BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by McParadigm »

Birds in Hell wrote:"You know what this really needs? More Boom!" - said no Pearl Jam fan ever.
Pearl Jam fans obsess over the quality of digital files, then listen to them with $50 headphones.

Which is why they extoll the clarity of HD listening, then wildly misguess the existence of autotune artifacts and have no idea what you're talking about when you ponder things like the almost cell phone-like ringing behind the last "falling" in each chorus of Long Nights.

Boom's playing is fine. Pearl Jam's ability to incorporate keys in a soft-touch way is not.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

fishbob wrote: :shock: there's Zappa remasters?
Fuck yeah. The entire catalog has been reissued, but these are majorly upgraded remasters....

Absolutely Free
Hot Rats
Burnt Weeny Sandwich
Weasels Ripped My Flesh
Chunga's Revenge
Fillmore East
Just Another Band From L.A.
Waka/Jawaka
Grand Wazoo
Overnite Sensation
Apostrophe
One Size Fits All
Bongo Fury
Zoot Allures
Studio Tan
Sleep Dirt
Sheik Yerbouti
Joe's Garage
Tinsel-town Rebellion
You Are What You Is
Them Or Us

Also, Freak Out and Cruising With Ruben & The Jets have been remastered as deluxe releases. Other titles are probably being withheld for future deluxe releases (Uncle Meat, Zappa In New York).
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by Norah »

Birds in Hell wrote:"You know what this really needs? More Boom!" - said no Pearl Jam fan ever.
truth
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by Norah »

McParadigm wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:"You know what this really needs? More Boom!" - said no Pearl Jam fan ever.
Pearl Jam fans obsess over the quality of digital files, then listen to them with $50 headphones.
Hey, fuck you!
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16264
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by Birds in Hell »

cutuphalfdead wrote:
McParadigm wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:"You know what this really needs? More Boom!" - said no Pearl Jam fan ever.
Pearl Jam fans obsess over the quality of digital files, then listen to them with $50 headphones.
Hey, fuck you!
I know, right?
injuddstree
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 442
Joined: Tue March 12, 2013 10:21 am

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by injuddstree »

He can only work with what he's given.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by Norah »

I have great headphones!
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16264
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by Birds in Hell »

cutuphalfdead wrote:I have great headphones!
I don't even know who he's referring to.
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

My headphones cost $550 and they're made from zebra scrotums.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16264
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by Birds in Hell »

Wendy Carlos's Twin wrote:My headphones cost $550 and they're made with zebra scrotums.
I've found those made from panda scrotums provide a more detailed soundstage but YMMV.
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by Mine »

McParadigm wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:"You know what this really needs? More Boom!" - said no Pearl Jam fan ever.
Pearl Jam fans obsess over the quality of digital files, then listen to them with $50 headphones.

Which is why they extoll the clarity of HD listening, then wildly misguess the existence of autotune artifacts and have no idea what you're talking about when you ponder things like the almost cell phone-like ringing behind the last "falling" in each chorus of Long Nights.

Boom's playing is fine. Pearl Jam's ability to incorporate keys in a soft-touch way is not.
Are 50$ headphones even good enough to distinguish lossy and lossless?
If i understand what you're implying i agree that HD alone doesn't mean much. Mastering still makes the biggest difference IMO.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 24953
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by B »

Birds in Hell wrote:"You know what this really needs? More Boom!" - said no Pearl Jam fan ever.
That's a great strawman. I hope you're sharing your talents with the News & Debate thread.

What if you ask them to choose Boom vs. BO'B on keys?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by harmless »

B wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:"You know what this really needs? More Boom!" - said no Pearl Jam fan ever.
That's a great strawman. I hope you're sharing your talents with the News & Debate thread.

What if you ask them to choose Boom vs. BO'B on keys?
Yup.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16264
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by Birds in Hell »

B wrote:
Birds in Hell wrote:"You know what this really needs? More Boom!" - said no Pearl Jam fan ever.
That's a great strawman. I hope you're sharing your talents with the News & Debate thread.

What if you ask them to choose Boom vs. BO'B on keys?
It was a joke, B.
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16264
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by Birds in Hell »

Steve Albini writing to Nirvana regarding the recording of what would become In Utero.

I'll, uh, just leave this here.

http://musicfeeds.com.au/news/read-stev ... -in-utero/
Steve Albini wrote:I think the very best thing you could do at this point is exactly what you’re talking about doing: bang a record out in a couple of days, with high quality but “minimal” production” and no interference from the front office bulletheads. If that is indeed what you want to do, I would love to be involved.

If instead, you find yourselves in the position of being temporarily indulged by the record company, only to have them yank the chain at some point (hassling you to rework songs/sequences/production, calling-in hired guns to “sweeten” your record, turning the whole thing over to some remix jockey, whatever…) then you’re in for a bummer and I want no part of it.

