Election 2020

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply

Vote Before You Can Vote!

Donald Trump (R)
59
44%
Joe Biden (D)
55
41%
Jacob Hornberger (L)
1
1%
Howie Hawkins (G)
1
1%
Other
1
1%
COVID-19
16
12%
 
Total votes: 133

User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51694
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Election 2020

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 2:40 am, edited 1 time in total.
doug rr
The Master
Posts: 27424
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos

Re: Election 2020

Post by doug rr »

he's sitting peacefully there....
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52035
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Election 2020

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

:(
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43451
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Election 2020

Post by VinylGuy »

wease wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
Superblood Wolfmoon wrote:Obama is going to the Supreme Court, not VP. The VP pick needs to be someone who can transition the party to the next generation.
OPRAH
Michelle/Oprah would win so yugely.
The democrats would never let Michelle Obama to be a candidate.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Election 2020

Post by McParadigm »

All this talk about finding an overshadowingly popular VP pick is just another manifestation of an electoral insecurity that is, frankly, embarrassing.

Donald Trump is 12 points underwater (with even worse favorability). His own polling shows him losing key swing states, and barely hanging on in other places that shouldn’t even be at risk.

The consistency and volume with which he would have to present a more inviting, less exhausting style of leadership between now and November in order to win is so far beyond him, not even his allies pretend to believe it. The Republican Party expects to lose the Senate.

If you’re the Democratic Party nominee, you don’t need more “popularity” at this point. You need more and more demonstrating that you’re not like the opposition. Clinging to figureheads or empowering celebrities is the worst choice you could make. Pick a capable political policy manager, because that’s what Joe Biden isn’t...and when you win the White House and Senate...you’re going to need a party-level leader who can do that.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52035
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Election 2020

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Superblood Wolfmoon wrote:
wease wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Bammer wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:Just read an article in the New Yorker and I agree with it. Biden should pick Obama as his running mate. Trump = guaranteed done.
Michelle?
Barack
Barack can’t be Veep. The constitution clearly states he can’t be President again and they can’t put him in the position that might make that possible.
I'm not so sure about that. Wouldn't it would just mean that if the president died/resigned/whatever, he'd be skipped over in the chain? He can't serve as president, but that doesn't disqualify him from serving as VP.
Yeah the language says you can't be elected president for a third term. It doesn't state you can't become it if you are vice president and something happens. Not sure how it would all hold up in court though.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40713
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Election 2020

Post by wease »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:
Superblood Wolfmoon wrote:
wease wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Bammer wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:Just read an article in the New Yorker and I agree with it. Biden should pick Obama as his running mate. Trump = guaranteed done.
Michelle?
Barack
Barack can’t be Veep. The constitution clearly states he can’t be President again and they can’t put him in the position that might make that possible.
I'm not so sure about that. Wouldn't it would just mean that if the president died/resigned/whatever, he'd be skipped over in the chain? He can't serve as president, but that doesn't disqualify him from serving as VP.
Yeah the language says you can't be elected president for a third term. It doesn't state you can't become it if you are vice president and something happens. Not sure how it would all hold up in court though.
It also says you can’t run for VP if you are constitutionally ineligible to be president. Obama is ineligible to be president again.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52035
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Election 2020

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Oh I know. I've just seen a lot of legal scholars argue that the way the language is, they feel there would be a case to making it work.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
doug rr
The Master
Posts: 27424
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos

Re: Election 2020

Post by doug rr »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Oh I know. I've just seen a lot of legal scholars argue that the way the language is, they feel there would be a case to making it work.
chris h2?
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 52035
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Election 2020

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Here's a basic summary of stuff I've seen in the argument for:

"Again we bump into some problems of literalness, though, because some would argue that a person who has already run up against the limits of the 22nd Amendment isn’t “constitutionally ineligible” to be President (i.e., that person doesn’t fail to meet one or more of the requirements specified in Article II of the constitution, such as being at least 35 years old or a natural-born citizen of the United States) but is merely constitutionally ineligible to be elected President. Under this interpretation, a former two-term President would still be eligible, under the law, to obtain and hold the office of Vice President through election or appointment to that position.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36783
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Election 2020

Post by Jorge »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
Bammer wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:Just read an article in the New Yorker and I agree with it. Biden should pick Obama as his running mate. Trump = guaranteed done.
Michelle?
Barack
They call it the Cristina Fernandez maneuver
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35420
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: Election 2020

Post by Strat »

I wish i shared Mcp's optimism and a I can't believe I just typed that.
simple schoolboy
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am

Re: Election 2020

Post by simple schoolboy »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Here's a basic summary of stuff I've seen in the argument for:

"Again we bump into some problems of literalness, though, because some would argue that a person who has already run up against the limits of the 22nd Amendment isn’t “constitutionally ineligible” to be President (i.e., that person doesn’t fail to meet one or more of the requirements specified in Article II of the constitution, such as being at least 35 years old or a natural-born citizen of the United States) but is merely constitutionally ineligible to be elected President. Under this interpretation, a former two-term President would still be eligible, under the law, to obtain and hold the office of Vice President through election or appointment to that position.
It has a tinge of Medvedev and Putin switching roles every x number of years (although now Putin's given up on that).
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15608
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: Election 2020

Post by Chris_H_2 »

wease wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Bammer wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:Just read an article in the New Yorker and I agree with it. Biden should pick Obama as his running mate. Trump = guaranteed done.
Michelle?
Barack
Barack can’t be Veep. The constitution clearly states he can’t be President again and they can’t put him in the position that might make that possible.
That’s not what the constitution says Wease.
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15608
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: Election 2020

Post by Chris_H_2 »

doug rr wrote:
E.H. Ruddock wrote:Oh I know. I've just seen a lot of legal scholars argue that the way the language is, they feel there would be a case to making it work.
chris h2?
It works. Because if you think otherwise, Obama would be technically ineligible for Speaker of the House (it’s just 1 line removed from VP). Succession is not the same as elected.
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29896
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Election 2020

Post by 96583UP »

this is a popularity contest

unleash the Oprah
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Election 2020

Post by elliseamos »

McParadigm wrote:All this talk about finding an overshadowingly popular VP pick is just another manifestation of an electoral insecurity that is, frankly, embarrassing.

Donald Trump is 12 points underwater (with even worse favorability). His own polling shows him losing key swing states, and barely hanging on in other places that shouldn’t even be at risk.

The consistency and volume with which he would have to present a more inviting, less exhausting style of leadership between now and November in order to win is so far beyond him, not even his allies pretend to believe it. The Republican Party expects to lose the Senate.

If you’re the Democratic Party nominee, you don’t need more “popularity” at this point. You need more and more demonstrating that you’re not like the opposition. Clinging to figureheads or empowering celebrities is the worst choice you could make. Pick a capable political policy manager, because that’s what Joe Biden isn’t...and when you win the White House and Senate...you’re going to need a party-level leader who can do that.
This is a great point.

So George Clooney then?
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40713
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Election 2020

Post by wease »

E.H. Ruddock wrote:Here's a basic summary of stuff I've seen in the argument for:

"Again we bump into some problems of literalness, though, because some would argue that a person who has already run up against the limits of the 22nd Amendment isn’t “constitutionally ineligible” to be President (i.e., that person doesn’t fail to meet one or more of the requirements specified in Article II of the constitution, such as being at least 35 years old or a natural-born citizen of the United States) but is merely constitutionally ineligible to be elected President. Under this interpretation, a former two-term President would still be eligible, under the law, to obtain and hold the office of Vice President through election or appointment to that position.
I see you read the same Snopes article I did.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40713
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: Election 2020

Post by wease »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
wease wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Bammer wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:Just read an article in the New Yorker and I agree with it. Biden should pick Obama as his running mate. Trump = guaranteed done.
Michelle?
Barack
Barack can’t be Veep. The constitution clearly states he can’t be President again and they can’t put him in the position that might make that possible.
That’s not what the constitution says Wease.
Depends on the interpretation. I’m all for Barack getting back into things. I just don’t think it would work the way we want it to.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15608
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: Election 2020

Post by Chris_H_2 »

Oh, I don’t think he’d ever accept it. But Biden’s said he’s a transitional president. And if he truly just wants to make sure that Trump doesn’t get elected, maybe he’d have no problem playing second fiddle. It would be sweet though.
Post Reply