Election 2020
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51694
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: Election 2020
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 2:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
doug rr
- The Master
- Posts: 27424
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
- Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos
Re: Election 2020
he's sitting peacefully there....
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52035
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
- VinylGuy
- jeeeesus relax already
- Posts: 43451
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Re: Election 2020
The democrats would never let Michelle Obama to be a candidate.wease wrote:Michelle/Oprah would win so yugely.VinylGuy wrote:OPRAHSuperblood Wolfmoon wrote:Obama is going to the Supreme Court, not VP. The VP pick needs to be someone who can transition the party to the next generation.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: Election 2020
All this talk about finding an overshadowingly popular VP pick is just another manifestation of an electoral insecurity that is, frankly, embarrassing.
Donald Trump is 12 points underwater (with even worse favorability). His own polling shows him losing key swing states, and barely hanging on in other places that shouldn’t even be at risk.
The consistency and volume with which he would have to present a more inviting, less exhausting style of leadership between now and November in order to win is so far beyond him, not even his allies pretend to believe it. The Republican Party expects to lose the Senate.
If you’re the Democratic Party nominee, you don’t need more “popularity” at this point. You need more and more demonstrating that you’re not like the opposition. Clinging to figureheads or empowering celebrities is the worst choice you could make. Pick a capable political policy manager, because that’s what Joe Biden isn’t...and when you win the White House and Senate...you’re going to need a party-level leader who can do that.
Donald Trump is 12 points underwater (with even worse favorability). His own polling shows him losing key swing states, and barely hanging on in other places that shouldn’t even be at risk.
The consistency and volume with which he would have to present a more inviting, less exhausting style of leadership between now and November in order to win is so far beyond him, not even his allies pretend to believe it. The Republican Party expects to lose the Senate.
If you’re the Democratic Party nominee, you don’t need more “popularity” at this point. You need more and more demonstrating that you’re not like the opposition. Clinging to figureheads or empowering celebrities is the worst choice you could make. Pick a capable political policy manager, because that’s what Joe Biden isn’t...and when you win the White House and Senate...you’re going to need a party-level leader who can do that.
(patriotic choking noises)
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52035
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Election 2020
Yeah the language says you can't be elected president for a third term. It doesn't state you can't become it if you are vice president and something happens. Not sure how it would all hold up in court though.Superblood Wolfmoon wrote:I'm not so sure about that. Wouldn't it would just mean that if the president died/resigned/whatever, he'd be skipped over in the chain? He can't serve as president, but that doesn't disqualify him from serving as VP.wease wrote:Barack can’t be Veep. The constitution clearly states he can’t be President again and they can’t put him in the position that might make that possible.Chris_H_2 wrote:BarackBammer wrote:Michelle?Chris_H_2 wrote:Just read an article in the New Yorker and I agree with it. Biden should pick Obama as his running mate. Trump = guaranteed done.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40713
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Election 2020
It also says you can’t run for VP if you are constitutionally ineligible to be president. Obama is ineligible to be president again.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Yeah the language says you can't be elected president for a third term. It doesn't state you can't become it if you are vice president and something happens. Not sure how it would all hold up in court though.Superblood Wolfmoon wrote:I'm not so sure about that. Wouldn't it would just mean that if the president died/resigned/whatever, he'd be skipped over in the chain? He can't serve as president, but that doesn't disqualify him from serving as VP.wease wrote:Barack can’t be Veep. The constitution clearly states he can’t be President again and they can’t put him in the position that might make that possible.Chris_H_2 wrote:BarackBammer wrote:Michelle?Chris_H_2 wrote:Just read an article in the New Yorker and I agree with it. Biden should pick Obama as his running mate. Trump = guaranteed done.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52035
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Election 2020
Oh I know. I've just seen a lot of legal scholars argue that the way the language is, they feel there would be a case to making it work.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
-
doug rr
- The Master
- Posts: 27424
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
- Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos
Re: Election 2020
chris h2?E.H. Ruddock wrote:Oh I know. I've just seen a lot of legal scholars argue that the way the language is, they feel there would be a case to making it work.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52035
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: Election 2020
Here's a basic summary of stuff I've seen in the argument for:
"Again we bump into some problems of literalness, though, because some would argue that a person who has already run up against the limits of the 22nd Amendment isn’t “constitutionally ineligible” to be President (i.e., that person doesn’t fail to meet one or more of the requirements specified in Article II of the constitution, such as being at least 35 years old or a natural-born citizen of the United States) but is merely constitutionally ineligible to be elected President. Under this interpretation, a former two-term President would still be eligible, under the law, to obtain and hold the office of Vice President through election or appointment to that position.