I’m only interested in working on records that legitimately reflect the band’s own perception of their music and existence. If you will commit yourselves to that as a tenet of the recording methodology, then I will bust my ass for you. I’ll work circles around you. I’ll rap your head in with a ratchet…

I have worked on hundreds of records (some great, some good, some horrible, a lot in the courtyard), and I have seen a direct correlation between the quality of the end result and the mood of the band throughout the process. If the record takes a long time, and everyone gets bummed and scrutinizes eery step, then the recordings bear little resemblance to the live band, and the end result is seldom flattering. Making punk rock records is definitely a cae where more “work” does not imply a netter end result. Clearly you have learned this yourselves and appreciate the logic.

I consider the band the most important thing, as the creative entity that spawned both the band’s personality and style and as the social entity that exists 24 hours out of each day. I do not consider it my place to tell you what to do or how to play. I’m quite willing to let my opinions be heard (if I think the band is making beautiful progress or a heaving mistake I consider it part of my job to tell them) but if the band decides to pursue something I’ll see that it gets done.

I like to leave room for accidents and chaos. Making a seamless record where every note and syllable is in place and every bass drum beat is identical, is no trick. Any idiot with patience and the budget to allow such foolishness can do it. I prefer to work on records that aspire to greater things, like originality, personality and enthusiasm. If every element of the music and dynamics of a band is controlled by click tracks, computers, automated mixes, gates, samplers and sequencers, then the record may not be incompetent, but it certainly won’t be exceptional. It will also bear very little relationship to the live band, which is what all this hooey is supposed to be about.

I do not have afixed gospel of stock sounds and recording techniques that I apply blindly to every band in every situation. You are a different band from any other band and deserve at least the respect of having your own tastes and concerns addressed. For example, I love the sound of a boomy drum kit (say a Gretach or a Camco) wide open in a big room, especially with a Bonhammy double-headed bass drum and a really painful snare drum. I also love the puke-inducing low end that comes of an old Fender Bassman or Ampeg gutiar amp and the totally blown sound of an SVT with broken-in tubes. I also know that those sounds are appropriate for some songs, and trying to force them in is a waste of time. Predicating the recordings on my tastes is as stupid as designing a car around the upholstery. You guys need to decide and then articulate to me what you want to sound like so we don’t come at the record from different directions.

Where we record the record is not as important as how it is recorded. If you have a nice studio you’d like to use, no hag. Otherwise, I can make suggestions. I have a nice 24-track studio in my house (Fugazi were just there, you can ask them how they rate it), and I’m familiar with most of the studios in the Midwest, the East Coast and a dozen or so in the UK. I would be a little concerned about having you at my house for the duration of the whole recording and mixing process (if only because you’re big celebrities, and I wouldn’t want word getting out in the neighborhood and you guys having to put up with a lot of fan-style bullshit); it would be a fine place to mix the record though, and you can’t beat the vicinity.

I explained this to Kurt but I thought I’d better reiterate it here. I do not want to and will not take a royalty on any record I record. No points. Period. I thinking paying a royalty to a producer or engineer is ethically indefensible. The band write the songs. The band play the music.. It’s the band’s fans who buy the records. The band is responsible for whether it’s a great record or a horrible record. Royalties belong to the band.

I would like to be paid like a plumber. I do the job and you pay me what it’s worth. The record company will expect me to ask for a point or a point and a half. If we assume three million sales, that works out to 400,000 dollars or so. There’s no fucking way I would ever take that much money. I wouldn’t be able to sleep.

I have to be comfortable with the amount of money you pay me, but it’s your money, and I insist that you be comfortable with it as well. Kurt suggested paying me a chunk which I would consider full payment, and then if you really thought I deserved more, paying me another chunk after you’d had a chance to live with the album for a while. That would be fine, but probably more organizational trouble than it’s worth.

Whatever, I trust you guys to be fair to me and I know you most be familiar with what a regular industry goon would want. I will let you make the final decision about what I’m going to be paid. How much you choose to pay me will not affect my enthusiasm for the record.

Some people in my position would expect an increase in business after being associated with your band. I, however, already have more work than I can handle, and frankly, the kind of people such superficialities will attract are not people I want to work with. Please don’t consider that an issue.

PS – If a record takes more than a week to make, somebody’s fucking up.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36490
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by Jorge »

That reads like the OkCupid profile of someone who has vastly overestimated their pull.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
LetMeSleep
Posting (live)
Posts: 17987
Joined: Wed February 06, 2013 2:47 am
Twitter: https://twitter.com/
Location: Scooby Doo

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by LetMeSleep »

While we're on SA here's a great scenario of an independent band.

http://www.negativland.com/news/?page_id=17
User avatar
Lament
Commissioner
Posts: 11792
Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by Lament »

theplatypus wrote:That reads like the OkCupid profile of someone who has vastly overestimated their pull.
Who showed you my OKCupid profile? Dammit...
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by bodysnatcher »

i placed this in the Nirvana thread too, but thought it was an interesting point of view from a producer (read: the Anti Brendan O'Brien)

http://www.buzzfeed.com/danmartin/this- ... incredible

edit: nevermind, just saw it posted above
Last edited by bodysnatcher on Fri September 27, 2013 8:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: BOB vitriol / scape goat thread

Post by EJ »

Birds in Hell wrote:Steve Albini writing to Nirvana regarding the recording of what would become In Utero.

