Books, movies, television...
Stickman
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10263 Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Post
by Stickman » Thu January 24, 2013 7:16 am
A series of interconnected short films follows three kids as they search the depths of the Internet to find the most banned movie in the world.
VIDEO
That Halle Berry bit gets me every time.
"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42761 Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm
Post
by VinylGuy » Thu January 24, 2013 2:37 pm
Stickman wrote:
A series of interconnected short films follows three kids as they search the depths of the Internet to find the most banned movie in the world.
VIDEO
That Halle Berry bit gets me every time.
seems really fun.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36487 Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires
Post
by Jorge » Thu January 24, 2013 2:55 pm
I'll watch it, but that trailer isn't very promising. I wonder why it's been languishing unreleased for three years.
Anders wrote: I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
AndySlash
Future Drummer
Posts: 2568 Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:42 am
Location: Minneapolis
Post
by AndySlash » Thu January 24, 2013 7:01 pm
theplatypus wrote: I'll watch it, but that trailer isn't very promising. I wonder why it's been languishing unreleased for three years.
http://insidemovies.ew.com/2012/10/01/m ... e-winslet/
Farrelly: “It’s the brainchild of Charlie Wessler, who produced most of our movies. Never before have such huge actors pushed the envelope so much,” said Farrelly by phone. “Charlie knows all these people. He went to them, huge stars, like Kate Winslet, and she said, ‘I’m shooting this movie, I’m not free for a year and a half.’ This movie was made over four years, and they just had to wait for a year or two years for different actors. They would shoot for a week, and shut down for several months. Same thing with the directors. It was the type of movie you could come back to.”
i buy the story. but it is still coming out in movie season garbage time, so my expectations aren't high. but i do want to see it.
ah, copperplate, a font for the truly modern man.
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846 Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:
Post
by epilogue » Thu January 24, 2013 9:12 pm
theplatypus wrote: I'll watch it, but that trailer isn't very promising.
Yep.
clavian
A Return To Form
Posts: 104 Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:20 pm
Post
by clavian » Thu January 24, 2013 10:44 pm
I read somewhere that Halle Berry dips one of her naked boobs in guacamole in this movie, so that might be worth seeing.
Now, what would Oscar Winner® Michael Caine do?
-Cpt. Murphy
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787 Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Post
by E.H. Ruddock » Sat January 26, 2013 8:46 pm
This movie was a big steaming pile of shit.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Stickman
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10263 Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:41 am
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Post
by Stickman » Sun January 27, 2013 5:38 pm
It's that bad?
"I'll hold your wallet while you go fuck yourself"-David Letterman
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846 Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:
Post
by epilogue » Sun January 27, 2013 7:34 pm
Richard Roeper's review:
http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbc ... /130129973
"As the ads for "Movie 43" promised (threatened?), you can't un-see this thing, so please: Stay away. Even if you might think that sitting through "Movie 43" would be an adventure along the lines of experiencing "Showgirls" or "Howard the Duck," you'll be filled with regret five minutes into this atrocity. There's camp-fun bad and interestingly horrible bad, and then there's just awful.
"Movie 43" is the "Citizen Kane" of awful."
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36487 Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires
Post
by Jorge » Sun January 27, 2013 9:01 pm
theplatypus wrote: I'll watch it
Anders wrote: I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516 Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Post
by Mecca » Sun January 27, 2013 9:06 pm
Odd, I remember the trailer making me really want to see this movie.
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787 Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Post
by E.H. Ruddock » Sun January 27, 2013 11:38 pm
Really, really bad. Like Season of the Witch bad.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Mecca
slower than 82% of US
Posts: 8516 Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 7:17 pm
Post
by Mecca » Mon May 30, 2016 9:13 pm
this was bad
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787 Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Post
by E.H. Ruddock » Tue May 31, 2016 2:13 am
So bad
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846 Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:
Post
by epilogue » Tue May 31, 2016 4:17 pm
HOW BAD WAS IT
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787 Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Post
by E.H. Ruddock » Tue May 31, 2016 4:29 pm
durdencommatyler wrote: HOW BAD WAS IT
Almost as bad as "We Are Your Friends", but not quite.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
LoathedVermin72
The Master
Posts: 33834 Joined: Sun May 25, 2014 9:32 pm
Post
by LoathedVermin72 » Tue May 31, 2016 4:29 pm
E.H. Ruddock wrote: durdencommatyler wrote: HOW BAD WAS IT
Almost as bad as "We Are Your Friends", but not quite.
i refuse to accept that we are your friends is worse than movie 43
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84846 Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:
Post
by epilogue » Tue May 31, 2016 4:30 pm
LoathedVermin72 wrote: E.H. Ruddock wrote: durdencommatyler wrote: HOW BAD WAS IT
Almost as bad as "We Are Your Friends", but not quite.
i refuse to accept that we are your friends is worse than movie 43
Nah, I believe it. Ruddo's usually not wrong about this stuff.
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787 Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Post
by E.H. Ruddock » Tue May 31, 2016 4:32 pm
LoathedVermin72 wrote: E.H. Ruddock wrote: durdencommatyler wrote: HOW BAD WAS IT
Almost as bad as "We Are Your Friends", but not quite.
i refuse to accept that we are your friends is worse than movie 43
Have you watched WAYF yet?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG