
America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
-
doug rr
- The Master
- Posts: 27424
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
- Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos
- blueviper
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
It’ll be a mess. There’s a uneasy situation between attorney Gardner and the St. Louis city and police. She supposedly at the beginning of her term had a list of officers that if a case came up that involved any officer on this list, she wouldn’t see it. It’s been said she’s lax on looters/rioters and tough on police and “the right”simple schoolboy wrote:McCloskey update. I can't figure how the local prosecutor is going to take this to trial:
https://www.ksdk.com/amp/article/news/l ... ssion=true
Now it’s negligent for Ken and Karen to be pointing the weapons, but technically the protestors were on private property. But if others on the private property didn’t fear for their lives then it’s going to be a tough case for McCloskeys to defend.
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
The list of officers thing sounds like it could be an unreliable witness list. Most localities maintain such a list of officers known to have lied under oath. Prosecutors won't call them as a result and may drop cases that they are integral to. Maybe the list you refer to is different, but the scenario I described occurs pretty much everywhere.blueviper wrote:It’ll be a mess. There’s a uneasy situation between attorney Gardner and the St. Louis city and police. She supposedly at the beginning of her term had a list of officers that if a case came up that involved any officer on this list, she wouldn’t see it. It’s been said she’s lax on looters/rioters and tough on police and “the right”simple schoolboy wrote:McCloskey update. I can't figure how the local prosecutor is going to take this to trial:
https://www.ksdk.com/amp/article/news/l ... ssion=true
Now it’s negligent for Ken and Karen to be pointing the weapons, but technically the protestors were on private property. But if others on the private property didn’t fear for their lives then it’s going to be a tough case for McCloskeys to defend.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
In case you missed it, a pretty good use of Rammstein:
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
So thats why the NFAC had so many negligent discharges.
- blueviper
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4143
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
This makes sense.simple schoolboy wrote:The list of officers thing sounds like it could be an unreliable witness list. Most localities maintain such a list of officers known to have lied under oath. Prosecutors won't call them as a result and may drop cases that they are integral to. Maybe the list you refer to is different, but the scenario I described occurs pretty much everywhere.blueviper wrote:It’ll be a mess. There’s a uneasy situation between attorney Gardner and the St. Louis city and police. She supposedly at the beginning of her term had a list of officers that if a case came up that involved any officer on this list, she wouldn’t see it. It’s been said she’s lax on looters/rioters and tough on police and “the right”simple schoolboy wrote:McCloskey update. I can't figure how the local prosecutor is going to take this to trial:
https://www.ksdk.com/amp/article/news/l ... ssion=true
Now it’s negligent for Ken and Karen to be pointing the weapons, but technically the protestors were on private property. But if others on the private property didn’t fear for their lives then it’s going to be a tough case for McCloskeys to defend.
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
It only makes sense due to the existence of police unions. Testifying in court seems like an important police duty. If they can't do that, why are they still employed?blueviper wrote:This makes sense.simple schoolboy wrote:The list of officers thing sounds like it could be an unreliable witness list. Most localities maintain such a list of officers known to have lied under oath. Prosecutors won't call them as a result and may drop cases that they are integral to. Maybe the list you refer to is different, but the scenario I described occurs pretty much everywhere.blueviper wrote:It’ll be a mess. There’s a uneasy situation between attorney Gardner and the St. Louis city and police. She supposedly at the beginning of her term had a list of officers that if a case came up that involved any officer on this list, she wouldn’t see it. It’s been said she’s lax on looters/rioters and tough on police and “the right”simple schoolboy wrote:McCloskey update. I can't figure how the local prosecutor is going to take this to trial:
https://www.ksdk.com/amp/article/news/l ... ssion=true
Now it’s negligent for Ken and Karen to be pointing the weapons, but technically the protestors were on private property. But if others on the private property didn’t fear for their lives then it’s going to be a tough case for McCloskeys to defend.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
I'm seeing 9mm thats 2-3 times the cost of the before times.
I'm also hearing folx doing mag dumps into (the hillside? the air?) on a nightly basis. Is this where the extra $600 in UI has been going?
Apparently all these new gun buyers settled on 9mm, 5.56mm, or 12 gauge. Stick with fudd calibers and things are mostly normal.
