what are you implying?harmless wrote:Well you implied a lot of things yourself, so...IlluminEddie wrote:harmless wrote:Nobody's said that though.IlluminEddie wrote:No, the logic is: anyone who thinks songs are higher quality because they are played less is an idiot.Thejambi wrote: Now the logic is only quality songs can be radio hits.
He "implied it". Once again, go read the full thing in context this time.
Song of the Moment: Sirens
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46239
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
BurtReynolds wrote:what are you implying?harmless wrote:Well you implied a lot of things yourself, so...IlluminEddie wrote:harmless wrote:Nobody's said that though.IlluminEddie wrote:No, the logic is: anyone who thinks songs are higher quality because they are played less is an idiot.Thejambi wrote: Now the logic is only quality songs can be radio hits.
He "implied it". Once again, go read the full thing in context this time.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- Heathen
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3988
- Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
still longing for that old, angry RM?stip wrote:I still like reading the older posts.Heathen wrote:deny all you want but if you're still here that means you're still a bit invested in this boardstip wrote:if RM doesn't hold my interest anymore I'm not sure it's worth the time. There's lots of other message boards I could be posting on.Heathen wrote:if you've read them only once I don't think you can really get these posts, you might have to start againstip wrote:phew, made it
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
- Mine
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
This.....this song has a weird effect on people 
- EJ
- Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
- Posts: 7053
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
I love Riot Act. Arc should've been the first single.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Meh. Arc is just a tired reworking of Ave Maria.EJ wrote:I love Riot Act. Arc should've been the first single.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85155
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
I'm just not sure I've seen anyone here making that claim, is all.IlluminEddie wrote:No, the logic is: anyone who thinks songs are higher quality because they are played less is an idiot.Thejambi wrote: Now the logic is only quality songs can be radio hits.
-
Brain_of_K
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 6:32 pm
- Location: Glasgow
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
After several listens, i've gotta say that I like it! It's a grower.
Liking it though makes me feel very dirty. Like pissing yourself on a cold winters day....you know it's wrong but it makes you feel warm for a little while.
Liking it though makes me feel very dirty. Like pissing yourself on a cold winters day....you know it's wrong but it makes you feel warm for a little while.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85155
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Absolutely not. You inferred it.IlluminEddie wrote:harmless wrote:Nobody's said that though.IlluminEddie wrote:No, the logic is: anyone who thinks songs are higher quality because they are played less is an idiot.Thejambi wrote: Now the logic is only quality songs can be radio hits.
He "implied it". Once again, go read the full thing in context this time.
There's a massive communication breakdown between you and many others here.
- Heathen
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 3988
- Joined: Wed January 30, 2013 4:30 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
We've all implied it in every single one of our posts. There, you just implied it yourself. And so did I. There's no escaping this.durdencommatyler wrote:I'm just not sure I've seen anyone here making that claim, is all.IlluminEddie wrote:No, the logic is: anyone who thinks songs are higher quality because they are played less is an idiot.Thejambi wrote: Now the logic is only quality songs can be radio hits.
cutuphalfdead wrote:so glad i don't see signatures
-
gems and rhinestones
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 628
- Joined: Sun January 20, 2013 8:02 am
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Wow I just looked up and seen the updated poll for Sirens!
100 to 17
The 40 who are on the fence, stop fighting it. You know you love it!
100 to 17
The 40 who are on the fence, stop fighting it. You know you love it!
- Jaeti
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2642
- Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
What you'll realize, though, is that it's so, so right.Brain_of_K wrote:After several listens, i've gotta say that I like it! It's a grower.
Liking it though makes me feel very dirty. Like pissing yourself on a cold winters day....you know it's wrong but it makes you feel warm for a little while.
- Thejambi
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4301
- Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
- Location: Potato
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Please show me.IlluminEddie wrote:harmless wrote:Nobody's said that though.IlluminEddie wrote:No, the logic is: anyone who thinks songs are higher quality because they are played less is an idiot.Thejambi wrote: Now the logic is only quality songs can be radio hits.
He "implied it". Once again, go read the full thing in context this time.
I like Backspacer more than Riot Act.
I think the songs are higher quality on Riot Act ( technique, craft, depth)
I just happen to enjoy the upbeat and poppy nature of Backspacer in this case.
I can recognize quality even if I don't enjoy the end product that much. I recognize $5 pizzas are trash in comparison to a $15 Hungry Howies pizza but I usually prefer them for the cost/convenience.
Nowhere am I implying any of the nonsense you are saying I am.
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85155
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
I'm gonna go ahead and shock WToB? into oblivion by admitting that we are two different wavelengths this time.cutuphalfdead wrote:I'm so ino everything the IlluminEddie account it's sickening.
- Fuzzcharger
- Jeff's Infallible Pendulum
- Posts: 1919
- Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 2:06 am
- Location: Australia
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Thats some Champagne RM right there.BurtReynolds wrote:what are you implying?harmless wrote:Well you implied a lot of things yourself, so...IlluminEddie wrote:harmless wrote:Nobody's said that though.IlluminEddie wrote:No, the logic is: anyone who thinks songs are higher quality because they are played less is an idiot.Thejambi wrote: Now the logic is only quality songs can be radio hits.
He "implied it". Once again, go read the full thing in context this time.
Lament wrote: Like I always say, "Anyone who thinks getting kicked in the nuts by one person sucks has never gotten kicked in the nuts by two people at the same time."
- Norah
- Poster of the Year
- Posts: 37455
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
- Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
What exactly are you implying here?durdencommatyler wrote:I'm gonna go ahead and shock WToB? into oblivion by admitting that we are two different wavelengths this time.cutuphalfdead wrote:I'm so ino everything the IlluminEddie account it's sickening.
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 85155
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
OH, I see it now! It was hard to see because there wasn't a picture of a cat next to the post.Heathen wrote:We've all implied it in every single one of our posts. There, you just implied it yourself. And so did I. There's no escaping this.durdencommatyler wrote:I'm just not sure I've seen anyone here making that claim, is all.IlluminEddie wrote:No, the logic is: anyone who thinks songs are higher quality because they are played less is an idiot.Thejambi wrote: Now the logic is only quality songs can be radio hits.
- Dr. Van Nostrand
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8898
- Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
is the song even still being talked about? i dont really know whats going on in here anymoreMine wrote:This.....this song has a weird effect on people
-
Brain_of_K
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 6:32 pm
- Location: Glasgow
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
I'm looking forward to drunkenly singing along to this at a gig.Jaeti wrote:What you'll realize, though, is that it's so, so right.Brain_of_K wrote:After several listens, i've gotta say that I like it! It's a grower.
Liking it though makes me feel very dirty. Like pissing yourself on a cold winters day....you know it's wrong but it makes you feel warm for a little while.
Any gig, not necessarily a PJ gig, will do.
- Mine
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Again proves what a hypocrite Ed is.harmless wrote:Meh. Arc is just a tired reworking of Ave Maria.EJ wrote:I love Riot Act. Arc should've been the first single.