of Price's deal. So they're paying him $16 million to pitch for LA instead of $32 million to play for Boston. I wouldn't say they "got out from under" it.Electromatic wrote:Well, at least you're out from under the Price deal now, that should give the new front office some room to breathe.numbers wrote:All of this traces back to the original sin, lowballing Lester. That led to the overspending on starting pitching, which led to this.Electromatic wrote:David Price is the kind of contract you fire the GM for signing. That cost Betts. To get out from under that incredible disaster of a deal they had to trade one of the best players in baseball at 27.
Perhaps it's somewhat Ironic, but Frank Wren, who brought the brothers Upton to Atlanta was recently working for the Sox as some sort of adviser (he may still be I'm not sure)
When Melvin BJ Upton's contract needed to be moved because it was so awful, it cost the Braves former Red Sock, Craig Kimbrel in the process.
I hate even speculating on this stuff because it feels like acceptance that this was OK, but I have to think they could have split the Price and Betts trades and gotten more for Betts. There wasnt one team in MLB willing to take on half of Price's money at no additional cost?philpritchard wrote:I kind of look at it as Price for nothing and Betts for Verdugo and Graterol.Electromatic wrote:They're still paying half and they lost Betts? Wow, Ouch.philpritchard wrote:I don't think the specific numbers have been released yet, but Boston is expected to retain something like half of Price's deal. So they're paying him $16 million to pitch for LA instead of $32 million to play for Boston. I wouldn't say they "got out from under" it.Electromatic wrote:Well, at least you're out from under the Price deal now, that should give the new front office some room to breathe.numbers wrote:All of this traces back to the original sin, lowballing Lester. That led to the overspending on starting pitching, which led to this.Electromatic wrote:David Price is the kind of contract you fire the GM for signing. That cost Betts. To get out from under that incredible disaster of a deal they had to trade one of the best players in baseball at 27.
Perhaps it's somewhat Ironic, but Frank Wren, who brought the brothers Upton to Atlanta was recently working for the Sox as some sort of adviser (he may still be I'm not sure)
When Melvin BJ Upton's contract needed to be moved because it was so awful, it cost the Braves former Red Sock, Craig Kimbrel in the process.
Price might be insufferable, but he's still pretty good this shouldnt have been like offloading Pablo Sandoval.numbers wrote:I hate even speculating on this stuff because it feels like acceptance that this was OK, but I have to think they could have split the Price and Betts trades and gotten more for Betts. There wasnt one team in MLB willing to take on half of Price's money at no additional cost?philpritchard wrote:I kind of look at it as Price for nothing and Betts for Verdugo and Graterol.Electromatic wrote:They're still paying half and they lost Betts? Wow, Ouch.philpritchard wrote:I don't think the specific numbers have been released yet, but Boston is expected to retain something like half of Price's deal. So they're paying him $16 million to pitch for LA instead of $32 million to play for Boston. I wouldn't say they "got out from under" it.Electromatic wrote:Well, at least you're out from under the Price deal now, that should give the new front office some room to breathe.numbers wrote:All of this traces back to the original sin, lowballing Lester. That led to the overspending on starting pitching, which led to this.Electromatic wrote:David Price is the kind of contract you fire the GM for signing. That cost Betts. To get out from under that incredible disaster of a deal they had to trade one of the best players in baseball at 27.
Perhaps it's somewhat Ironic, but Frank Wren, who brought the brothers Upton to Atlanta was recently working for the Sox as some sort of adviser (he may still be I'm not sure)
When Melvin BJ Upton's contract needed to be moved because it was so awful, it cost the Braves former Red Sock, Craig Kimbrel in the process.
I think Verdugo and Graterol was about the best you could expect for a rental, even a superstar like Betts. Teams have started placing so much value on years of cheap control that you don't see huge prospect returns for one year rentals anymore.numbers wrote:I hate even speculating on this stuff because it feels like acceptance that this was OK, but I have to think they could have split the Price and Betts trades and gotten more for Betts. There wasnt one team in MLB willing to take on half of Price's money at no additional cost?
McParadigm wrote:lol
Is Pablo hated in Boston?numbers wrote:Price might be insufferable, but he's still pretty good this shouldnt have been like offloading Pablo Sandoval.
Every sentence in my head, someone else has said.