I'm also hearing folx doing mag dumps into (the hillside? the air?) on a nightly basis. Is this where the extra $600 in UI has been going?
Apparently all these new gun buyers settled on 9mm, 5.56mm, or 12 gauge. Stick with fudd calibers and things are mostly normal.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
California has banned 'firearm precursors' , and that definition is rather vague so aluminium billet of a certain size, or steel tube with a particular OD could be affected.
In other news, brass cased 5.56 is going for $0.60/ rd FMJ, and 7.62x51 is going for $1/rd for FMJ.
Damn you new gun owners, shit was chill for a while 2017-2019.
In other news, brass cased 5.56 is going for $0.60/ rd FMJ, and 7.62x51 is going for $1/rd for FMJ.
Damn you new gun owners, shit was chill for a while 2017-2019.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
I don't know if these desk popping folks are aware, but someone just popped of at least $6 worth of ammo at current prices. The joke is on them when they try to re-up.simple schoolboy wrote:I'm seeing 9mm thats 2-3 times the cost of the before times.
I'm also hearing folx doing mag dumps into (the hillside? the air?) on a nightly basis. Is this where the extra $600 in UI has been going?
Apparently all these new gun buyers settled on 9mm, 5.56mm, or 12 gauge. Stick with fudd calibers and things are mostly normal.
*Edit* This post brought to you by pure cope
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
9th circuit panel has ruled that high capacity magazine bans are unconstitutional. It will be reheard en banc, and is expected to be upheld. Sounds like California is getting a freedom week 2.0
-
Electromatic
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
How can a magazine be unconstitutional?simple schoolboy wrote:9th circuit panel has ruled that high capacity magazine bans are unconstitutional. It will be reheard en banc, and is expected to be upheld. Sounds like California is getting a freedom week 2.0
If you want to amend the constitution or write a law stating that they are illegal cool. A part of a gun that holds rounds is not unconstitutional. Otherwise a trunk or a shopping cart might as well be unconstitutional.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
A ban on high capacity magazines is unconstitutional. Sorry if my terrible writing style obscured that.Electromatic wrote:How can a magazine be unconstitutional?simple schoolboy wrote:9th circuit panel has ruled that high capacity magazine bans are unconstitutional. It will be reheard en banc, and is expected to be upheld. Sounds like California is getting a freedom week 2.0
If you want to amend the constitution or write a law stating that they are illegal cool. A part of a gun that holds rounds is not unconstitutional. Otherwise a trunk or a shopping cart might as well be unconstitutional.
-
Electromatic
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3679
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
simple schoolboy wrote:A ban on high capacity magazines is unconstitutional. Sorry if my terrible writing style obscured that.Electromatic wrote:How can a magazine be unconstitutional?simple schoolboy wrote:9th circuit panel has ruled that high capacity magazine bans are unconstitutional. It will be reheard en banc, and is expected to be upheld. Sounds like California is getting a freedom week 2.0
If you want to amend the constitution or write a law stating that they are illegal cool. A part of a gun that holds rounds is not unconstitutional. Otherwise a trunk or a shopping cart might as well be unconstitutional.
Oh I’m sorry, I was reading on my phone. I probably misread what you wrote.
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22817
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
What’s up guys a 5 year old got shot by his 25 year old neighbor.
Guns.
Cannon Hinnant
Guns.
Cannon Hinnant
(she/him/theirs)
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
Not the preffered arrative-nay.Bammer wrote:What’s up guys a 5 year old got shot by his 25 year old neighbor.
Guns.
Cannon Hinnant
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
Also, probably only doable because of Trump appointed judge. I was suprised to read that its expected to be upheld en banc, cuz it is the 9th after all.simple schoolboy wrote:9th circuit panel has ruled that high capacity magazine bans are unconstitutional. It will be reheard en banc, and is expected to be upheld. Sounds like California is getting a freedom week 2.0
With Roberts being very hesitant to hear 2A cases, it sounds like we might get some unresolved conflicts between circuit decisions for some time.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
The dems want to ban the importation of foreign made AR-15s. Its as if they can't be arsed to do basic research on existing laws and market conditions.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
3-D printed and electro-machined firearms continue apace.
- Stickman
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10402
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
- Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman