The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
simple schoolboy
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by simple schoolboy »

B wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:B, why are you perpetuating the patriarchy? Shouldn't you divorce your wife and abandon your children for justice?
My life, my business, schoolboy. Keep your laws off my body.
The Patriarchy is primarily instituted and enforced through legal means? The structure of families is not more significant?

Patriarchy is good and normal for PMC (the good kind of Patriarchy), but family formation is a terrible ill for those of less means or non cis-het couples/ polycules/etc.

What laws do you think I wish to invoke against your body? And how dare you priviledge your body over black and brown BIPOC bodies!?
User avatar
PHATJ
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15145
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:02 am
Twitter: Tweet this *points to your cans*
Location: Gigatown

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by PHATJ »

simple schoolboy wrote:
B wrote:
simple schoolboy wrote:B, why are you perpetuating the patriarchy? Shouldn't you divorce your wife and abandon your children for justice?
My life, my business, schoolboy. Keep your laws off my body.
The Patriarchy is primarily instituted and enforced through legal means? The structure of families is not more significant?

Patriarchy is good and normal for PMC (the good kind of Patriarchy), but family formation is a terrible ill for those of less means or non cis-het couples/ polycules/etc.

What laws do you think I wish to invoke against your body? And how dare you priviledge your body over black and brown BIPOC bodies!?
Hypocrites will hypocrite
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4143
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by blueviper »

BurtReynolds wrote:what
Just goes to show that both sides of the political spectrum are idiots.
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

time would be much better spent registering sympathetic voters in swing states rather than throwing selfish tantrums
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25047
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

blueviper wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:what
Just goes to show that both sides of the political spectrum are idiots.
Liberals are going to make her religion an issue, guys.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by verb_to_trust »

B wrote:
blueviper wrote:
BurtReynolds wrote:what
Just goes to show that both sides of the political spectrum are idiots.
Liberals are going to make her religion an issue, guys.
Religion is basically intertwined with SCOTUS even though it absolutely should not be. How could it not end up being an issue?
Dick/Balls
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25047
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Amy Coney Barrett wrote:Your legal career is but a means to an end, and as Father Jenkins told you this morning, that end is building the kingdom of God.


Who's going to make this about religion?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
surfndestroy
Future Drummer
Posts: 2870
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:21 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by surfndestroy »

B wrote:
Amy Coney Barrett wrote:Your legal career is but a means to an end, and as Father Jenkins told you this morning, that end is building the kingdom of God.


Who's going to make this about religion?
Anti-abortion stances are conflated with religion all the time.

Is there anything in ACB's court rulings that should rule her out from being a Supreme Court judge? If not, then as long as Repubs can get her through the process prior to the election date then good for them. I think we need to stop vilifying people/parties for playing by the rules. Vilify the rules, and those who uphold them when they had/have a chance to change them.
Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25047
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Yeah, unless she raped someone, we can't win this fight.
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Hatfield
AnalLog
Posts: 1517
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 8:54 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Hatfield »

B wrote:
Amy Coney Barrett wrote:Your legal career is but a means to an end, and as Father Jenkins told you this morning, that end is building the kingdom of God.


Who's going to make this about religion?
Woah! That is some Mike Pompeo level thinking.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by elliseamos »

surfndestroy wrote:
B wrote:
Amy Coney Barrett wrote:Your legal career is but a means to an end, and as Father Jenkins told you this morning, that end is building the kingdom of God.


Who's going to make this about religion?
Anti-abortion stances are conflated with religion all the time.

Is there anything in ACB's court rulings that should rule her out from being a Supreme Court judge? If not, then as long as Repubs can get her through the process prior to the election date then good for them. I think we need to stop vilifying people/parties for playing by the rules. Vilify the rules, and those who uphold them when they had/have a chance to change them.
what do the rules say about Merrick Garland again? I haven't read them in a while...
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by verb_to_trust »

Having 7 kids should seriously disqualify her. Think of the carbon emissions her kids will release over the course of their lifetimes.
Dick/Balls
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35418
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Strat »

Religion should maybe be aborted.
User avatar
surfndestroy
Future Drummer
Posts: 2870
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:21 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by surfndestroy »

Strat wrote:Religion should maybe be aborted.
Does this include indigenous people and culture which are tied very close to their spirit belief system?
Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35418
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Strat »

surfndestroy wrote:
Strat wrote:Religion should maybe be aborted.
Does this include indigenous people and culture which are tied very close to their spirit belief system?
Yea sure why not
User avatar
verb_to_trust
Gone
Posts: 24014
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 10:53 pm
Location: Illinois

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by verb_to_trust »

Strat wrote:
surfndestroy wrote:
Strat wrote:Religion should maybe be aborted.
Does this include indigenous people and culture which are tied very close to their spirit belief system?
Yea sure why not
I'm sorry strat but you've been cancelled
Dick/Balls
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

i don't even care that this woman is pro-life

she is fucking batshit crazy

it's not that she's religious

it's that she's an extremist

who the fuck takes orders from a 'head'?

that's a fundamentalist theocratic construct

not in my country

we don't want no ayatollahs here

if you like biblical times so much move to the middle east

b1tch
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

and shocker that her husband is her 'head'

and that they have so many children

hmmmmm I wonder what this power of praise club could all really be about hmmmmmmm

oh yeah

pervert weirdos who want to get laid

and have no game

so they have to create a shitty cult to force chicks to do them
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
blueviper
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4143
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:03 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by blueviper »

I guess People of Praise isn’t that influential in South Bend if they had a gay mayor for 8 years.
St. Louis (1998, 2000, 2003, 2004, 2010, 2022)
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29881
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 96583UP »

with a name like South Bend they better have a gay mayor

even the theocrats insist
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
Post Reply