Song of the Moment: Sirens

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

So...Sirens?

5 stars
47
38%
4 stars
30
24%
3 stars
25
20%
2 stars
7
6%
1 star
16
13%
 
Total votes: 125

User avatar
Jaeti
Future Drummer
Posts: 2641
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Jaeti »

Sorry if this is a re-post, but I just came across it. I put it in the LB thread, too.

http://www.antiquiet.com/news/2013/09/p ... th-sirens/
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

Strat wrote:Really cracks me up when women bring up ed having a model wife as part of their distaste for PJ music these days...

Its....

Interesting....
I really don't think this is a happy little love song about happy happiness, either. It makes me feel pretty sad, and for all the right reasons. I'm probably playing it too much... it's doing all the things a melancholy song should do.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
malice
post-structuralist
Posts: 4377
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm
Location: faked by jorge

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by malice »

Strat wrote:Really cracks me up when women bring up ed having a model wife as part of their distaste for PJ music these days...

Its....

Interesting....
shut up, strat. you're grasping at straws here, and I'm not interested in this kind of bullshit male egotism wrapped up in what you poorly try to disguise as 'interesting' - if you don't think ed's marriage (second marriage at that) to a beautiful younger woman was a thorough disappointment to someone like myself who always had a tremendous amount of respect for him as someone from my generation who was sincere in his views, only to observe him give in to every stupid and insecure stereotype that he used to rail against, then you know- not really my issue- you think it's cool? good - I don't. I think it's typical and thus disappointing behavior from what used to be an extraordinary icon of the 90s.
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
Spoiler: show
people change. people stay the same. people are so often disappointing - random PM, person unnamed
User avatar
malice
post-structuralist
Posts: 4377
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm
Location: faked by jorge

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by malice »

harmless wrote:
Strat wrote:Really cracks me up when women bring up ed having a model wife as part of their distaste for PJ music these days...

Its....

Interesting....
I really don't think this is a happy little love song about happy happiness, either. It makes me feel pretty sad, and for all the right reasons. I'm probably playing it too much... it's doing all the things a melancholy song should do.
everyone is allowed their opinion. so am I
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
Spoiler: show
people change. people stay the same. people are so often disappointing - random PM, person unnamed
IlluminEddie
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 460
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 8:16 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by IlluminEddie »

malice wrote:
Strat wrote:Really cracks me up when women bring up ed having a model wife as part of their distaste for PJ music these days...

Its....

Interesting....
shut up, strat. you're grasping at straws here, and I'm not interested in this kind of bullshit male egotism wrapped up in what you poorly try to disguise as 'interesting' - if you don't think ed's marriage (second marriage at that) to a beautiful younger woman was a thorough disappointment to someone like myself who always had a tremendous amount of respect for him as someone from my generation who was sincere in his views, only to observe him give in to every stupid and insecure stereotype that he used to rail against, then you know- not really my issue- you think it's cool? good - I don't. I think it's typical and thus disappointing behavior from what used to be an extraordinary icon of the 90s.

Sorry to do this malice, but I agree with you. Ed's without a doubt a hypocrite. Here and elsewhere.

#riotactstillsucks
digster
Rank This Poster
Posts: 3972
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 1:10 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by digster »

IlluminEddie wrote:
I agree. But, in general, I think it's the best metric available particularly when discussing fan's rankings of ONE bands albums. Name an alternative.

A survey would probably be ideal, but it would have to be done on the street or something. Are you a Pearl Jam fan, ok rank these albums....
There's no need to name an alternative to prove that a shitty metric is a shitty metric.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Strat »

malice wrote:
Strat wrote:Really cracks me up when women bring up ed having a model wife as part of their distaste for PJ music these days...

Its....

Interesting....
shut up, strat. you're grasping at straws here, and I'm not interested in this kind of bullshit male egotism wrapped up in what you poorly try to disguise as 'interesting' - if you don't think ed's marriage (second marriage at that) to a beautiful younger woman was a thorough disappointment to someone like myself who always had a tremendous amount of respect for him as someone from my generation who was sincere in his views, only to observe him give in to every stupid and insecure stereotype that he used to rail against, then you know- not really my issue- you think it's cool? good - I don't. I think it's typical and thus disappointing behavior from what used to be an extraordinary icon of the 90s.

Certainly not going to get into any of this, but since you have no idea who his wife really is, the egotism and shallowism is quite apparent here...

And also, wow, calm down.
IlluminEddie
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 460
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 8:16 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by IlluminEddie »

VinylGuy wrote:
Music is subjective...A survey doesnt mean anything.
Specially with PJ, were people hate an album and a few years later is a classic.
I agree. It is, individually. But, in aggregate it's really not. A survey would make sense for ranking albums. Name an alternative.
User avatar
solace
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:29 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by solace »

malice wrote:
Strat wrote:Really cracks me up when women bring up ed having a model wife as part of their distaste for PJ music these days...

Its....

