
The Supreme Court
-
doug rr
- The Master
- Posts: 27424
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
- Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25049
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
My Facebook thread is full of 2016/2020 quotes from McConnell, Cruz, Graham, and who the fuck ever else.
People know that the Republicans didn't think you should replace a Justice in an election year, and they all changed their minds mightily this week.
If anyone gave a shit about their Senators having a point of view, we wouldn't be in the situation we're in. We have a racist, rapist criminal President elected by super-Jesus Christians. Don't try to convince Facebook friends to have a brain.
People know that the Republicans didn't think you should replace a Justice in an election year, and they all changed their minds mightily this week.
If anyone gave a shit about their Senators having a point of view, we wouldn't be in the situation we're in. We have a racist, rapist criminal President elected by super-Jesus Christians. Don't try to convince Facebook friends to have a brain.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: The Supreme Court
I try to be pragmatic. There’s still a lot that could go wrong...Democrats could stumble into a religion/court fight over a nominee, for one thing. But I’m more concerned with things like voting access and pre-emptive election night victory claims than I am any potential polling change, seeing as the polling hasn’t changed since March. And on the subject of supreme court fight impacts on a high stakes, high engagement election, we have fresh, direct precedence we can point to. That precedence tells us it doesn’t change much.Strat wrote:WHY ARE YOU SO HOPEFULMcParadigm wrote:This seems accurate to their way of thinking.B wrote:I feel like Republicans are going scorched Earth here. They're chances in November weren't great. If they wait and lose, they get no Justice. If they surge forward, it might make them unpopular, and they may lose in November, but at least they get a Justice.
If they fail at getting a Justice AND lose in November, we'll they'll still only be down 2 or 3 seats worse than they would have been had they done nothing.
This does not. Remember when the Kavanaugh fight was going to be a game changer that destroyed Democratic leads in 2018, but actually wasn’t at all?Maybe pushing forward excites the base and they win in November, then they get a Justice, a President, and the Senate.
The thing is, an uninspired base is the only problem they DONT have right now. Their problem is that the current numbers are the result of a fired up base and a small spattering of moderate remainers. Reacquiring some moderates (especially in the burbs) is their only hope...and moderates aren’t moved much either way by Supreme Court fights.
(patriotic choking noises)
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46239
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35418
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: The Supreme Court
She’s excellent. She’s Hispanic. She’s a terrific woman from everything I know. I don’t know her. Florida. We love Florida. So she’s got a lot of things — very smart,” Trump said in a call-in interview with “Fox and Friends.”
Asked whether politics would play a role in the decision, Trump responded: “I try not to say so. I think probably automatically it is. Even if you’re not wanting to do that it becomes a little automatic.”
I fucking hate him so much.
Asked whether politics would play a role in the decision, Trump responded: “I try not to say so. I think probably automatically it is. Even if you’re not wanting to do that it becomes a little automatic.”
I fucking hate him so much.
-
doug rr
- The Master
- Posts: 27424
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:45 pm
- Location: I'm now Canadian..go broncos
Re: The Supreme Court
this combined with trump combined with the election and combined with pete changing to norris is too overwhelming for me...
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29884
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: The Supreme Court
Signs pointing to #296583UP wrote:Pick One:
1) this is their chance to energize the base by appointing Ted Nugent
2) this is their chance to win back the suburbs by appointing some suburban white bitch
3) this is their chance to suppress the black vote by appointing Richard Spencer
4) this is their chance to seal the deal on a new Apprentice by appointing Ivanka Trump
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25049
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
Mitch citing precedent for quickly filling a seat in an election year. 
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40673
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The Supreme Court
I really do wish he’d do something so fuck-you as appointing Ivanka.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- Biff Pocoroba
- TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
- Posts: 4801
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm
- Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740
Re: The Supreme Court
I would love to see a GOP Senator reply "Yeah, so?"
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29884
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: The Supreme Court
i would like to see him nominate michael cohen
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46239
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
- wease
- Major Dude
- Posts: 40673
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
- Location: Where everybody knows your name
Re: The Supreme Court
Exactly. Mitch would love to rub it in the Dems’ faces.Biff Pocoroba wrote:I would love to see a GOP Senator reply "Yeah, so?"
There are no real requirements to be a SCJ, so it’s actually pretty easy to see Trump do something like that.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
- C. Montgomery Burns
- 96583UP
- The Master
- Posts: 29884
- Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am
Re: The Supreme Court
- Spoiler: show
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25049
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
There's a good 2 minutes of various Republican Senators arguing against nominating a Justice in an election year starting at the 10 minute mark.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- Hatfield
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 8:54 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
I almost broke my TV last night watching him cite precedent for why Democrats should calm down.B wrote:Mitch citing precedent for quickly filling a seat in an election year.
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois
Re: The Supreme Court
The GOP has made the SCOTUS into a joke. Why would anyone respect it at this point? When this country burns will conservatives on SCOTUS matter?
Dick/Balls
- tragabigzanda
- Production Police
- Posts: 51690
- Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm
Re: The Supreme Court
FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 3:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
- B
- Troglodyte
- Posts: 25049
- Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
- Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
- Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Re: The Supreme Court
Erin Burnett is great in this clip. She plays Sen. Barrasso's rant from 2016 and when it stops she just looks at the camera and says, "Things have changed?"
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/202 ... ot-vpx.cnn
https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/202 ... ot-vpx.cnn
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
- verb_to_trust
- Gone
- Posts: 24014
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
- Location: Illinois

