The Supreme Court
-
digster
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am
Re: The Supreme Court
I also can't imagine there's many examples of this, where the judicial system and populace of a country as a whole are moving in different directions. The country's moving increasingly in liberal directions, particularly on social issues, while the courts are drifting further to the right. In the long-term, the courts will change because they'll have to, should that split continue to widen, but in the short and medium-term this place'll be really ugly.
-
digster
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am
Re: The Supreme Court
I think all Democrats need to do to add justices to the Supreme Court is overturn the judicial filibuster, than they can add seats. Which I actually would have betted that Joe Biden would not want to do; I'm not sure he's going to have a choice, now.Strat wrote:So best case scenario is trump stacks the supreme court (with the potential for having enough votes to overturn roe v wade) but trump loses the election and the dems stack the lower courts?McParadigm wrote:Noah Rothmans? Oh yeah. There’s enough.Strat wrote:I can't imagine there is enough of those types?McParadigm wrote:There is a breed of conservative that badly wants a conservative court, but dislikes or is low on support for Trumpism. A potential nomination is leverage for getting their vote. A completed nomination is over with and done, so they don’t need him.Strat wrote:I need someone to dumb this down for me. I dont see it this way. I see it only as red meat for conservatives to show up big for trump and continue stacking the court.digster wrote:This is absolutely true; turning the election into a choice on who gets to fill the seat as opposed to a referendum on him is the best chance he's been given to turn the election in his favor. I can't imagine he'll take it; the potential for lib ownage is far too high.McParadigm wrote:Honestly the worst move Trump could make would be to fill the seat before November. Doing so motivates the Democratic base even further to get out the vote, decreases the need for conservatives to hang onto him (what with having gotten their conservative court and all), and will absolutely blow up moderate Dem support for expanding the court.
Waiting until after the election is his safest option. So I assume he’ll nominate someone tomorrow.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: The Supreme Court
It don’t feel right to me to call any remaining scenario a “bet case” at this point.Strat wrote:So best case scenario is trump stacks the courts (with the potential for having enough votes to overturn roe v wade) but trump loses the election and the dems stack the lower courts?McParadigm wrote:Noah Rothmans? Oh yeah. There’s enough.Strat wrote:I can't imagine there is enough of those types?McParadigm wrote:There is a breed of conservative that badly wants a conservative court, but dislikes or is low on support for Trumpism. A potential nomination is leverage for getting their vote. A completed nomination is over with and done, so they don’t need him.Strat wrote:I need someone to dumb this down for me. I dont see it this way. I see it only as red meat for conservatives to show up big for trump and continue stacking the court.digster wrote:This is absolutely true; turning the election into a choice on who gets to fill the seat as opposed to a referendum on him is the best chance he's been given to turn the election in his favor. I can't imagine he'll take it; the potential for lib ownage is far too high.McParadigm wrote:Honestly the worst move Trump could make would be to fill the seat before November. Doing so motivates the Democratic base even further to get out the vote, decreases the need for conservatives to hang onto him (what with having gotten their conservative court and all), and will absolutely blow up moderate Dem support for expanding the court.
Waiting until after the election is his safest option. So I assume he’ll nominate someone tomorrow.
(patriotic choking noises)
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35418
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: The Supreme Court
love notwithstanding we are each of us fucked
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: The Supreme Court
Anyone see trump's reaction after the press told him? I can't believe he handled it as gracefully as he did.
Dick/Balls
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29884
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: The Supreme Court
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: The Supreme Court
Quoting a high school drop outs dumb lyric is not what we need right nowStrat wrote:love notwithstanding we are each of us fucked
Dick/Balls
-
digster
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am
Re: The Supreme Court
I honestly wouldn't be that surprised if four Republicans come out like this. Murkowski, Collins, Romney are three, and Lamar Alexander has said there shouldn't be a vote in 2020, and he's retiring this year and doesn't have to worry about re-election.
Last edited by digster on Sat September 19, 2020 1:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35418
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: The Supreme Court
my god you are the worst.verb_to_trust wrote:Quoting a high school drop outs dumb lyric is not what we need right nowStrat wrote:love notwithstanding we are each of us fucked
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29884
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: The Supreme Court
Collins loves to front like she won't do what the GOP wants and then always does it
she is just putting out the bat-signal for a payoff
then will guzzle the c*m like always
she is just putting out the bat-signal for a payoff
then will guzzle the c*m like always
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
-
digster
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am
Re: The Supreme Court
I don't know; in Maine, she might need moderates more than MAGA-ites.
-
digster
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am
Re: The Supreme Court
Or not.digster wrote: I honestly wouldn't be that surprised if four Republicans come out like this. Murkowski, Collins, Romney are three, and Lamar Alexander has said there shouldn't be a vote in 2020, and he's retiring this year and doesn't have to worry about re-election.
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: The Supreme Court
Who the fuck is Liz Johnson? The worst thing about Twitter is people like this thinking they get to talk.
Dick/Balls
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: The Supreme Court
In state she tries real hard to promote her centrist votes of bygone years.96583UP wrote:Collins loves to front like she won't do what the GOP wants and then always does it
she is just putting out the bat-signal for a payoff
then will guzzle the c*m like always
It would seem pretty hard in my mind for her to have the egg of Kavanaugh still on her face and double down in support of another Trump nominee.
-
digster
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am
Re: The Supreme Court
Romney's communications director.verb_to_trust wrote:Who the fuck is Liz Johnson? The worst thing about Twitter is people like this thinking they get to talk.
- elliseamos
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8900
- Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
- Location: SOUTH PORTLAND
Re: The Supreme Court
This is what I was getting at.digster wrote:I don't know; in Maine, she might need moderates more than MAGA-ites.
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: The Supreme Court
Yeah I get that. But we don't need to hear this person talk.digster wrote:Romney's communications director.verb_to_trust wrote:Who the fuck is Liz Johnson? The worst thing about Twitter is people like this thinking they get to talk.
Dick/Balls
- Simple Torture
- I Have A Third Nipple
- Posts: 21689
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
- Location: Cumberland, RI
Re: The Supreme Court
Her job is literally to talk and clarify a Senator's opinions and positions.verb_to_trust wrote:Yeah I get that. But we don't need to hear this person talk.digster wrote:Romney's communications director.verb_to_trust wrote:Who the fuck is Liz Johnson? The worst thing about Twitter is people like this thinking they get to talk.
McParadigm wrote:lol
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36758
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: The Supreme Court
Simple Torture wrote:Her job is literally to talk and clarify a Senator's opinions and positions.verb_to_trust wrote:Yeah I get that. But we don't need to hear this person talk.digster wrote:Romney's communications director.verb_to_trust wrote:Who the fuck is Liz Johnson? The worst thing about Twitter is people like this thinking they get to talk.
EDIT: I was laughing at the first version of this post which was much funnier. What the hell, ST
Last edited by Jorge on Sat September 19, 2020 2:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35418
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: The Supreme Court
verb gonna verbJorge wrote:Simple Torture wrote:Her job is literally to talk and clarify a Senator's opinions and positions.verb_to_trust wrote:Yeah I get that. But we don't need to hear this person talk.digster wrote:Romney's communications director.verb_to_trust wrote:Who the fuck is Liz Johnson? The worst thing about Twitter is people like this thinking they get to talk.