Interesting....
shut up, strat. you're grasping at straws here, and I'm not interested in this kind of bullshit male egotism wrapped up in what you poorly try to disguise as 'interesting' - if you don't think ed's marriage (second marriage at that) to a beautiful younger woman was a thorough disappointment to someone like myself who always had a tremendous amount of respect for him as someone from my generation who was sincere in his views, only to observe him give in to every stupid and insecure stereotype that he used to rail against, then you know- not really my issue- you think it's cool? good - I don't. I think it's typical and thus disappointing behavior from what used to be an extraordinary icon of the 90s.
But... You do realize the reason Ed and Beth got a divorce was because Beth was sleeping with a construction worker working on remodeling their house?
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by McParadigm »

malice wrote:I don't even recognize Sirens as a Pearl Jam song, honestly... it's an Ed's happy about being a happy dad in his happy life with his happy model wife song.
I agree.
Really cracks me up when women bring up ed having a model wife as part of their distaste for PJ music these days...
I don't see that the two were being correlated at all, here. Anyway, we all saw it coming when the Vitalogy reissue had the lyrical change "Model, role model, models are role models, yeah. Get some shit to stick on yourself, cos you're uglier than us (sound of high five)."
Second, it's impossible to completely grasp where Backspacer falls in the rankings because it hasn't been given enough time yet. Third, I agreed with you that the decline of the music industry sales in general also affects things here... but, that would actually negatively impact newer records (like Backspacer) more and older records (like Riot Act) less
Here's what it is: a lot of people would consider Backspacer superior to Riot Act. I believe that. Backspacer has a far greater outward reach than the previous three records, beyond the fanbase. That's a reality. But who cares? You know what happens when an older artist releases a commercially successful, critically acclaimed record? Everybody talks about it for a while like they're surprised, gets excited about it, then a few years later they've picked one or two songs to leave on their iTunes account and have gone back to talking about whichever of that artist's early records is considered the "masterpiece." Hooray.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

malice wrote:
harmless wrote:
Strat wrote:Really cracks me up when women bring up ed having a model wife as part of their distaste for PJ music these days...

Its....

Interesting....
I really don't think this is a happy little love song about happy happiness, either. It makes me feel pretty sad, and for all the right reasons. I'm probably playing it too much... it's doing all the things a melancholy song should do.
everyone is allowed their opinion. so am I
I wasn't affirming his model wife comment as much as adding a response to your happy little love song thing. I don't think it's happy. Not that it matters, anyway. I guess the model wife thing is what it is; I think we all see our wives as models if we love them, so I don't care how stereotypically beautiful anybody else's wife is but I still understand their love.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Thejambi
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4301
Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
Location: Potato

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Thejambi »

IlluminEddie wrote:
Thejambi wrote:
IlluminEddie wrote:
Heathen wrote:
IlluminEddie wrote:To me, this data really hammers home which album is the worst in the collection.
Which brings us back to the part where you're retardedly equaling sales with quality. Finally.
To pretend the two are unrelated is retarded.

Do you think The Who's worst selling album was the best? How about Pink Floyd's worst seller? Now, if you went to a random set of people and looked only at those who declared themselves as "fans" (nothing more, nothing less - no need for a fan club membership or spending hours of their day at a real cool website, they just said they are fans of Pink Floyd on a random survey they were given)... do you think that The Who or Pink Floyd's "fans" would rate their worst selling album as the best in terms of quality in aggregate? Do you think the worst sellers may end up at the bottom? I do - why - because I'm practical.

Sales are related to quality for ONE band's catalog. It doesn't work from band to band, or genre to genre... but, individually for one band from album to album it does.

Should that effect your thinking? No, but neither should the herd mentality of a website full of hipsters.

Sales can be inflated by circumstance, trends, a single ect. Sales have such a small bearing on the "quality" of an album.

I agree. But, in general, I think it's the best metric available particularly when discussing fan's rankings of ONE bands albums. Name an alternative.

A survey would probably be ideal, but it would have to be done on the street or something. Are you a Pearl Jam fan, ok rank these albums....
That still doesn't speak to "quality" which is a very ambiguous term.

Ten is Pearl Jams highest selling album. As a fan I put it in the middle. The only objective data from that is that I have an opinion. It has nothing to do with sales. Vitalogy-Binaural are in my opinion are the highest "quality" pearl jam albums. By sales individually and even combine they are "inferior" to Ten and Vs.

Last Kiss out sold Jeremy . What does that say?
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by McParadigm »

solace wrote:the reason Ed and Beth got a divorce was because Beth was sleeping with a construction worker working on remodeling their house?
I assumed it was a hitch hiker, for obvious reasons....
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
WaitingForBluey
Future Drummer
Posts: 2647
Joined: Thu March 21, 2013 1:08 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/homeforbed
Location: Pennsyltucky
Contact:

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by WaitingForBluey »

Jaeti wrote:Sorry if this is a re-post, but I just came across it. I put it in the LB thread, too.

http://www.antiquiet.com/news/2013/09/p ... th-sirens/
Don't worry, they'll never notice that it's a re-post. They're much too busy trying to solve the worlds problems.

