Song of the Moment: Sirens
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
No, really. If they go the route of having a greatest hits devoted to the post-2003 era, it will do alright. They've done alright at radio on the last three albums. Just Breathe and Fixer continue to be among their more sought out tracks at streaming sites.
But I don't think they'll go that route. The typical thing is just to create an all new from-scratch hits collection.
But I don't think they'll go that route. The typical thing is just to create an all new from-scratch hits collection.
(patriotic choking noises)
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 45833
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
you'll still be able to find unsold copies of backspacer in the dumpster at any Target, so basically you'd just be rebuying Lightning Bolt.VinylGuy wrote:IlluminEddie wrote:stupidmop wrote:Er...Binaural and Riot Act.....cause bush was president.....and eddie wasn't a hypocrite back then??!!IlluminEddie wrote:If they released a best of: Lightning Bolt and Backspacer vs. Binaural and Riot Act...a few years from now... which would "fly off the shelves" faster?stupidmop wrote:It's gonna fly off the shelves for sure.McParadigm wrote:Mind Your Manners: Greatest Hits 2003-2013.stupidmop wrote:'pearl jam shunned fame and the mainstream so they could do whatever they wanted, how cool, until 2006ish maybe 2009 when they decided they kind of missed all of it *cue fixer, just breathe, sirens*
Nah, they would get slaughtered. And the reason is, as much as some 'here' hate Backspacer (and now songs like Sirens from LB), the people who buy PJs music in mass don't. Those who think their worst-liked albums (Riot Act and Binaural) are the best, should probably come to the realization that they are PJ hipsters... and PJ doesn't really care about them.
ohh let the hatred begin in...1, 2, 3...
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- Mine
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
That isn't happening any time soon IMO mostly because of the rights to the songs. Have they stayed with Sony the story would be different.McParadigm wrote:No, really. If they go the route of having a greatest hits devoted to the post-2003 era, it will do alright. They've done alright at radio on the last three albums. Just Breathe and Fixer continue to be among their more sought out tracks at streaming sites.
But I don't think they'll go that route. The typical thing is just to create an all new from-scratch hits collection.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36491
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
I don't understand how they didn't correct it in post. It's really easy to do, considering how they seem to have recorded the video.harmless wrote:Yep. It's what made me say "I'll keep the studio version, cheers." He frequently makes those flubs live but they allowed this one into the video... eek.thegroovologist wrote:By the way...have you noticed that one of Matt's intro fills is not in time ?
The fill at 0:13 >>>
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- Dr. Van Nostrand
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8898
- Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
VinylGuy wrote:I woke up with Sirens in my head...and i had to listen to it. 3 times in my way to work...This song is that good.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Is there any reason to assume animosity between them? Because it's no big thing for a band to go independent and then continue to work with their former label on compilations and reissues. It's like printing money. Everybody wins.Mine wrote:That isn't happening any time soon IMO mostly because of the rights to the songs. Have they stayed with Sony the story would be different.McParadigm wrote:No, really. If they go the route of having a greatest hits devoted to the post-2003 era, it will do alright. They've done alright at radio on the last three albums. Just Breathe and Fixer continue to be among their more sought out tracks at streaming sites.
But I don't think they'll go that route. The typical thing is just to create an all new from-scratch hits collection.
(patriotic choking noises)
- stupidmop
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2796
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Maybe they left it in so it's more authentically/obviously live.theplatypus wrote:I don't understand how they didn't correct it in post. It's really easy to do, considering how they seem to have recorded the video.harmless wrote:Yep. It's what made me say "I'll keep the studio version, cheers." He frequently makes those flubs live but they allowed this one into the video... eek.thegroovologist wrote:By the way...have you noticed that one of Matt's intro fills is not in time ?
The fill at 0:13 >>>
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Yup.theplatypus wrote:I don't understand how they didn't correct it in post. It's really easy to do, considering how they seem to have recorded the video.harmless wrote:Yep. It's what made me say "I'll keep the studio version, cheers." He frequently makes those flubs live but they allowed this one into the video... eek.thegroovologist wrote:By the way...have you noticed that one of Matt's intro fills is not in time ?
The fill at 0:13 >>>
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35407
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
theplatypus wrote:I don't understand how they didn't correct it in post. It's really easy to do, considering how they seem to have recorded the video.harmless wrote:Yep. It's what made me say "I'll keep the studio version, cheers." He frequently makes those flubs live but they allowed this one into the video... eek.thegroovologist wrote:By the way...have you noticed that one of Matt's intro fills is not in time ?
The fill at 0:13 >>>
It doesnt really feel out of time, he just doesnt come in on the "1", or forgets too, its still in time though.
- dprival78
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2145
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:13 pm
- Location: CT
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
it seems like they went out of their way to show that this was a live performance.
leaving in the matt flub, focusing on mike as he changed guitars, keeping eddie in the shot when he strapped on his guitar during mike's solo, zooming in on ken during one of his slightly off-time piano-key bashes, etc.
leaving in the matt flub, focusing on mike as he changed guitars, keeping eddie in the shot when he strapped on his guitar during mike's solo, zooming in on ken during one of his slightly off-time piano-key bashes, etc.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
No, he pretty much Ringo Starrs one of his fills. There are other minor timing issues during the song, and a few pitchy moments, which are all part of why I prefer this to the studio version.Strat wrote:It doesnt really feel out of time, he just doesnt come in on the "1", or forgets too, its still in time though.
Sounds like a band.
