Election 2020

[Bi_3]

"Nationally, voters have cast 54.4% of the total votes counted in the 2016 general election."

*Texas at 90.8% 91.2% of 2016

Up to 94.1% this morning. Ya'll are crushing it.

[Orpheus]

What can I say, we want this dumb motherfucker gone yesterday.

[Bi_3]

Imagine a scenario in which Biden wins the pop by like 8-10M votes, the blue team takes the Senate and keeps the House, but the Electoral College gives Turnip the Oval Office. Can an incumbent be impeached before being sworn in for a second term? Would he need to be impeached again?

[wease]

Imagine a scenario in which Biden wins the pop by like 8-10M votes, the blue team takes the Senate and keeps the House, but the Electoral College gives Turnip the Oval Office. Can an incumbent be impeached before being sworn in for a second term? Would he need to be impeached again?

He could be impeached and even removed from office before 1/20/21. However, to keep him from serving his second term, it would have to be mandated that he can’t serve any more terms. And if that happened, I guess Pence would be sworn in. Of course the new senate members wouldn’t be sworn in until 1/3/21, so they wouldn’t have very much time.

[4/5]

Imagine a scenario in which Biden wins the pop by like 8-10M votes, the blue team takes the Senate and keeps the House, but the Electoral College gives Turnip the Oval Office. Can an incumbent be impeached before being sworn in for a second term? Would he need to be impeached again?

Remember, 2/3 to convict in the Senate. And he was already acquitted of those charges, so yes he'd need to be impeached again.

[B]

Imagine a scenario in which Biden wins the pop by like 8-10M votes, the blue team takes the Senate and keeps the House, but the Electoral College gives Turnip the Oval Office. Can an incumbent be impeached before being sworn in for a second term? Would he need to be impeached again?

Remember, 2/3 to convict in the Senate. And he was already acquitted of those charges, so yes he'd need to be impeached again.

I'm pretty sure they could charge him with some of his other crimes.

[Monkey_Driven]

Imagine a scenario in which Biden wins the pop by like 8-10M votes, the blue team takes the Senate and keeps the House, but the Electoral College gives Turnip the Oval Office. Can an incumbent be impeached before being sworn in for a second term? Would he need to be impeached again?

Remember, 2/3 to convict in the Senate. And he was already acquitted of those charges, so yes he'd need to be impeached again.

I'm pretty sure they could charge him with some of his other crimes.

A better question would be which ones to include.

[B]

Imagine a scenario in which Biden wins the pop by like 8-10M votes, the blue team takes the Senate and keeps the House, but the Electoral College gives Turnip the Oval Office. Can an incumbent be impeached before being sworn in for a second term? Would he need to be impeached again?

Remember, 2/3 to convict in the Senate. And he was already acquitted of those charges, so yes he'd need to be impeached again.

I'm pretty sure they could charge him with some of his other crimes.

A better question would be which ones to include.

We've got :
B - Violation of the Hatch Act
N - Violation of the Emoluments Clause
O - Treason

Oh? Ah, yes, looks like we have a winner!

[4/5]

But they're not getting 2/3 of the Senate, so....

And besides that would be the most absurdly naked power grab in American history in the scenario described.

[B]

But they're not getting 2/3 of the Senate, so....

And besides that would be the most absurdly naked power grab in American history in the scenario described.

There have been a lot of absurdly naked power grabs lately. Are you sure about your statement?

[4/5]

But they're not getting 2/3 of the Senate, so....

And besides that would be the most absurdly naked power grab in American history in the scenario described.

There have been a lot of absurdly naked power grabs lately. Are you sure about your statement?

To impeach a president because he won the election? And presumably the VP because if not, what's the point? Yeah, I stand by it.

(Note: he should have been impeached and removed years ago for many different reasons. And if were to win again I'm sure he will continue to do things worthy of removal. But basically impeaching and removing because he won is just a different level.)

[B]

But they're not getting 2/3 of the Senate, so....

And besides that would be the most absurdly naked power grab in American history in the scenario described.

There have been a lot of absurdly naked power grabs lately. Are you sure about your statement?

To impeach a president because he won the election? And presumably the VP because if not, what's the point? Yeah, I stand by it.

(Note: he should have been impeached and removed years ago for many different reasons. And if were to win again I'm sure he will continue to do things worthy of removal. But basically impeaching and removing because he won is just a different level.)

Maybe we can hire Mitch McConnell to make the public arguments for it.

"The Constitution allows this, so I don't understand your outrage? Several Presidents have been impeached in the history of this nation, some as recently as last year. Opposing this action shows a contempt for the American Constitution."

[McParadigm]

Why are you doing this

[B]

Why are you doing this

What else are we going to do 5 days before the election? Do call banking for the Democrats in battleground states? Pffft!

[4/5]

Why are you doing this

What else are we going to do 5 days before the election civil war? Do call banking for the Democrats in battleground states? Build back a better bunker? Pffft!

[Mickey]

Trump second term with a Democrat house and senate could be very, very funny.

[B]

Supreme Court Allows Longer Deadlines for Absentee Ballots in Pennsylvania and North Carolina
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/28/us/s ... llots.html

Wisconsin can't count mail-in ballots received after election day, supreme court rules
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/oc ... ection-day

I get the subtleties of state laws and which party is in control of what, that led to these two headlines, but how does the lower-information general public absorb this?

The Supreme Court allows NC and PA to count ballots after election day, but WI isn't allowed to do that? So, voters in NC and PA get heard if they put their ballot in the mailbox on Election Day, but in Wisconsin, you're vote is subject to the speed of the US mail? Don't Wisconsinites deserve equal protection under the 14th Amendment? This is the kind of state-by-state nonsense that needs to be fixed. It's one of many things that is good for Democrats and, y'know, just morally right.

John Lewis Voting Rights Act NOW!!!!

[Mickey]

God I just can't imagine we're doing this shit for the next ten days.

[Bi_3]

God I just can't imagine we're doing this shit for the next ten days.

The next two months will be unlike anything before this year.

[spike]

God I just can't imagine we're doing this shit for the next ten days.

The next two months will be unlike anything before this year.

Will give us something to do when we're all in lockdown.