Btw, that's one hell of a glowing review. I can't imagine this guys not already a huge Pearl Jam fan...
theplatypus wrote:A solo is when the guitar goes twiddly diddly
User avatar
malice
post-structuralist
Posts: 4377
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm
Location: faked by jorge

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by malice »

IlluminEddie wrote:
malice wrote:
Strat wrote:Really cracks me up when women bring up ed having a model wife as part of their distaste for PJ music these days...

Its....

Interesting....
shut up, strat. you're grasping at straws here, and I'm not interested in this kind of bullshit male egotism wrapped up in what you poorly try to disguise as 'interesting' - if you don't think ed's marriage (second marriage at that) to a beautiful younger woman was a thorough disappointment to someone like myself who always had a tremendous amount of respect for him as someone from my generation who was sincere in his views, only to observe him give in to every stupid and insecure stereotype that he used to rail against, then you know- not really my issue- you think it's cool? good - I don't. I think it's typical and thus disappointing behavior from what used to be an extraordinary icon of the 90s.

Sorry to do this malice, but I agree with you. Ed's without a doubt a hypocrite. Here and elsewhere.

#riotactstillsucks
and you know, I don't give a fuck what you think- it has nothing to do with your opinions expressed previously - i don't get much satisfaction out of reading otherwise rational and fairly intelligent younger people start up with the same tired crap whenever they see a good looking woman hanging off a rock star- it's not about the hypocracy ed displays - I expect it - he's like every other aging man I'm familiar with- and as such is normal.
it's about this younger group of people falling for the same shit the men from my generation fell for. so thanks for playing
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
Spoiler: show
people change. people stay the same. people are so often disappointing - random PM, person unnamed
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 45834
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by BurtReynolds »

malice wrote:it's an Ed's happy about being a happy dad in his happy life with his happy model wife song.
I think his pals at the private Malibu fundraisers can definitely relate. We aren't his target market anymore.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by Strat »

solace wrote:
malice wrote:
Strat wrote:Really cracks me up when women bring up ed having a model wife as part of their distaste for PJ music these days...

Its....

Interesting....
shut up, strat. you're grasping at straws here, and I'm not interested in this kind of bullshit male egotism wrapped up in what you poorly try to disguise as 'interesting' - if you don't think ed's marriage (second marriage at that) to a beautiful younger woman was a thorough disappointment to someone like myself who always had a tremendous amount of respect for him as someone from my generation who was sincere in his views, only to observe him give in to every stupid and insecure stereotype that he used to rail against, then you know- not really my issue- you think it's cool? good - I don't. I think it's typical and thus disappointing behavior from what used to be an extraordinary icon of the 90s.
But... You do realize the reason Ed and Beth got a divorce was because Beth was sleeping with a construction worker working on remodeling their house?

:)
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by VinylGuy »

IlluminEddie wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
Music is subjective...A survey doesnt mean anything.
Specially with PJ, were people hate an album and a few years later is a classic.
I agree. It is, individually. But, in aggregate it's really not. A survey would make sense for ranking albums. Name an alternative.
My point is:

There isnt one. Music, like other things related with art, is subjective. We can make an anual poll and the results are going to be different....because our views are going to be different...it doesnt really mean anything.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by harmless »

Who gives a fuck whether Ed's wife is a model or a fat Yugoslavian welder? I'm surprised anyone gives a shit or thinks it adds or takes away from a song, or his sincerity. To imply that he wouldn't be singing the same song, whoever his wife is, is pretty disrespectful in my opinion.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
malice
post-structuralist
Posts: 4377
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm
Location: faked by jorge

Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens

Post by malice »

solace wrote:
malice wrote:
Strat wrote:Really cracks me up when women bring up ed having a model wife as part of their distaste for PJ music these days...

Its....

Interesting....
shut up, strat. you're grasping at straws here, and I'm not interested in this kind of bullshit male egotism wrapped up in what you poorly try to disguise as 'interesting' - if you don't think ed's marriage (second marriage at that) to a beautiful younger woman was a thorough disappointment to someone like myself who always had a tremendous amount of respect for him as someone from my generation who was sincere in his views, only to observe him give in to every stupid and insecure stereotype that he used to rail against, then you know- not really my issue- you think it's cool? good - I don't. I think it's typical and thus disappointing behavior from what used to be an extraordinary icon of the 90s.
But... You do realize the reason Ed and Beth got a divorce was because Beth was sleeping with a construction worker working on remodeling their house?
so the fuck what? I don't give a flying fuck about why anyone gets divorced. I'm expressing my disgust about the idea that all you guys- and you're mostly guys on this board, so i feel fine in generalizing - you all seem to feel justified in this type of opinion (as what strat expressed- I'm not inferring you personally feel this way- I don't know you)
it's old fashioned male bullshit that assumes if you got an opportunity to marry a model, all you all would jump on that shit too- which, I'm here to let everyone know - it's not going to help you much in your own relationships as you all age. (again I don't know you, you could be my age, in which case, apologies, but I stand by my opinion)
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
Spoiler: show
people change. people stay the same. people are so often disappointing - random PM, person unnamed
Post Reply