Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

[simple schoolboy]

Oh goodness, incitement has a particular legal definition?

[knee tunes]

Oh goodness, incitement has a particular legal definition?

Are you trying to be a dick, or is just by accident?

[simple schoolboy]

Oh goodness, incitement has a particular legal definition?

Are you trying to be a dick, or is just by accident?

The correct response is that "high crimes and misdemeanors" are whatever the legislative branch determines it to be.

Using legal terms like "Incitement" just confuses things.

[knee tunes]

Oh goodness, incitement has a particular legal definition?

Are you trying to be a dick, or is just by accident?

The correct response is that "high crimes and misdemeanors" are whatever the legislative branch determines it to be.

Using legal terms like "Incitement" just confuses things.

I'm tickled that there's intelligent life in this thread and i know, I spelled " 'high crimes and misdemeanors' are whatever the legislative branch determines it to be " wrong. I'm sorry

[dimejinky99]

He isn’t going to be held to account. Why are they going through with this charade?

[spike]

He isn’t going to be held to account. Why are they going through with this charade?

get it on record, set precedent. so it doesn't happen again, or if it does, they can take it further.

[96583UP]

and cause it’s the right thing to do

[96583UP]

and to embarrass the GOP

[BurtReynolds]

[BurtReynolds]

and cause it’s the right thing to do

The right thing to do is to resign en masse.

[spike]

what a fool

[simple schoolboy]

Is this one of those accounts that uncritically retweets Laurence Tribe and Tom Nichols?

[Higgs]

He isn’t going to be held to account. Why are they going through with this charade?

get it on record, set precedent. so it doesn't happen again, or if it does, they can take it further.

Yeah, given that this is really just a political vote as compared to any sort of trial, what really is the point though?

The only precedent at play here is that senators will vote with their party. That was set a looooong time ago. Not one single senator will change the way they vote on this because of any of the arguments being put forward. Trump could have not had lawyers at all and had an empty lectern sitting there and it still wouldn't have made a tiny bit of difference.

Total waste of time. Bring on the Georgia criminal investigation though. That could actually be worth something.

[verb_to_trust]

Bring on the Georgia criminal investigation though. That could actually be worth something.

Lol no

[BurtReynolds]

As trump has not officially conceded, I now declare myself the winner of the trump concession date contest.

[The Argonaut]

As trump has not officially conceded, I now declare myself the winner of the trump concession date contest.

i already wont that

[elliseamos]

As trump has not officially conceded, I now declare myself the winner of the trump concession date contest.

i already wont that

He left DC on inauguration day, signaling to me that I was a winner and he loved me.

[wease]

As trump has not officially conceded, I now declare myself the winner of the trump concession date contest.

i already wont that

He left DC on inauguration day, signaling to me that I was a winner and he loved me.

Wease won it long before any of you hosers had any sort of claim to it.

[elliseamos]

As trump has not officially conceded, I now declare myself the winner of the trump concession date contest.

i already wont that

He left DC on inauguration day, signaling to me that I was a winner and he loved me.

Wease won it long before any of you hosers had any sort of claim to it.

I don't believe this for a second.

[Rob]

Total waste of time.

It's not a waste of time. Trump is now the first president to be impeached twice. And this will provide a good summary of what happened, while getting these people on record on where they stand. Congress wastes time all year, at least they're doing something now.