what do you thinkThe Town wrote:96583UP wrote:not if there is a more positive alternativeThe Town wrote:If the end result is positive, does that make the hypocrisy ok?96583UP wrote:there is - the name is 'hypocrisy'The Town wrote:There has to be a name for this philosophy.![]()
In this situation is there a more positive alternative?
Choice 1: Accept the invitation to play a private party at the superbowl for an airplane company that solely caters to the bourgeoisie and represents the most polluting form of travel available right now, on the eve of releasing a climate-change themed album; and accept their donation to my charity and use it for good (not confirmed)
or
Choice 2: don't do those things and instead raise money for my charity by promoting a good cause
