Boston Red Sox Thread

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Electromatic »

Simple Torture wrote:
Electromatic wrote:Red Sock
On today of all days, how dare you.

My deepest apologies for my ignorance.
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Electromatic »

numbers wrote:
Electromatic wrote:David Price is the kind of contract you fire the GM for signing. That cost Betts. To get out from under that incredible disaster of a deal they had to trade one of the best players in baseball at 27.

Perhaps it's somewhat Ironic, but Frank Wren, who brought the brothers Upton to Atlanta was recently working for the Sox as some sort of adviser (he may still be I'm not sure)

When Melvin BJ Upton's contract needed to be moved because it was so awful, it cost the Braves former Red Sock, Craig Kimbrel in the process.
All of this traces back to the original sin, lowballing Lester. That led to the overspending on starting pitching, which led to this.
Well, at least you're out from under the Price deal now, that should give the new front office some room to breathe.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

They had Price, Martinez, and Eovaldi locked in at $70+ million for multiple years, and when those kinds of commitments led to questions about how long they could keep the team together, they extended Sale and Bogaerts for another $50 million long term.

We've discussed ownership/payroll quite a bit here, and I continue to believe every team is always going to have a spending limit somewhere (though I get the argument that a guy like Betts is probably worth making an exception for), but there were a bunch of poor and/or short-term decisions that got them to the point of having to clear payroll.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

Electromatic wrote:
numbers wrote:
Electromatic wrote:David Price is the kind of contract you fire the GM for signing. That cost Betts. To get out from under that incredible disaster of a deal they had to trade one of the best players in baseball at 27.

Perhaps it's somewhat Ironic, but Frank Wren, who brought the brothers Upton to Atlanta was recently working for the Sox as some sort of adviser (he may still be I'm not sure)

When Melvin BJ Upton's contract needed to be moved because it was so awful, it cost the Braves former Red Sock, Craig Kimbrel in the process.
All of this traces back to the original sin, lowballing Lester. That led to the overspending on starting pitching, which led to this.
Well, at least you're out from under the Price deal now, that should give the new front office some room to breathe.
I don't think the specific numbers have been released yet, but Boston is expected to retain something like half of Price's deal. So they're paying him $16 million to pitch for LA instead of $32 million to play for Boston. I wouldn't say they "got out from under" it.
Electromatic
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3679
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Electromatic »

philpritchard wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
numbers wrote:
Electromatic wrote:David Price is the kind of contract you fire the GM for signing. That cost Betts. To get out from under that incredible disaster of a deal they had to trade one of the best players in baseball at 27.

Perhaps it's somewhat Ironic, but Frank Wren, who brought the brothers Upton to Atlanta was recently working for the Sox as some sort of adviser (he may still be I'm not sure)

When Melvin BJ Upton's contract needed to be moved because it was so awful, it cost the Braves former Red Sock, Craig Kimbrel in the process.
All of this traces back to the original sin, lowballing Lester. That led to the overspending on starting pitching, which led to this.
Well, at least you're out from under the Price deal now, that should give the new front office some room to breathe.
I don't think the specific numbers have been released yet, but Boston is expected to retain something like half of Price's deal. So they're paying him $16 million to pitch for LA instead of $32 million to play for Boston. I wouldn't say they "got out from under" it.

They're still paying half and they lost Betts? Wow, Ouch.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

Electromatic wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
numbers wrote:
Electromatic wrote:David Price is the kind of contract you fire the GM for signing. That cost Betts. To get out from under that incredible disaster of a deal they had to trade one of the best players in baseball at 27.

Perhaps it's somewhat Ironic, but Frank Wren, who brought the brothers Upton to Atlanta was recently working for the Sox as some sort of adviser (he may still be I'm not sure)

When Melvin BJ Upton's contract needed to be moved because it was so awful, it cost the Braves former Red Sock, Craig Kimbrel in the process.
All of this traces back to the original sin, lowballing Lester. That led to the overspending on starting pitching, which led to this.
Well, at least you're out from under the Price deal now, that should give the new front office some room to breathe.
I don't think the specific numbers have been released yet, but Boston is expected to retain something like half of Price's deal. So they're paying him $16 million to pitch for LA instead of $32 million to play for Boston. I wouldn't say they "got out from under" it.
They're still paying half and they lost Betts? Wow, Ouch.
I kind of look at it as Price for nothing and Betts for Verdugo and Graterol.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

philpritchard wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
numbers wrote:
Electromatic wrote:David Price is the kind of contract you fire the GM for signing. That cost Betts. To get out from under that incredible disaster of a deal they had to trade one of the best players in baseball at 27.

