Yeah, but that was the intent of that. They never actually discussed how to restart the economy, it was just more on racism and inequality... though god bless him Singer (amazing human) tried :verb_to_trust wrote:Yeah, I basically want to kill myself nowRob wrote:Thanks for posting that. That was quite a read.digster wrote:I think for a lot of people, this week felt like you were looking down the barrel of the gun, and I realized until I read this article I really have not been thinking about this more than a month or two ahead. I hadn't really conceived how this could just be the start of a very long upending of pretty much everything.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/10/maga ... ticleShare
“ I think the assumption, and it has been an assumption in this discussion, that we have to do everything to reduce the number of deaths, is not really the right assumption. Because at some point we are willing to trade off loss of life against loss of quality of life. No government puts every dollar it spends into saving lives. And we can’t really keep everything locked down until there won’t be any more deaths. So I think that’s something that needs to come into this discussion. How do we assess the overall cost to everybody in terms of loss of quality of life, loss of well-being, as well as the fact that lives are being lost?”
This fair and important question that needs a serious public debate. Here’s a start:
https://www.project-syndicate.org/comme ... nt-2020-04
