Lightning Bolt: the official album thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Rank Lightning Bolt

5 stars
1
1%
4 stars
4
5%
3 stars
29
37%
2 stars
30
38%
1 star
14
18%
 
Total votes: 78

sward
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 4:46 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by sward »

harmless wrote:
digster wrote:I don't really get how Black is 'generic', unless we're calling every single slow simple song generic.
Right. But I don't get why "Sirens" is either, except for a few radio production flourishes that I kind of wish weren't there but I can't get rid of.
I have no idea how Sirens is generic either. Definitely don't think the video version is generic. There's some polish on the studio track, but I find that I don't notice it as much at this point.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

Mine wrote:
stupidmop wrote:Ignoring the vocals, black has this laid back dreamy quality in the music during the verses that makes it pretty interesting to me. If you took eds voice away from sirens i dont think theres anything there that grabs me/stands out.

Neither are an excersize in mindblowing originality however.
Yeah but there are a shitload of similar ballads from the late 80's. "E-Ballad" followed a clear pattern it's even named accordingly.
Caveat: I really, really love Black.

But I find it a fairly standard rock ballad transformed by angst, heaviness and minor chords. Make those chords major (happy) ones, take away Ed's mournful rage, reduce the guitars down, and you have something fairly close to "Sirens". I mean, even the "Hear the sirens" part at the beginning is reminiscent of the "mmmmm" intro of Black, and the piano outro of Black could be compared to the piano / xylophone of "Sirens", and the "uh-uh, oh-oh" of "Sirens" could be replaced by the "doo-doo-doo" of Black. All of these are fairly standard ballad structure features designed to tickle the ears of radio listeners.
Last edited by harmless on Thu September 19, 2013 3:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
solace
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:29 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by solace »

I have to admit, I actually laughed out loud the first time I watched the video and heard Ed sing the opening 2 lines... I really wish he sung that part in his lower/more natural baritone.

I also kinda cringe during the "but all things change" part when his voice cracks.
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by stupidmop »

harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
stupidmop wrote:Ignoring the vocals, black has this laid back dreamy quality in the music during the verses that makes it pretty interesting to me. If you took eds voice away from sirens i dont think theres anything there that grabs me/stands out.

Neither are an excersize in mindblowing originality however.
Yeah but there are a shitload of similar ballads from the late 80's. "E-Ballad" followed a clear pattern it's even named accordingly.
Caveat: I really, really love Black.

But I find it a fairly standard rock ballad transformed by angst, heaviness and minor chords. Make those chords major (happy) ones, take away Ed's mournful rage, reduce the guitars down, and you have something fairly close to "Sirens". I mean, even the "Hear the sirens" part at the beginning is reminiscent of the "mmmmm" intro of Black, and the piano outro of Black could be compared to the piano / xylophone of "Sirens", and the "uh-uh, oh-oh" of "Sirens" could be replaced by the "doo-doo-doo" of Black. All of these are fairly standard ballad structure features designed to tickle the ears of radio listeners.
Basically they already wrote the song and had no reason to do it again :ohyeah!:
Spoiler: show
i'm kidding btw
Last edited by stupidmop on Thu September 19, 2013 3:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

Would you guys cut the shit

Sirens is fkn AMAZING!

Even the video is fkn good----------
User avatar
Mirella
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 311
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 9:26 pm
Location: Vlaardingen, the Netherlands

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Mirella »

So, what happens today? :).

groetjes,
Mirella :) (it was played on Dutch radio this morning and I hope it will be mentioned in a TV program as well. It depends on the guests)
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Mine »

harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
stupidmop wrote:Ignoring the vocals, black has this laid back dreamy quality in the music during the verses that makes it pretty interesting to me. If you took eds voice away from sirens i dont think theres anything there that grabs me/stands out.

Neither are an excersize in mindblowing originality however.
Yeah but there are a shitload of similar ballads from the late 80's. "E-Ballad" followed a clear pattern it's even named accordingly.
Caveat: I really, really love Black.

But I find it a fairly standard rock ballad transformed by angst, heaviness and minor chords. Make those chords major (happy) ones, take away Ed's mournful rage, reduce the guitars down, and you have something fairly close to "Sirens". I mean, even the "Hear the sirens" part at the beginning is reminiscent of the "mmmmm" intro of Black, and the piano outro of Black could be compared to the piano / xylophone of "Sirens", and the "uh-uh, oh-oh" of "Sirens" could be replaced by the "doo-doo-doo" of Black. All of these are fairly standard ballad structure features designed to tickle the ears of radio listeners.
Drown the "hear the sirens" intro in reverb and you could convince a lot of people is a Ten outtake.