Perhaps it's somewhat Ironic, but Frank Wren, who brought the brothers Upton to Atlanta was recently working for the Sox as some sort of adviser (he may still be I'm not sure)

When Melvin BJ Upton's contract needed to be moved because it was so awful, it cost the Braves former Red Sock, Craig Kimbrel in the process.
All of this traces back to the original sin, lowballing Lester. That led to the overspending on starting pitching, which led to this.
Well, at least you're out from under the Price deal now, that should give the new front office some room to breathe.
I don't think the specific numbers have been released yet, but Boston is expected to retain something like half of Price's deal. So they're paying him $16 million to pitch for LA instead of $32 million to play for Boston. I wouldn't say they "got out from under" it.
They're still paying half and they lost Betts? Wow, Ouch.
I kind of look at it as Price for nothing and Betts for Verdugo and Graterol.
I hate even speculating on this stuff because it feels like acceptance that this was OK, but I have to think they could have split the Price and Betts trades and gotten more for Betts. There wasnt one team in MLB willing to take on half of Price's money at no additional cost?
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

numbers wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
philpritchard wrote:
Electromatic wrote:
numbers wrote:
Electromatic wrote:David Price is the kind of contract you fire the GM for signing. That cost Betts. To get out from under that incredible disaster of a deal they had to trade one of the best players in baseball at 27.

Perhaps it's somewhat Ironic, but Frank Wren, who brought the brothers Upton to Atlanta was recently working for the Sox as some sort of adviser (he may still be I'm not sure)

When Melvin BJ Upton's contract needed to be moved because it was so awful, it cost the Braves former Red Sock, Craig Kimbrel in the process.
All of this traces back to the original sin, lowballing Lester. That led to the overspending on starting pitching, which led to this.
Well, at least you're out from under the Price deal now, that should give the new front office some room to breathe.
I don't think the specific numbers have been released yet, but Boston is expected to retain something like half of Price's deal. So they're paying him $16 million to pitch for LA instead of $32 million to play for Boston. I wouldn't say they "got out from under" it.
They're still paying half and they lost Betts? Wow, Ouch.
I kind of look at it as Price for nothing and Betts for Verdugo and Graterol.
I hate even speculating on this stuff because it feels like acceptance that this was OK, but I have to think they could have split the Price and Betts trades and gotten more for Betts. There wasnt one team in MLB willing to take on half of Price's money at no additional cost?
Price might be insufferable, but he's still pretty good this shouldnt have been like offloading Pablo Sandoval.
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

numbers wrote:I hate even speculating on this stuff because it feels like acceptance that this was OK, but I have to think they could have split the Price and Betts trades and gotten more for Betts. There wasnt one team in MLB willing to take on half of Price's money at no additional cost?
I think Verdugo and Graterol was about the best you could expect for a rental, even a superstar like Betts. Teams have started placing so much value on years of cheap control that you don't see huge prospect returns for one year rentals anymore.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

HEY, I'M GONNA POST SOMETHING POSITIVE--this lineup could still be really good!
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Coach
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8333
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:20 am

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Coach »

Let's trade arguably the best player in baseball at age 27!

Lots of bad choices led to this...
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

Yeah, if getting under the luxury tax in 2020 was such an imperative, the last offseason is completely nonsensical. This idea that Dombrowski signed Sale and Eovaldi behind their backs(but not Bogaerts, they signed off on that one!) is absurd.
User avatar
Matters
Future Drummer
Posts: 2718
Joined: Tue December 24, 2019 8:48 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Matters »

numbers wrote:Price might be insufferable, but he's still pretty good this shouldnt have been like offloading Pablo Sandoval.
Is Pablo hated in Boston?
Every sentence in my head, someone else has said.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

Not really, he wasn’t liked, but I wouldn’t say hated.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

I’ve been so preoccupied with anger about the state of this team that I hadn’t really been thinking about the upcoming season. They still have a pretty good lineup, but this team feels like a house of cards. They have very little depth and no pitching. Their rotation already is a man short and two of those guys are probably around 80% chance of being on the DL for an extended period of time. I love what E-Rod did last year, but I don’t love relying on him to be the anchor of a pitching staff. Why they didn’t bring Porcello back is beyond me.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

Now that the numbers are public, I am INFURIATED about Brock Holt being gone.
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21560
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Simple Torture »

If you need me, I'll be crying somewhere.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
philpritchard
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4155
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 3:45 pm

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by philpritchard »

I'm sure a new good bench player will show up before too long to capture your hearts.
User avatar
numbers
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9200
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
Location: Franklin, MA

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by numbers »

I get what you’re saying but Holt was much more than that.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37328
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Boston Red Sox Thread

Post by Norah »

I have one of these on my desk at work.
Post Reply