Song of the Moment: Future Days
- Mine
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: New Song: Future Days
The striped down version is just Ed playing the chords and singing over it. The melody is very nice though. It's a very pleasant song but i understand why some find it boring.
I think it's a perfect closer though for the same reasons some find it boring.
I think it's a perfect closer though for the same reasons some find it boring.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52023
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: New Song: Future Days
I prefer the stripped down version to the striped one.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36752
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: New Song: Future Days
Yeah guys, it's clearly the Wrigley performance.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: New Song: Future Days
I wonder why 10c wanted it taken down if it was the Wrigley performance. I'm not doubting you, btw.
I guess plans to release a soundboard performance?
I guess plans to release a soundboard performance?
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song: Future Days
My guess is it's a last minute replacement of Better man (live) as a bonus track.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- Lament
- Commissioner
- Posts: 11792
- Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am
Re: New Song: Future Days
If I can quote myself from the third page of the Wrigley Field thread back from like June...
This is totally why. And none of you believed me...Lament wrote:They'll probably play whatever acoustic ballad is the second single as well. They'll put a video of it up on the site, interspersed with behind the scenes footage of the crew setting up and Ed playing on the empty field with his kids.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: New Song: Future Days
no one believes the prophet in his own lifetime
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His
- Lament
- Commissioner
- Posts: 11792
- Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am
-
Tj
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2133
- Joined: Sat February 23, 2013 1:55 am
Re: New Song: Future Days
If it is a wrigley iso and it sounds like it is how come nothing bleeds into the vocal mic.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song: Future Days
It's from the Wrigley show.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- mastaflatch
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1183
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:05 am
Re: New Song: Future Days
Betterman, if i'm not mistaken, was recorded live onstage (in Atlanta?) for the most part and then overdubbed in the studio and fuck me if i hear any audience noise on it.Tj wrote:If it is a wrigley iso and it sounds like it is how come nothing bleeds into the vocal mic.
-
Tj
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2133
- Joined: Sat February 23, 2013 1:55 am
Re: New Song: Future Days
I think Betterman was a recorded soundcheck.mastaflatch wrote:Betterman, if i'm not mistaken, was recorded live onstage (in Atlanta?) for the most part and then overdubbed in the studio and fuck me if i hear any audience noise on it.Tj wrote:If it is a wrigley iso and it sounds like it is how come nothing bleeds into the vocal mic.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35416
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: New Song: Future Days
Tj wrote:I think Betterman was a recorded soundcheck.mastaflatch wrote:Betterman, if i'm not mistaken, was recorded live onstage (in Atlanta?) for the most part and then overdubbed in the studio and fuck me if i hear any audience noise on it.Tj wrote:If it is a wrigley iso and it sounds like it is how come nothing bleeds into the vocal mic.
Nope. Same performance as the Dissident single/atlanta concert. BOB said as much and chud had synced em all up.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16296
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: New Song: Future Days
No, it's definitely (partly) the live version from Atlanta 1994.Tj wrote:I think Betterman was a recorded soundcheck.mastaflatch wrote:Betterman, if i'm not mistaken, was recorded live onstage (in Atlanta?) for the most part and then overdubbed in the studio and fuck me if i hear any audience noise on it.Tj wrote:If it is a wrigley iso and it sounds like it is how come nothing bleeds into the vocal mic.
It's not surprising you can't hear the audience. It's not as though it's an open-mic recording; Ed's guitar would've been fed direct to the desk and the audience would've been miles away from Ed's vocal mic (and facing in the other direction to boot).
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37453
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: New Song: Future Days
Yep, the reason why you hear the audience so well on official boots is because there are crowd microphones.Birds in Hell wrote:No, it's definitely (partly) the live version from Atlanta 1994.Tj wrote:I think Betterman was a recorded soundcheck.mastaflatch wrote:Betterman, if i'm not mistaken, was recorded live onstage (in Atlanta?) for the most part and then overdubbed in the studio and fuck me if i hear any audience noise on it.Tj wrote:If it is a wrigley iso and it sounds like it is how come nothing bleeds into the vocal mic.
It's not surprising you can't hear the audience. It's not as though it's an open-mic recording; Ed's guitar would've been fed direct to the desk and the audience would've been miles away from Ed's vocal mic (and facing in the other direction to boot).
-
Tj
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2133
- Joined: Sat February 23, 2013 1:55 am
Re: New Song: Future Days
Wtf is there crowd mics for.cutuphalfdead wrote:Yep, the reason why you hear the audience so well on official boots is because there are crowd microphones.Birds in Hell wrote:No, it's definitely (partly) the live version from Atlanta 1994.Tj wrote:I think Betterman was a recorded soundcheck.mastaflatch wrote:Betterman, if i'm not mistaken, was recorded live onstage (in Atlanta?) for the most part and then overdubbed in the studio and fuck me if i hear any audience noise on it.Tj wrote:If it is a wrigley iso and it sounds like it is how come nothing bleeds into the vocal mic.
It's not surprising you can't hear the audience. It's not as though it's an open-mic recording; Ed's guitar would've been fed direct to the desk and the audience would've been miles away from Ed's vocal mic (and facing in the other direction to boot).
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37453
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: New Song: Future Days
So you can hear the crowd too and the bootleg can be more of a representation of being at the show and not just listening to the band's output from the stage.Tj wrote:Wtf is there crowd mics for.cutuphalfdead wrote:Yep, the reason why you hear the audience so well on official boots is because there are crowd microphones.Birds in Hell wrote:No, it's definitely (partly) the live version from Atlanta 1994.Tj wrote:I think Betterman was a recorded soundcheck.mastaflatch wrote:Betterman, if i'm not mistaken, was recorded live onstage (in Atlanta?) for the most part and then overdubbed in the studio and fuck me if i hear any audience noise on it.Tj wrote:If it is a wrigley iso and it sounds like it is how come nothing bleeds into the vocal mic.
It's not surprising you can't hear the audience. It's not as though it's an open-mic recording; Ed's guitar would've been fed direct to the desk and the audience would've been miles away from Ed's vocal mic (and facing in the other direction to boot).
-
gardenparty
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 11:52 pm
Re: New Song: Future Days
It's possible the audience was speechlessTj wrote:If it is a wrigley iso and it sounds like it is how come nothing bleeds into the vocal mic.
- Hatfield
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 8:54 pm
Re: New Song: Future Days
I've never been able to pick it out and just thought BoB was full of shit to make the story of getting around Ed's misgivings a little more mythical. If you can point out which parts they used I would appreciate it.Birds in Hell wrote:No, it's definitely (partly) the live version from Atlanta 1994.Tj wrote:I think Betterman was a recorded soundcheck.mastaflatch wrote:Betterman, if i'm not mistaken, was recorded live onstage (in Atlanta?) for the most part and then overdubbed in the studio and fuck me if i hear any audience noise on it.Tj wrote:If it is a wrigley iso and it sounds like it is how come nothing bleeds into the vocal mic.
It's not surprising you can't hear the audience. It's not as though it's an open-mic recording; Ed's guitar would've been fed direct to the desk and the audience would've been miles away from Ed's vocal mic (and facing in the other direction to boot).
As for Future Days, I'm digging it. I've been on a Thrasher kick lately (really all of Rust Never Sleeps), but the beginning of Thrasher keeps leaving FD in my head.