A ballad in E and minor chords it's songwriting 101 which is generic by definition. The song turned out spectacular by early 90's standards and a lot of this has to do with it's generic qualities.
About Black i like it better live now because Ed's less dramatic delivery doesn't make it sounded as dated as the studio version.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

stupidmop wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
stupidmop wrote:Ignoring the vocals, black has this laid back dreamy quality in the music during the verses that makes it pretty interesting to me. If you took eds voice away from sirens i dont think theres anything there that grabs me/stands out.

Neither are an excersize in mindblowing originality however.
Yeah but there are a shitload of similar ballads from the late 80's. "E-Ballad" followed a clear pattern it's even named accordingly.
Caveat: I really, really love Black.

But I find it a fairly standard rock ballad transformed by angst, heaviness and minor chords. Make those chords major (happy) ones, take away Ed's mournful rage, reduce the guitars down, and you have something fairly close to "Sirens". I mean, even the "Hear the sirens" part at the beginning is reminiscent of the "mmmmm" intro of Black, and the piano outro of Black could be compared to the piano / xylophone of "Sirens", and the "uh-uh, oh-oh" of "Sirens" could be replaced by the "doo-doo-doo" of Black. All of these are fairly standard ballad structure features designed to tickle the ears of radio listeners.
Basically they already wrote the song and had no reason to do it again :ohyeah!:
It's an argument that could contribute to the thesis that both of the songs are generic, because apparently the 80s rock ballad also wrote "Black" so it was already unnecessary.

What I'm saying is, to me 'Black' could be seen as an 80s rock ballad with a 90's "grunge" aesthetic. This song is whatever the influences are (80s-ballad included) with a 2013 "popular" aesthetic. It just depends on whether you mind, or not. I think people are responding to the song's aesthetic rather than the song itself. Or maybe you can't separate the song's "aesthetic" from the song itself, and people are just responding according to their aesthetic taste. But, well, 'Black' and 'Sirens' are cut from the same rock cloth.

What's a rock cloth? I probably don't want to know.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Heathen
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3988
Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Heathen »

Mirella wrote:So, what happens today?
Best case scenario is the short bus crashes and IlluminEddie dies.
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by EJ »

I wish you guys would stop talking about Black.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Mine »

stupidmop wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
stupidmop wrote:Ignoring the vocals, black has this laid back dreamy quality in the music during the verses that makes it pretty interesting to me. If you took eds voice away from sirens i dont think theres anything there that grabs me/stands out.

Neither are an excersize in mindblowing originality however.
Yeah but there are a shitload of similar ballads from the late 80's. "E-Ballad" followed a clear pattern it's even named accordingly.
Caveat: I really, really love Black.

But I find it a fairly standard rock ballad transformed by angst, heaviness and minor chords. Make those chords major (happy) ones, take away Ed's mournful rage, reduce the guitars down, and you have something fairly close to "Sirens". I mean, even the "Hear the sirens" part at the beginning is reminiscent of the "mmmmm" intro of Black, and the piano outro of Black could be compared to the piano / xylophone of "Sirens", and the "uh-uh, oh-oh" of "Sirens" could be replaced by the "doo-doo-doo" of Black. All of these are fairly standard ballad structure features designed to tickle the ears of radio listeners.
Basically they already wrote the song and had no reason to do it again :ohyeah!:
Spoiler: show
i'm kidding btw
:haha:
You know music may as well cease to exist following this logic. At least a good 98% of it.
User avatar
stupidmop
Future Drummer
Posts: 2796
Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 4:29 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by stupidmop »

Mine wrote:
stupidmop wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
stupidmop wrote:Ignoring the vocals, black has this laid back dreamy quality in the music during the verses that makes it pretty interesting to me. If you took eds voice away from sirens i dont think theres anything there that grabs me/stands out.

Neither are an excersize in mindblowing originality however.
Yeah but there are a shitload of similar ballads from the late 80's. "E-Ballad" followed a clear pattern it's even named accordingly.
Caveat: I really, really love Black.

