Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23453
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by Anders »

Image

Here’s someone I don’t mind preaching.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by Ms Harmless »

Anders wrote:Image

Here’s someone I don’t mind preaching.
hail hail!
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by verb_to_trust »

I'm not caught up on the thread yet, but carbon footprint stuff aside, wouldn't playing a private event for rich corporate guys be a huge turnoff for basically anyone normal? He doesn't need the money. Why would he want to do this? Are the ten club weirdos so annoying that stuff like this is now preferable?
Dick/Balls
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by Strat »

verb_to_trust wrote:I'm not caught up on the thread yet, but carbon footprint stuff aside, wouldn't playing a private event for rich corporate guys be a huge turnoff for basically anyone normal? He doesn't need the money. Why would he want to do this? Are the ten club weirdos so annoying that stuff like this is now preferable?
Probably yes to your last point!

he was photographed with Chelios, who's a good friend of his. So who knows.
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by verb_to_trust »

Anders wrote:There’s lots of rich environmental activists out there that preach about people changing how they eat (no meat), how they sort their trash, how they shouldn’t use their fuel car as much. Yet, they themselves fly from city to city on private jets. Worst kind of hypocrites. Worse than Trump, that doesn’t believe in climate change.

DiCaprio comes to mind. Always out on the yacht. If we see Ed on a yacht soon then it's really time to worry.
Dick/Balls
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by Ms Harmless »

verb_to_trust wrote:
Anders wrote:There’s lots of rich environmental activists out there that preach about people changing how they eat (no meat), how they sort their trash, how they shouldn’t use their fuel car as much. Yet, they themselves fly from city to city on private jets. Worst kind of hypocrites. Worse than Trump, that doesn’t believe in climate change.

DiCaprio comes to mind. Always out on the yacht. If we see Ed on a yacht soon then it's really time to worry.
the bar goes down
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16264
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by Birds in Hell »

Ms Harmless wrote:PJ have never really been anti-capitalist; they've always supported philanthropy and big box charity - the truth is you can't be as rich as they are and be at the absolute forefront of economic change; I saw Ed trying to smash Ticketmaster but never the State
I agree, and I also think fans have often read values into these guys that they may not necessarily hold. To be honest, I very much doubt Ed has a thought-out philosophy on this stuff other than the very broad brush strokes.

None of this stuff bothers me or impacts on how I feel about the band's music.

I found the Target commercial far more objectionable only because the TV ad was way too on the nose and directly used the band's music and performance to promote a particular store. It just seemed cheap.
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23453
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by Anders »

I don’t mind the Target commercial at all. It’s just a way to make money, that doesn’t do any harm to others.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by Ms Harmless »

Birds in Hell wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:PJ have never really been anti-capitalist; they've always supported philanthropy and big box charity - the truth is you can't be as rich as they are and be at the absolute forefront of economic change; I saw Ed trying to smash Ticketmaster but never the State
I agree, and I also think fans have often read values into these guys that they may not necessarily hold. To be honest, I very much doubt Ed has a thought-out philosophy on this stuff other than the very broad brush strokes.

None of this stuff bothers me or impacts on how I feel about the band's music.

I found the Target commercial far more objectionable only because the TV ad was way too on the nose and directly used the band's music and performance to promote a particular store. It just seemed cheap.
yep!
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by Ms Harmless »

Anders wrote:I don’t mind the Target commercial at all. It’s just a way to make money, that doesn’t do any harm to others.
all corporations do harm, and explicit shows of support like brand-specific commercials are uncritically complicit in it
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23453
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by Anders »

Ms Harmless wrote:
Anders wrote:I don’t mind the Target commercial at all. It’s just a way to make money, that doesn’t do any harm to others.
all corporations do harm, and explicit shows of support like brand-specific commercials are uncritically complicit in it
Don’t agree with that at all. But the worst kind of corporation is probably one for private jets.
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by Ms Harmless »

Anders wrote:
Ms Harmless wrote:
Anders wrote:I don’t mind the Target commercial at all. It’s just a way to make money, that doesn’t do any harm to others.
all corporations do harm, and explicit shows of support like brand-specific commercials are uncritically complicit in it
Don’t agree with that at all. But the worst kind of corporation is probably one for private jets.
OK
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by 96583UP »

CopperTom wrote:Private shows for Target, a store focused on selling products to average american consumers, v. Private shows for NetJet, a company aimed at providing transportation to the 1%. I'm just saying the PLBMG is strong.
I think the PLBMG hypothesis may have merit but requires further testing before it can be validated

as of now, we remain firmly in the PRAMG regime until additional data becomes available
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
CopperTom
Champion of RM
Posts: 10760
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by CopperTom »

96583UP wrote:
CopperTom wrote:Private shows for Target, a store focused on selling products to average american consumers, v. Private shows for NetJet, a company aimed at providing transportation to the 1%. I'm just saying the PLBMG is strong.
I think the PLBMG hypothesis may have merit but requires further testing before it can be validated

as of now, we remain firmly in the PRAMG regime until additional data becomes available
Fair enough.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by 96583UP »

I should note it is an exciting possibility. It may change the way we think about money-grabbing.

In fact - if it's as you say - perhaps this would represent more of an 'everything-grab'. They don't just want money. They want fame. They want privacy. They want corporate sponsorship. They want street credit. They want celebrity. They want climate activism. They want private jets. They. Want. It. All.

Post- Lightning Bolt Everything Grab

PLBEG
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
WaitingForBluey
Future Drummer
Posts: 2647
Joined: Thu March 21, 2013 1:08 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/homeforbed
Location: Pennsyltucky
Contact:

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by WaitingForBluey »

*drops the mic*
theplatypus wrote:A solo is when the guitar goes twiddly diddly
Ms Harmless
She / Her
Posts: 13605
Joined: Sun January 26, 2020 12:10 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Warwickshire, UK

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by Ms Harmless »

bluestate wrote:*drops the mic*
get off of my fucking stage
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10374
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by liebzz »

This is all two people’s fault:

1) 1993 Kurt Cobain calling PJ sellouts while he was busy making music videos and playing MTV Live and Loud - but somehow forcing Pearl Jam to be “honest”; and

2) 1995 Eddie Vedder driving around in vans and pretending he was in Fugazi.

A.k.a. Pearl Jam has ALWAYS been a big time rock band, and yes, they took principled stances when appropriate, but otherwise never had a cogent anti-corporate stance other than supporting Ralph Nader in 2000. To think that this loose collection of ideals, mostly related to environmental protection made them the big band equivalent of punk purists is just silliness.
User avatar
DWFB
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 265
Joined: Wed January 22, 2020 3:44 pm
Location: Chicagoland

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by DWFB »

I could be way off here and just wanting something pj related to post about but what if these guys planned from the begining to only take a break from the money grab/media whore thing? What about Stone's statement that cobain put a lot of pressure on them and helped them change their sound? Was it because nirvana was selling a lot of albums and they felt they needed that fanbase to do the same and that cobains criticism of them during interviews could harm sales ? Then maybe they just simply couldnt come up with commercially successful song ideas until recent years.
I pledge to be 100% boring and never troll-out again. I will make my interactions here pleasant, like sitting through an agricultural economics class.
User avatar
DWFB
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 265
Joined: Wed January 22, 2020 3:44 pm
Location: Chicagoland

Re: Post-Riot Act Moneygrab

Post by DWFB »

Liebezz, i just saw your post about nirvana after i posted. Good point.
I pledge to be 100% boring and never troll-out again. I will make my interactions here pleasant, like sitting through an agricultural economics class.
Post Reply