I'll, uh, just leave this here.

http://musicfeeds.com.au/news/read-stev ... -in-utero/
Steve Albini wrote:I think the very best thing you could do at this point is exactly what you’re talking about doing: bang a record out in a couple of days, with high quality but “minimal” production” and no interference from the front office bulletheads. If that is indeed what you want to do, I would love to be involved.

If instead, you find yourselves in the position of being temporarily indulged by the record company, only to have them yank the chain at some point (hassling you to rework songs/sequences/production, calling-in hired guns to “sweeten” your record, turning the whole thing over to some remix jockey, whatever…) then you’re in for a bummer and I want no part of it.

I’m only interested in working on records that legitimately reflect the band’s own perception of their music and existence. If you will commit yourselves to that as a tenet of the recording methodology, then I will bust my ass for you. I’ll work circles around you. I’ll rap your head in with a ratchet…

I have worked on hundreds of records (some great, some good, some horrible, a lot in the courtyard), and I have seen a direct correlation between the quality of the end result and the mood of the band throughout the process. If the record takes a long time, and everyone gets bummed and scrutinizes eery step, then the recordings bear little resemblance to the live band, and the end result is seldom flattering. Making punk rock records is definitely a cae where more “work” does not imply a netter end result. Clearly you have learned this yourselves and appreciate the logic.

I consider the band the most important thing, as the creative entity that spawned both the band’s personality and style and as the social entity that exists 24 hours out of each day. I do not consider it my place to tell you what to do or how to play. I’m quite willing to let my opinions be heard (if I think the band is making beautiful progress or a heaving mistake I consider it part of my job to tell them) but if the band decides to pursue something I’ll see that it gets done.

I like to leave room for accidents and chaos. Making a seamless record where every note and syllable is in place and every bass drum beat is identical, is no trick. Any idiot with patience and the budget to allow such foolishness can do it. I prefer to work on records that aspire to greater things, like originality, personality and enthusiasm. If every element of the music and dynamics of a band is controlled by click tracks, computers, automated mixes, gates, samplers and sequencers, then the record may not be incompetent, but it certainly won’t be exceptional. It will also bear very little relationship to the live band, which is what all this hooey is supposed to be about.

I do not have afixed gospel of stock sounds and recording techniques that I apply blindly to every band in every situation. You are a different band from any other band and deserve at least the respect of having your own tastes and concerns addressed. For example, I love the sound of a boomy drum kit (say a Gretach or a Camco) wide open in a big room, especially with a Bonhammy double-headed bass drum and a really painful snare drum. I also love the puke-inducing low end that comes of an old Fender Bassman or Ampeg gutiar amp and the totally blown sound of an SVT with broken-in tubes. I also know that those sounds are appropriate for some songs, and trying to force them in is a waste of time. Predicating the recordings on my tastes is as stupid as designing a car around the upholstery. You guys need to decide and then articulate to me what you want to sound like so we don’t come at the record from different directions.

Where we record the record is not as important as how it is recorded. If you have a nice studio you’d like to use, no hag. Otherwise, I can make suggestions. I have a nice 24-track studio in my house (Fugazi were just there, you can ask them how they rate it), and I’m familiar with most of the studios in the Midwest, the East Coast and a dozen or so in the UK. I would be a little concerned about having you at my house for the duration of the whole recording and mixing process (if only because you’re big celebrities, and I wouldn’t want word getting out in the neighborhood and you guys having to put up with a lot of fan-style bullshit); it would be a fine place to mix the record though, and you can’t beat the vicinity.

I explained this to Kurt but I thought I’d better reiterate it here. I do not want to and will not take a royalty on any record I record. No points. Period. I thinking paying a royalty to a producer or engineer is ethically indefensible. The band write the songs. The band play the music.. It’s the band’s fans who buy the records. The band is responsible for whether it’s a great record or a horrible record. Royalties belong to the band.

I would like to be paid like a plumber. I do the job and you pay me what it’s worth. The record company will expect me to ask for a point or a point and a half. If we assume three million sales, that works out to 400,000 dollars or so. There’s no fucking way I would ever take that much money. I wouldn’t be able to sleep.

I have to be comfortable with the amount of money you pay me, but it’s your money, and I insist that you be comfortable with it as well. Kurt suggested paying me a chunk which I would consider full payment, and then if you really thought I deserved more, paying me another chunk after you’d had a chance to live with the album for a while. That would be fine, but probably more organizational trouble than it’s worth.

Whatever, I trust you guys to be fair to me and I know you most be familiar with what a regular industry goon would want. I will let you make the final decision about what I’m going to be paid. How much you choose to pay me will not affect my enthusiasm for the record.

Some people in my position would expect an increase in business after being associated with your band. I, however, already have more work than I can handle, and frankly, the kind of people such superficialities will attract are not people I want to work with. Please don’t consider that an issue.

PS – If a record takes more than a week to make, somebody’s fucking up.
I enjoyed that, thanks.
Post Reply