But I find it a fairly standard rock ballad transformed by angst, heaviness and minor chords. Make those chords major (happy) ones, take away Ed's mournful rage, reduce the guitars down, and you have something fairly close to "Sirens". I mean, even the "Hear the sirens" part at the beginning is reminiscent of the "mmmmm" intro of Black, and the piano outro of Black could be compared to the piano / xylophone of "Sirens", and the "uh-uh, oh-oh" of "Sirens" could be replaced by the "doo-doo-doo" of Black. All of these are fairly standard ballad structure features designed to tickle the ears of radio listeners.
Basically they already wrote the song and had no reason to do it again :ohyeah!:
Spoiler: show
i'm kidding btw
:haha:
You know music may as well cease to exist following this logic. At least a good 98% of it.
I'm just talking the piss, i don't know nearly enough about music to have a serious discussion about it, and yet i keep jumping in :lol:
User avatar
BDB
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 736
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 12:20 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by BDB »

who had 9/19 in the 1,000 page poll?
nightmareblack0206
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 531
Joined: Sat March 02, 2013 2:57 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by nightmareblack0206 »

EJ wrote:I wish you guys would stop talking about Black.

Im with you on this
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

BDB wrote:who had 9/19 in the 1,000 page poll?
You think it will get there today?
User avatar
Blenheim Augustine
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 675
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 1:12 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Blenheim Augustine »

solace wrote:I also kinda cringe during the "but all things change" part when his voice cracks.
I :heartbeat: those lines. Because it's something he rarely does it really draws attention but without it that section would start feeling repetitive.
While a Western guitar motif lost on the swings drum bass fusion, get your own thoughts into the subconscious often forgotten. "Pendulum" is a sweeping soul from the ballast.
User avatar
BDB
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 736
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 12:20 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by BDB »

Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
BDB wrote:who had 9/19 in the 1,000 page poll?
You think it will get there today?
judging by yesterday's volume - maybe.
maybe an in depth comparision of Sirens and Nothingman, and how both songs are generic will get us there.
User avatar
Blenheim Augustine
likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
Posts: 675
Joined: Wed January 16, 2013 1:12 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Blenheim Augustine »

Mine wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
stupidmop wrote:Ignoring the vocals, black has this laid back dreamy quality in the music during the verses that makes it pretty interesting to me. If you took eds voice away from sirens i dont think theres anything there that grabs me/stands out.

Neither are an excersize in mindblowing originality however.
Yeah but there are a shitload of similar ballads from the late 80's. "E-Ballad" followed a clear pattern it's even named accordingly.
Caveat: I really, really love Black.

But I find it a fairly standard rock ballad transformed by angst, heaviness and minor chords. Make those chords major (happy) ones, take away Ed's mournful rage, reduce the guitars down, and you have something fairly close to "Sirens". I mean, even the "Hear the sirens" part at the beginning is reminiscent of the "mmmmm" intro of Black, and the piano outro of Black could be compared to the piano / xylophone of "Sirens", and the "uh-uh, oh-oh" of "Sirens" could be replaced by the "doo-doo-doo" of Black. All of these are fairly standard ballad structure features designed to tickle the ears of radio listeners.
Drown the "hear the sirens" intro in reverb and you could convince a lot of people is a Ten outtake.

A ballad in E and minor chords it's songwriting 101 which is generic by definition. The song turned out spectacular by early 90's standards and a lot of this has to do with it's generic qualities.
About Black i like it better live now because Ed's less dramatic delivery doesn't make it sounded as dated as the studio version.
Actually the first chord in Black is an E7. It only goes to Em in the choruses. The chorus is uplifting because there is a key change. The E7 / A verse implies that it is in A yet when it goes to the verse it switches to the key of Em. That gives it a great light (A) shade (Em) feel and the Mike's solo patterns shift from E major pentatonic to Em pentatonic.
While a Western guitar motif lost on the swings drum bass fusion, get your own thoughts into the subconscious often forgotten. "Pendulum" is a sweeping soul from the ballast.
User avatar
Dr. Van Nostrand
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8898
Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Dr. Van Nostrand »

BDB wrote:
Dr. Van Nostrand wrote:
BDB wrote:who had 9/19 in the 1,000 page poll?
You think it will get there today?
judging by yesterday's volume - maybe.
maybe an in depth comparision of Sirens and Nothingman, and how both songs are generic will get us there.
lets see how it goes :lol:
User avatar
solace
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:29 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by solace »

Blenheim Augustine wrote:
solace wrote:I also kinda cringe during the "but all things change" part when his voice cracks.
I :heartbeat: those lines. Because it's something he rarely does it really draws attention but without it that section would start feeling repetitive.
I always cringe when singers reach too far beyond their range and strain I guess, it's not just Ed. I hate when Patterson Hood tries to sing falsetto too.
Post Reply