30th Anniversary of Ten

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply
User avatar
UglyRedHonda
A Return To Form
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 8:21 pm

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by UglyRedHonda »

B wrote:Why was that even a thing? Did they fit better into bins made for records? No wait, we were buying cassettes before that, weren't we?
The major labels were actively trying to kill vinyl in the late 80s / early 90s - so it was a way to save costs for record stores (and encourage the replacement) while not making them upgrade their shelves.

It was mainly the cardboard longbox, but a few labels used plastic clamshells that had the CD booklet up top and the CD case down below. The cardboard longbox sometimes itself was just a generic cardboard box with a window cut out so you could see the front and back of the disc, especially for older catalog re-issues.

A handful of bands (read: R.E.M.) complained about the waste. There was a brief period where they made CD cases that would fold down or transform from a longbox shape to a standard CD case after you opened it. (The first Vs. pressings came in one of those, though I only ever saw copies that were sealed in their CD case shape.)

The majors (mostly) eliminated all of that by the end of 1993. The hard plastic ones that stores used later did the same thing in a reusable way, but some of them came with the bonus of having embedded security tags.

I still have my longboxes from that era. I kept thinking I might frame some of them, since the artwork is often different and interesting, but they're usually nowhere near as cool as the vinyl artwork.


Btw - the bane of the 90s was the "tamper-proof" holographic sticker on the opening side of the CD case that you couldn't really remove without leaving the holographic gunk side of the sticker behind. (The copies of Vs. I bought on release day had the eco-pack and that fucking sticker.)
User avatar
Sgt. Crackpot
F.U.B.A.R
Posts: 9104
Joined: Wed July 03, 2013 11:21 pm
Twitter: RobertDowneyJr
Location: Lft Craquepeau
Contact:

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by Sgt. Crackpot »

That's awesome, I had no idea of those. Thanks for the insight.
Rangi Guy wrote:So skating back to the train station after work today things went wrong.....now my skateboard is at the bottom of the harbour :(
User avatar
Wendy Carlos's Twin
Future Drummer
Posts: 2809
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 9:37 am

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by Wendy Carlos's Twin »

liebzz wrote:If I remember correctly, these cardboard box things came first as additional packaging.
Not quite. The first retail CD holders were plastic clamshell things that held the booklet at the top for display purposes and the CD case would be at the bottom. When you opened them they would tear and the edges would be dangerously sharp and you could cut somebody with it.

Then they started getting fancy (circa 1990) and making cardboard holders that would either have the album art (like Ten above) or would be a generic "record company" placeholder thing with the album cover visible through a hole in the cardboard.

Then they did away with those in the mid-90's and record stores started investing in plastic holders that had to be opened with a key so that people couldn't steal shit.

Then a short while after that, they did away with the holders altogether and just started putting annoying security thingies on them, which is how it still is today, I guess.
User avatar
Buby
Future Drummer
Posts: 2783
Joined: Fri January 04, 2013 9:08 pm
Location: West of Deedle

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by Buby »

B wrote:
liebzz wrote:I hope they instead release a 25th anniversary edition of No Code.
Me too, but no chance.
This.
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10375
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by liebzz »

Buby wrote:
B wrote:
liebzz wrote:I hope they instead release a 25th anniversary edition of No Code.
Me too, but no chance.
This.
I mean, we have a hundred different versions and a full reissue of Ten already. For No Code, we just have a repressing. At least give us a new album packaging with a photo of Jeff Ament’s reaction to learning that they had already starting recording this before he was notified to be there.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by VinylGuy »

cant believe they actually did that
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10375
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by liebzz »

VinylGuy wrote:cant believe they actually did that
What’s weird about it is that the aesthetic of the album to me would seem to appeal to Jeff Ament. Some off kilter timings, eastern influences juxtaposed against outright hard punk rock, blues inflections and spoken word. Switching instruments and vocalists. This is the sort of stuff I would thing he’d be 100% into.
User avatar
wease
Major Dude
Posts: 40177
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 1:57 pm
Location: Where everybody knows your name

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by wease »

liebzz wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:cant believe they actually did that
What’s weird about it is that the aesthetic of the album to me would seem to appeal to Jeff Ament. Some off kilter timings, eastern influences juxtaposed against outright hard punk rock, blues inflections and spoken word. Switching instruments and vocalists. This is the sort of stuff I would thing he’d be 100% into.
Sure. As long as he’s part of it.
Let me tell you, Homer Simpson is cock of nothing!
- C. Montgomery Burns
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by VinylGuy »

liebzz wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:cant believe they actually did that
What’s weird about it is that the aesthetic of the album to me would seem to appeal to Jeff Ament. Some off kilter timings, eastern influences juxtaposed against outright hard punk rock, blues inflections and spoken word. Switching instruments and vocalists. This is the sort of stuff I would thing he’d be 100% into.
yeah, but it seems they didnt wanted him to know. Its so bizarre.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
User avatar
Strat
Waiting for HVAC Repairman
Posts: 35407
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
Location: Twin City Kisses

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by Strat »

I dont think " they " did anything.

Didn't jeff basically admit that he checked out and just fucked off to Montana to get away from it all and didnt bother checking in?
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 42772
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by VinylGuy »

still, they could have called him.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
warehouse
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4993
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by warehouse »

eddie vedder didn't want to wait for anyone to start 'no code'. that's why 'yield' has the title it does, he waited for everyone on the next album.
User avatar
Biff Pocoroba
TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
Posts: 4801
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm
Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by Biff Pocoroba »

January 8th was the 30th anniversary of Jeremy Delle’s suicide.
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by McParadigm »

Didn’t Jeff not know they were recording No Code for all of three days? Most the album is full of room leak. It’s not like they cut side b and then invited him in to add basslines.
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by bodysnatcher »

To be honest, all Jeff missed was Ed and Stone bitching at each other for a few days
User avatar
Birds in Hell
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 16264
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by Birds in Hell »

Yeah, it's never sounded like a big thing.

I don't get the sense they were deliberately recording without Jeff; instead he was willingly 'out of the loop' (more or less) at the time, they'd started getting a few initial ideas together in his absence, and he ended up arriving within a few days anyway.
User avatar
Leatherhead
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4281
Joined: Fri August 09, 2013 4:38 am

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by Leatherhead »

bodysnatcher wrote:To be honest, all Jeff missed was Ed and Stone bitching at each other for a few days
I liked this one.
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23453
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by Anders »

The songs were mostly written in the summer of 1990, first recorded together with Ed in October that year. But the actual recording of Ten is from 27th of March 1991 to the 26th of April 1991.
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10375
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by liebzz »

Tomorrow is 30 years since Temple of the Dog was released. I still wish they’d release a show from the reunion tour to celebrate.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51788
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: 30th Anniversary of Ten

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

liebzz wrote:Tomorrow is 30 years since Temple of the Dog was released. I still wish they’d release a show from the reunion tour to celebrate.
Same. Preferably the one i was at but I’ll take any
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
Post Reply