(patriotic choking noises)
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
WUTStrat wrote:theplatypus wrote:I don't understand how they didn't correct it in post. It's really easy to do, considering how they seem to have recorded the video.harmless wrote:Yep. It's what made me say "I'll keep the studio version, cheers." He frequently makes those flubs live but they allowed this one into the video... eek.thegroovologist wrote:By the way...have you noticed that one of Matt's intro fills is not in time ?
The fill at 0:13 >>>
It doesnt really feel out of time, he just doesnt come in on the "1", or forgets too, its still in time though.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- tommymtcom
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4306
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:49 pm
- Location: there all is aching
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
I bet Jeff cares about us.IlluminEddie wrote:stupidmop wrote:Er...Binaural and Riot Act.....cause bush was president.....and eddie wasn't a hypocrite back then??!!IlluminEddie wrote:If they released a best of: Lightning Bolt and Backspacer vs. Binaural and Riot Act...a few years from now... which would "fly off the shelves" faster?stupidmop wrote:It's gonna fly off the shelves for sure.McParadigm wrote:Mind Your Manners: Greatest Hits 2003-2013.stupidmop wrote:'pearl jam shunned fame and the mainstream so they could do whatever they wanted, how cool, until 2006ish maybe 2009 when they decided they kind of missed all of it *cue fixer, just breathe, sirens*
Nah, they would get slaughtered. And the reason is, as much as some 'here' hate Backspacer (and now songs like Sirens from LB), the people who buy PJs music in mass don't. Those who think their worst-liked albums (Riot Act and Binaural) are the best, should probably come to the realization that they are PJ hipsters... and PJ doesn't really care about them.
E.H. Ruddock wrote:What a great post, tommy
- EJ
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7053
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
dprival78 wrote:it seems like they went out of their way to show that this was a live performance.
leaving in the matt flub, focusing on mike as he changed guitars, keeping eddie in the shot when he strapped on his guitar during mike's solo, zooming in on ken during one of his slightly off-time piano-key bashes, etc.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36491
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
No no, that's out of time.Strat wrote:theplatypus wrote:I don't understand how they didn't correct it in post. It's really easy to do, considering how they seem to have recorded the video.harmless wrote:Yep. It's what made me say "I'll keep the studio version, cheers." He frequently makes those flubs live but they allowed this one into the video... eek.thegroovologist wrote:By the way...have you noticed that one of Matt's intro fills is not in time ?
The fill at 0:13 >>>
It doesnt really feel out of time, he just doesnt come in on the "1", or forgets too, its still in time though.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
These mistakes are kind of a continuation of things I already don't like about Matt... so yeah, it diminishes my enjoyment of what otherwise is a great music video.McParadigm wrote:No, he pretty much Ringo Starrs one of his fills. There are other minor timing issues during the song, and a few pitchy moments, which are all part of why I prefer this to the studio version.Strat wrote:It doesnt really feel out of time, he just doesnt come in on the "1", or forgets too, its still in time though.
Sounds like a band.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
I like broken things.harmless wrote:These mistakes are kind of a continuation of things I already don't like about Matt... so yeah, it diminishes my enjoyment of what otherwise is a great music video.
(patriotic choking noises)
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
And yet retracking almost all of the vocals?dprival78 wrote:it seems like they went out of their way to show that this was a live performance.
leaving in the matt flub, focusing on mike as he changed guitars, keeping eddie in the shot when he strapped on his guitar during mike's solo, zooming in on ken during one of his slightly off-time piano-key bashes, etc.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
McParadigm wrote:I like broken things.harmless wrote:These mistakes are kind of a continuation of things I already don't like about Matt... so yeah, it diminishes my enjoyment of what otherwise is a great music video.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
-
IlluminEddie
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 460
- Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 8:16 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Problem is that the few copies of Backspacer found "in the dumpster" may actually outweigh the sales of Riot Act and Binaural combined. I think most people just didn't dig the shit songs like Evacuation. Don't get me wrong - Light Years is a classic - there were a few on em', but in total - the crap bullets like You Are and Get Right killed any momentum. Basically, the sales data show Riot Act and Binaural are the band's worst albums. It's just a sad fact for RM hipsters that Backspacer (in relative terms) was well received. Songs like Sirens will be too. So, let's go back to talking about the depth of a song like Breakerfall.BurtReynolds wrote:you'll still be able to find unsold copies of backspacer in the dumpster at any Target, so basically you'd just be rebuying Lightning Bolt.VinylGuy wrote:IlluminEddie wrote:stupidmop wrote:Er...Binaural and Riot Act.....cause bush was president.....and eddie wasn't a hypocrite back then??!!IlluminEddie wrote:If they released a best of: Lightning Bolt and Backspacer vs. Binaural and Riot Act...a few years from now... which would "fly off the shelves" faster?stupidmop wrote:It's gonna fly off the shelves for sure.McParadigm wrote:Mind Your Manners: Greatest Hits 2003-2013.stupidmop wrote:'pearl jam shunned fame and the mainstream so they could do whatever they wanted, how cool, until 2006ish maybe 2009 when they decided they kind of missed all of it *cue fixer, just breathe, sirens*
Nah, they would get slaughtered. And the reason is, as much as some 'here' hate Backspacer (and now songs like Sirens from LB), the people who buy PJs music in mass don't. Those who think their worst-liked albums (Riot Act and Binaural) are the best, should probably come to the realization that they are PJ hipsters... and PJ doesn't really care about them.
ohh let the hatred begin in...1, 2, 3...