Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by 96583UP »

knee tunes wrote:
B wrote:You don't think the bank teller might question the "deceased" printed after her name?
Not if you signed it that way
use the photo app

assuming you are entitled to her estate proceeds
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
doug rr
The Master
Posts: 27320
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by doug rr »

User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by 96583UP »

for real....

:shock:
With tens of millions of Americans out of work, the Democrats’ bill would also send another round of direct checks to Americans. This time, it would deliver $1,200 for individuals, $2,400 for married couples and $1,200 for each dependent, up to a maximum of three.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/house-demo ... cle_inline
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
Biff Pocoroba
TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
Posts: 4801
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm
Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by Biff Pocoroba »

I'm sure it's been asked in other threads but how is something like a restaurant or airline going to be profitable with 2/3rds capacity?
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40173
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by wease »

Well, here in my town, some restaurants are just going ahead and filling it to the brim. The ideal way would be more turns. Get people in and back out quicker so you can get new asses in the seats to do it all over again.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by elliseamos »

wease wrote:Well, here in my town, some restaurants are just going ahead and filling it to the brim. The ideal way would be more turns. Get people in and back out quicker so you can get new asses in the seats to do it all over again.
Reducing the menu & maybe upping (the already steep) drink mark-up would also make sense.
User avatar
Rob
Future Drummer
Posts: 2887
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 1:46 am
Location: Connecticut

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by Rob »

A full summer at reduced capacity is surely gonna kill a lot of these places. It's a low margin industry. This is borrowed time.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 2:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40173
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by wease »

elliseamos wrote:
wease wrote:Well, here in my town, some restaurants are just going ahead and filling it to the brim. The ideal way would be more turns. Get people in and back out quicker so you can get new asses in the seats to do it all over again.
Reducing the menu & maybe upping (the already steep) drink mark-up would also make sense.
That, too.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by verb_to_trust »

I eat frozen pizzas
Dick/Balls
User avatar
Peeps
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7303
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by Peeps »

verb_to_trust wrote:I eat frozen pizzas

It sounds insane but Walmart’s market side traditional crust I’d fucking incredible for $5
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by 96583UP »

i was saying 'boo-urns'
Speaking on the Senate floor on Thursday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) railed against House Democrats’ bill for expanding stimulus payments to individuals with a taxpayer identification number, not just a Social Security number. That would allow unauthorized immigrants to qualify for the payments.

“Another round of checks for illegal immigrants. Can you believe it?” McConnell said. “We forgot to have the Treasury Department send money to people here illegally. My goodness, what an oversight. Thank goodness Democrats are on the case.”

The House Democratic proposal would provide $1,200 for all individuals — including children — capping the payments at $6,000 per household. The initial round of payments authorized in the Cares Act in late March provided only $500 for children. Like the stimulus checks sent out under the Cares Act, the payments included in House Democrats’ bill would begin to phase out for people with incomes of $75,000 and above.

There are no active bipartisan negotiations underway on the next coronavirus relief bill. McConnell and other Republicans say they want to pause and allow the approximately $3 trillion in spending already approved to make its way into the economy before agreeing to anything more.
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by 96583UP »

wow.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... nd=premium
As it headed toward bankruptcy, Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc. took advantage of a little-noticed provision in the stimulus bill Congress passed in March to get a $9.7 million tax refund. Then, it asked a bankruptcy judge to authorize the same amount as bonuses to nine executives.
More than $1.9 billion in CARES Act tax benefits are being claimed by at least 37 oil companies, service firms and contractors, according to a Bloomberg News review of recent filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Occidental Petroleum, which enlisted its employees to ask Congress to “provide liquidity to the energy industry,” said it now anticipates a cash refund of about $195 million as a result of the carryback provision and a separate change in the stimulus bill that allows the immediate refund of unused alternative minimum tax credits.
National Oilwell Varco Inc., a manufacturer of oil and gas equipment, expects a $123 million refund by carrying back its 2019 losses and applying them to its 2014 tax filing.

San Antonio-based refiner Valero Energy Corp. recognized an extra $110 million by carrying back losses to 2015 -- when the corporate tax rate was 35% instead of the current 21%.
Congressional tax analysts initially estimated that the expanded loss carryback provision would cost $25 billion over 10 years -- just when used by corporations. Now, some are questioning whether the final pricetag could be much higher, and Democrats are seeking to limit the value of the tax break after raising concerns it overwhelmingly helps corporations and the wealthy.

In a new stimulus bill advanced Tuesday, House Democrats proposed scaling back the provision so companies could only apply losses back to 2018. Their plan also would prevent companies with “excessive” executive compensation or stock buybacks from claiming the tax break -- a change that would be retroactive back to March.
heist completed
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
swan
AnalLog
Posts: 1419
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 2:19 am
Location: Portland, OR

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by swan »

Wow, the system’s rigged. Who knew?
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by 96583UP »

good thing WaPo and MSNBC and all those progressive news outlets were ahead of the story

unlike brain-rapist Michael Bloomberg’s shop
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by 96583UP »

can't wait for the next round of bailout checks to be accompanied by a law protecting businesses from liability for Covid infections so all the workers called back to work have a little money toward covering part of their deductible for their forthcoming Covid intubations; or for those who refuse to report for fear of infection and are counted as a quit and ineligible for unemployment insurance have a little money before they have to file for bankruptcy
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by verb_to_trust »

We probably won't get checks. They only want to cut them for poor people.
Dick/Balls
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by B »

So, if Trump's executive order is for everyone to get $400/month, but the state's have to pay $100, why not give everyone $1000/month, but the state's have to pay $700?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
doug rr
The Master
Posts: 27320
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by doug rr »

B wrote:So, if Trump's executive order is for everyone to get $400/month, but the state's have to pay $100, why not give everyone $1000/month, but the state's have to pay $700?
would you buy a microwave with that extra money?
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: Coronavirus Government Bailout Thread

Post by B »

doug rr wrote:
B wrote:So, if Trump's executive order is for everyone to get $400/month, but the state's have to pay $100, why not give everyone $1000/month, but the state's have to pay $700?
would you buy a microwave with that extra money?
Well, if I got another stimulus check, I'd be a step closer to redoing my kitchen, so ... yes.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
Post Reply