"Again we bump into some problems of literalness, though, because some would argue that a person who has already run up against the limits of the 22nd Amendment isn’t “constitutionally ineligible” to be President (i.e., that person doesn’t fail to meet one or more of the requirements specified in Article II of the constitution, such as being at least 35 years old or a natural-born citizen of the United States) but is merely constitutionally ineligible to be elected President. Under this interpretation, a former two-term President would still be eligible, under the law, to obtain and hold the office of Vice President through election or appointment to that position.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36783
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: Election 2020
They call it the Cristina Fernandez maneuverChris_H_2 wrote:BarackBammer wrote:Michelle?Chris_H_2 wrote:Just read an article in the New Yorker and I agree with it. Biden should pick Obama as his running mate. Trump = guaranteed done.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35420
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Election 2020
I wish i shared Mcp's optimism and a I can't believe I just typed that.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: Election 2020
It has a tinge of Medvedev and Putin switching roles every x number of years (although now Putin's given up on that).E.H. Ruddock wrote:Here's a basic summary of stuff I've seen in the argument for:
"Again we bump into some problems of literalness, though, because some would argue that a person who has already run up against the limits of the 22nd Amendment isn’t “constitutionally ineligible” to be President (i.e., that person doesn’t fail to meet one or more of the requirements specified in Article II of the constitution, such as being at least 35 years old or a natural-born citizen of the United States) but is merely constitutionally ineligible to be elected President. Under this interpretation, a former two-term President would still be eligible, under the law, to obtain and hold the office of Vice President through election or appointment to that position.
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15608
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: Election 2020
That’s not what the constitution says Wease.wease wrote:Barack can’t be Veep. The constitution clearly states he can’t be President again and they can’t put him in the position that might make that possible.Chris_H_2 wrote:BarackBammer wrote:Michelle?Chris_H_2 wrote:Just read an article in the New Yorker and I agree with it. Biden should pick Obama as his running mate. Trump = guaranteed done.
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15608
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: Election 2020
It works. Because if you think otherwise, Obama would be technically ineligible for Speaker of the House (it’s just 1 line removed from VP). Succession is not the same as elected.doug rr wrote:chris h2?E.H. Ruddock wrote:Oh I know. I've just seen a lot of legal scholars argue that the way the language is, they feel there would be a case to making it work.
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29896
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: Election 2020
this is a popularity contest
unleash the Oprah
unleash the Oprah
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: Election 2020
This is a great point.McParadigm wrote:All this talk about finding an overshadowingly popular VP pick is just another manifestation of an electoral insecurity that is, frankly, embarrassing.
Donald Trump is 12 points underwater (with even worse favorability). His own polling shows him losing key swing states, and barely hanging on in other places that shouldn’t even be at risk.
The consistency and volume with which he would have to present a more inviting, less exhausting style of leadership between now and November in order to win is so far beyond him, not even his allies pretend to believe it. The Republican Party expects to lose the Senate.
If you’re the Democratic Party nominee, you don’t need more “popularity” at this point. You need more and more demonstrating that you’re not like the opposition. Clinging to figureheads or empowering celebrities is the worst choice you could make. Pick a capable political policy manager, because that’s what Joe Biden isn’t...and when you win the White House and Senate...you’re going to need a party-level leader who can do that.
So George Clooney then?
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40713
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Election 2020
I see you read the same Snopes article I did.E.H. Ruddock wrote:Here's a basic summary of stuff I've seen in the argument for:
"Again we bump into some problems of literalness, though, because some would argue that a person who has already run up against the limits of the 22nd Amendment isn’t “constitutionally ineligible” to be President (i.e., that person doesn’t fail to meet one or more of the requirements specified in Article II of the constitution, such as being at least 35 years old or a natural-born citizen of the United States) but is merely constitutionally ineligible to be elected President. Under this interpretation, a former two-term President would still be eligible, under the law, to obtain and hold the office of Vice President through election or appointment to that position.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40713
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: Election 2020
Depends on the interpretation. I’m all for Barack getting back into things. I just don’t think it would work the way we want it to.Chris_H_2 wrote:That’s not what the constitution says Wease.wease wrote:Barack can’t be Veep. The constitution clearly states he can’t be President again and they can’t put him in the position that might make that possible.Chris_H_2 wrote:BarackBammer wrote:Michelle?Chris_H_2 wrote:Just read an article in the New Yorker and I agree with it. Biden should pick Obama as his running mate. Trump = guaranteed done.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- Chris_H_2
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 15608
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
- Location: An office full of assholes
Re: Election 2020
Oh, I don’t think he’d ever accept it. But Biden’s said he’s a transitional president. And if he truly just wants to make sure that Trump doesn’t get elected, maybe he’d have no problem playing second fiddle. It would be sweet though.