Kevin Davis wrote:matt reeder wrote:I think there's a corollary between how much fans are invested in your music and how disappointed they will inevitably be when their favorite artist inevitably and eventually fails them. The bands on that list, as stupid as it is, are in most part bands that had a long way to fall.
Very true, in all walks of life I think. No one has more power to hurt us than the ones we love the most.
Billy Corgan is a wonderful songwriter--especially during the first few years of the band, I love how the sonic character of the group is not only dressing for but is effectively a built-in part of many of Corgan's compositions. And suffice it to say a mix CD of his best ballads would rank with anyone's. I haven't kept up with Corgan's work post-"Zeitgeist," but I've got 10-12 CD's on my shelf supporting the hypothesis that the dude can write.
With the exception of Eddie, no one person in Pearl Jam is quite as accomplished on a broad scale (whose songs you prefer is, as you say, a matter of preference). But everyone in the band has
virtues as a songwriter, and I guess when I imagine a single songwriter with a combination of those virtues (and, perhaps more importantly, the correct instincts for making that combination work), he mops the floor not only with Corgan but with most songwriters.
Are you not a fan of Stone's songwriting, Matt?
Both Eddie Vedder and Billy Corgan peaked as songwriters from 1993 - 1998. Both wrote some of my favorite songs ever, and I know plenty of people who love one or the other (or both), and plenty of people who hate one or the other (or both). It's a matter of preference. I love both, but they are very different. Since the
Aeroplane Flies High reissue I've been on a huge Smashing Pumpkins kick so right now I'm swinging a lot more towards Billy Corgan. I'm sure when I see PJ this fall I'll spend a good month blasting PJ (and probably even if I hate their new album, which is a distinct possibility).
You're absolutely right about the other members of PJ having virtues as a songwriter. PJ works best when those guys bring in a song and then work together on it. They work best when they focus on each others strengths. PJ is a band that is far superior to the sum of its parts (and I say this as a non-supporter of Eddie's solo career). All five of those guys alone aren't all that much - even Ed and Matt, though those guys are fascinating in their own right. Stone...well, he wrote some of my favorite PJ songs but the only song of his I've liked since 2000 is "Parachutes". Maybe I should try listening to Brad, though the last time I did it didn't end well. Mike and Jeff are just there for me...they don't stand out to me at all as musicians or songwriters. Jeff wrote "Nothing As It Seems" but after hearing the demo, it's a good thing he brought that to the band. I just don't think much of those two or Stone as songwriters on their own. On the other hand, PJ wouldn't be PJ without all five contributing. They're a band, whereas Smashing Pumpkins are essentially a solo project for Billy Corgan. As time goes on, Billy is having more and more trouble deciding what he wants to do with his band, and which songs / albums he should actually release. I firmly believe that with better self-editing, a better understanding of their strengths and weaknesses and a better public image that The Smashing Pumpkins would be remembered as one of the greatest bands ever - but they (and really Billy, though everybody else in that band has contributed as well) simply cannot stop from shooting themselves in the foot. Would people have been disappointed with
Machina if they'd actually released the best 12 - 15 songs recorded during those sessions instead of whatever 15 Billy decided fit his concept?
Perception is everything, which is why the bands on this list are there. Would either
Metallica or
Load have been disappointing if they hadn't been preceded by 4 of the greatest metal albums of all time? Would
Kid A have been given as much attention upon its release if
OK Computer wasn't one of the greatest albums ever recorded? Was
No Code a disappointment just because it sounded different than the previous albums or was it a disappointment because Pearl Jam had moved on while many of its fans had not? Was
Chinese Democracy a disappointment because it couldn't be anything but?
You aren't missing much since
Zeitgeist.
Oceania is pretty good but doesn't compare with anything the original group released. Billy's written and recorded a solid album's worth of material over the last 5 or so years, but of course, only some of that has actually been released. The rest? Who knows why Billy Corgan does what he does.
Fucking Billy Corgan.
