PJ Political Hits and Misses...

General Pearl Jam discussion.
User avatar
darthvedder81
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 349
Joined: Tue July 09, 2013 2:13 am
Location: Twin Cities

Re: PJ Political Hits and Misses...

Post by darthvedder81 »

Hit: Grievance. "For every tool they lend us/loss of independence" "Champagne breakfast for everyone". It's PJ at their most Libertarian and thus closest to my own political philosophy. Whether that was Ed's intent or not that's my interpretation of it anyway. He wrote it in response to the WTO situation so it's seems more of an attack on crony capitalism than anything.

Miss: Bushleaguer. I have my doubts about all wars (not just the ones Democrats don't like—which in the last 100 years is actually very few). The problem here wasn't Ed going after the administration so much as the ham-fisted way he did it that sounded utterly dated even before W's presidency was over. It's always a danger to be too specific in a political/protest song. The best artists know how to speak more to the underlying issues and ideas so that even when I don't always agree I can still respect the thinking.
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: PJ Political Hits and Misses...

Post by Bammer »

You guys think PJ has made a mistake with their “get out and vote” push, considering the fan base is middle age white dudes? Let’s be honest, that’s a lot of R votes.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: PJ Political Hits and Misses...

Post by B »

Everyone should have the right to cast their vote, Bammer. Take your sorry, vote-suppressing ass back to Russia.

Image
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
Let's all laugh at Rangers
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 375
Joined: Thu January 31, 2013 7:26 pm

Re: PJ Political Hits and Misses...

Post by Let's all laugh at Rangers »

darthvedder81 wrote:Hit: Grievance. "For every tool they lend us/loss of independence" "Champagne breakfast for everyone". It's PJ at their most Libertarian and thus closest to my own political philosophy. Whether that was Ed's intent or not that's my interpretation of it anyway. He wrote it in response to the WTO situation so it's seems more of an attack on crony capitalism than anything.

Miss: Bushleaguer. I have my doubts about all wars (not just the ones Democrats don't like—which in the last 100 years is actually very few). The problem here wasn't Ed going after the administration so much as the ham-fisted way he did it that sounded utterly dated even before W's presidency was over. It's always a danger to be too specific in a political/protest song. The best artists know how to speak more to the underlying issues and ideas so that even when I don't always agree I can still respect the thinking.
For every tool they lend us was almost prophetic. I mean, think of internet shopping leading to shops closing down, youtube suddenly going to adverts, DVD's deciding which bits you can and can't fast forward.

I know what you mean about Bu$hleaguer. Perhaps "he's not a leader, he's a UKIP leaguer" would be more topical...
So basically, Johnson and May spent Trump's presidency fighting each other over how best to sell the NHS to Trump.
guitar_davey
AnalLog
Posts: 1869
Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 6:09 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: PJ Political Hits and Misses...

Post by guitar_davey »

I'll cast my vote for Grievance. WMA is up there as well. I'm also a fan of Unemployable. I thought WWS was fine at the time for what it is.

I also like Bu$hleaguer. I enjoy how it bent a lot of Bush fans out of shape.

No More is probably the worst, although whatever -- I can't argue with the sentiment. EV was clearly going for a 60s protest song vibe -- I think it's just jarring to hear something like that coming from Pearl Jam.
User avatar
RockPusher
Future Drummer
Posts: 2075
Joined: Mon March 30, 2020 11:59 pm
Location: This godforsaken town

Re: PJ Political Hits and Misses...

Post by RockPusher »

Bammer wrote:You guys think PJ has made a mistake with their “get out and vote” push, considering the fan base is middle age white dudes? Let’s be honest, that’s a lot of R votes.
Pearl Jam supports democracy. They know that society is best served by the most people voting possible. I agree with that, and see it as a non-partisan stance.
Be mighty...Be humble...Be mighty humble...
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28035
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: PJ Political Hits and Misses...

Post by Monkey_Driven »

RockPusher wrote:
Bammer wrote:You guys think PJ has made a mistake with their “get out and vote” push, considering the fan base is middle age white dudes? Let’s be honest, that’s a lot of R votes.
Pearl Jam supports democracy. They know that society is best served by the most people voting possible. I agree with that, and see it as a non-partisan stance.
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: PJ Political Hits and Misses...

Post by Bammer »

guitar_davey wrote:I'll cast my vote for Grievance. WMA is up there as well. I'm also a fan of Unemployable. I thought WWS was fine at the time for what it is.

I also like Bu$hleaguer. I enjoy how it bent a lot of Bush fans out of shape.

No More is probably the worst, although whatever -- I can't argue with the sentiment. EV was clearly going for a 60s protest song vibe -- I think it's just jarring to hear something like that coming from Pearl Jam.
I always assumed No More was a cover
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: PJ Political Hits and Misses...

Post by Bammer »

Monkey_Driven wrote:
RockPusher wrote:
Bammer wrote:You guys think PJ has made a mistake with their “get out and vote” push, considering the fan base is middle age white dudes? Let’s be honest, that’s a lot of R votes.
Pearl Jam supports democracy. They know that society is best served by the most people voting possible. I agree with that, and see it as a non-partisan stance.
Please stop taking my posts seriously
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
RockPusher
Future Drummer
Posts: 2075
Joined: Mon March 30, 2020 11:59 pm
Location: This godforsaken town

Re: PJ Political Hits and Misses...

Post by RockPusher »

Bammer wrote:
Monkey_Driven wrote:
RockPusher wrote:
Bammer wrote:You guys think PJ has made a mistake with their “get out and vote” push, considering the fan base is middle age white dudes? Let’s be honest, that’s a lot of R votes.
Pearl Jam supports democracy. They know that society is best served by the most people voting possible. I agree with that, and see it as a non-partisan stance.
Please stop taking my posts seriously
Shouldn't it be "Growing dick, fixing and *firing* things"?
;)
Be mighty...Be humble...Be mighty humble...
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: PJ Political Hits and Misses...

Post by B »

Bammer wrote:Please stop taking my posts seriously
Image
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
guitar_davey
AnalLog
Posts: 1869
Joined: Mon July 15, 2013 6:09 pm
Location: Ottawa, Canada

Re: PJ Political Hits and Misses...

Post by guitar_davey »

Bammer wrote:
guitar_davey wrote:I'll cast my vote for Grievance. WMA is up there as well. I'm also a fan of Unemployable. I thought WWS was fine at the time for what it is.

I also like Bu$hleaguer. I enjoy how it bent a lot of Bush fans out of shape.

No More is probably the worst, although whatever -- I can't argue with the sentiment. EV was clearly going for a 60s protest song vibe -- I think it's just jarring to hear something like that coming from Pearl Jam.
I always assumed No More was a cover
I wouldn't be surprised if it's extremely similar to an existing song.
Post Reply