Fantasy Football Discussion

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85156
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

I feel like I'd lean Mostert, assuming he plays. I'm sure he'll split time with McKinnon but even still. Against Miami, I don't think he needs a ton of touches to do some real damage. I guess it depends on whether you need a ceiling play or a floor play at the RB position.

What did Jefferson do last week? Anderson has been pretty consistent.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48511
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

i'm thinking the same on mostert...he is a morning or game time decision, so i'm going to leave mixon in for now...i'm not big on him anyway this week vs the ravens so i'm kinda hoping mostert plays...i also have cam akers, but no

jefferson had 4 catches on five targets for 103 yards...anderson has definitely been getting more targets, but i think jefferson will start to get more...plus he's going against the hawks putrid pass def...i'm probably going to stick with anderson though...i've taken him late in drafts a lot because watching he's super talented, just such bad qb play with the jets
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85156
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

lennytheweedwhacker wrote:i'm thinking the same on mostert...he is a morning or game time decision, so i'm going to leave mixon in for now...i'm not big on him anyway this week vs the ravens so i'm kinda hoping mostert plays...i also have cam akers, but no

jefferson had 4 catches on five targets for 103 yards...anderson has definitely been getting more targets, but i think jefferson will start to get more...plus he's going against the hawks putrid pass def...i'm probably going to stick with anderson though...i've taken him late in drafts a lot because watching he's super talented, just such bad qb play with the jets
:thumbsup:
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 48511
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

i've got to trust my instincts, and let go of regret
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
Peeps
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7388
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 12:41 pm

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Peeps »

picked up AB

this is either a terrible decision or makes me GM of the year
Did the Mother Fucker pay extra to yell?
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Mickey »

Peeps wrote:picked up AB

this is either a terrible decision or makes me GM of the year
I have low expectations for this one. Tampa's already pretty deep in terms of pass-catchers (Evans, Godwin, Miller, Gronk) so even if he gets on the field, how many targets does he get?
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85156
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

Mickey wrote:
Peeps wrote:picked up AB

this is either a terrible decision or makes me GM of the year
I have low expectations for this one. Tampa's already pretty deep in terms of pass-catchers (Evans, Godwin, Miller, Gronk) so even if he gets on the field, how many targets does he get?
Brady isn't gelling well with Evans. Godwin had injury issues but also plays a complimentary roll to AB. Miller is literally nothing. Gronk is coming on.

Seeing reports that Brady requested AB. If that's true, I can see him having a substantial target share.

The question is what shape is AB in?

I also picked him up in one league just as a safely net and to keep him off opposing rosters.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Mickey »

Maybe. Like I said, low expectations. I can easily see a future of spotty production, a good game here or there but nothing like the old days.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85156
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

Mickey wrote:Maybe. Like I said, low expectations. I can easily see a future of spotty production, a good game here or there but nothing like the old days.
Well that I totally agree with. It could realistically go either way.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Mickey »

Sitting 2-5 after being snakebit by injuries (Thomas and Ekeler lol)
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85156
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

I'm somehow #1 in one league and #2 in another.

Bananas.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Mickey »

Okay don't rub it in.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85156
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

My WRs currently are:
T. Hill
J. Jones
T. Higgins
C. Claypool
M. Brown
A. Brown

I need RB help with Chubb on IR for another 3 or 4 weeks and J. Robinson on bye.

Would you give up Tyreek Hill for Kareem Hunt and Lev Bell? That's the trade I've been offered.
User avatar
Monkey_Driven
The Master
Posts: 28128
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
Location: Mushroom Kingdom

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Monkey_Driven »

My entire bench is either injured or on IR.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Mickey »

Joey, do you guys play two WR each week plus flex or three?
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85156
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

Mickey wrote:Joey, do you guys play two WR each week plus flex or three?
2 and a flex
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Mickey »

That's a bad return for Hill but if you think the rb help from Hunt will carry you over the line it's not a bad play, you're pretty deep at WR.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 85156
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by epilogue »

Yeah, I turned down the trade. I might regret it if AB returns to form right away. But there were just too many unknowns in the trade.

Will Hunt be hindered by Chubb (whom I already roster) in a couple of weeks? What kind of role will Bell play in KC? Etc...

Hill has been my most reliable receiver this year. That's difficult to give up. Especially in a league where one can roster only s single Chiefs player.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Mickey »

Especially being in 1st/2nd already, you probably don't need stopgaps and can cruise out to prepare for the playoffs.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: Fantasy Football Discussion

Post by Mickey »

Meanwhile I'm trying to move Thomas for anyone at RB so I can hopefully win one game??
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Post Reply