Well put. The both of you.harmless wrote:Pretty much. And that's the new context against which I try to appreciate them here and there. They're always going to be part of what makes me me, for good or ill. I don't see myself ever putting them down, even if it makes me an angry, bitter old man for what they've become.darth_vedder wrote:I can see this. The road they seemed to be heading down through RA was the band I raved on and on about. How "misunderstood" they were, and how no one (outside of PJ Land) knows the really good stuff like No Code and Yield, just Ten. Songs like The Fixer and Sirens certainly make it hard to think this is the same band. I don't know how to quite articulate, but it seems they were walking down a Neil Young and Sonic Youth road, but they turned down another road and went more U2 and Rolling Stones.harmless wrote:The difficulty with this song is about much more than this song. For some, it's part of a long line of disappointing aspects of the new Pearl Jam who are a different band than the one they signed up for. I can't take that away from anyone, and I feel it to some extent myself.
Song of the Moment: Sirens
-
15showsandcounting
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Mon February 11, 2013 6:09 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
The thing is, though, we'll still be able to argue people don't know the good stuff. We can still proudly show people No Code, Yield, Binaural and Riot Act... people who have loved Sirens or hated Sirens and want to see the other side. We still have that.15showsandcounting wrote:Well put. The both of you.harmless wrote:Pretty much. And that's the new context against which I try to appreciate them here and there. They're always going to be part of what makes me me, for good or ill. I don't see myself ever putting them down, even if it makes me an angry, bitter old man for what they've become.darth_vedder wrote:I can see this. The road they seemed to be heading down through RA was the band I raved on and on about. How "misunderstood" they were, and how no one (outside of PJ Land) knows the really good stuff like No Code and Yield, just Ten. Songs like The Fixer and Sirens certainly make it hard to think this is the same band. I don't know how to quite articulate, but it seems they were walking down a Neil Young and Sonic Youth road, but they turned down another road and went more U2 and Rolling Stones.harmless wrote:The difficulty with this song is about much more than this song. For some, it's part of a long line of disappointing aspects of the new Pearl Jam who are a different band than the one they signed up for. I can't take that away from anyone, and I feel it to some extent myself.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
-
liebzz
- I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
- Posts: 10616
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Keep calm. They haven't exactly broken Miley Cyrus's record on video views with Sirens...yet. 
- WaitingForBluey
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2647
- Joined: Thu March 21, 2013 1:08 am
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/homeforbed
- Location: Pennsyltucky
- Contact:
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Forgive me for my lack of brevity here....
But it appears to me that I am moving in the exact opposite direction from most of the people on this board. I feel like I was a PJ apologist pretty much from the beginning. For every Small Town and Betterman the band released, my discomfort with being a PJ fan grew by leaps and bounds. It was slowly apparent to me that PJ would never have the type of "indie-credibility" (as in anything the "cool" hipsters would accept into their little club of "all that which does not suck") that bands like Nirvana and Radiohead had, and probably will always have. For some reason, that's all I really wanted for the band.
Back then I was more of an indie/punk/hardcore/emo kid than an alternative/mainstream/classic rock fan. My friends and I listened to a lot of Fugazi, Sonic Youth, Pixies and stuff like that. Some of my friends appreciated Ten and maybe Vs, but the by the time Vitalogy came out I was made to be ashamed of my loyalty to PJ. I started to sneak it in whenever I could. With every new Pearl Jam album, probably all the way through S/T, I would look for signs that PJ was weird enough or experimental enough or whatever to gain that elusive "indie-credibility" status. There's no doubt that my mindset tainted my first listening experience with every single album from Vitalogy to S/T. Why the fuck should I care if Pitchfork gave a new Pearl Jam album a positive review? I don't know. But for some stupid reason I did care. The indie hipster in me just couldn't let Pearl Jam be Pearl Jam.
By the time Backspacer started to arrive, something started to shift though. I started to think "who gives a shit if people don't like this? I'm totally cool with this." Maybe it was me just growing up and getting older, or my taste in music was changing rapidly (listening to alt-country, funk, reggae, afrobeat and on and on), or I just didn't have the energy to apologize for Pearl Jam anymore. But as soon as I heard Sirens it was a total confirmation for me. Like a huge declaration. I feel a great sense of relief now. Sirens was the nail in the coffin that took that old way of thinking and laid it down to rest for good. Now I could care less what people think of PJ and what the reviews will say about Lightning Bolt because PJ is still just doing their thing and I dig it and that's enough me. No longer uncomfortable to be a Pearl Jam fan after 20 years.
But it appears to me that I am moving in the exact opposite direction from most of the people on this board. I feel like I was a PJ apologist pretty much from the beginning. For every Small Town and Betterman the band released, my discomfort with being a PJ fan grew by leaps and bounds. It was slowly apparent to me that PJ would never have the type of "indie-credibility" (as in anything the "cool" hipsters would accept into their little club of "all that which does not suck") that bands like Nirvana and Radiohead had, and probably will always have. For some reason, that's all I really wanted for the band.
Back then I was more of an indie/punk/hardcore/emo kid than an alternative/mainstream/classic rock fan. My friends and I listened to a lot of Fugazi, Sonic Youth, Pixies and stuff like that. Some of my friends appreciated Ten and maybe Vs, but the by the time Vitalogy came out I was made to be ashamed of my loyalty to PJ. I started to sneak it in whenever I could. With every new Pearl Jam album, probably all the way through S/T, I would look for signs that PJ was weird enough or experimental enough or whatever to gain that elusive "indie-credibility" status. There's no doubt that my mindset tainted my first listening experience with every single album from Vitalogy to S/T. Why the fuck should I care if Pitchfork gave a new Pearl Jam album a positive review? I don't know. But for some stupid reason I did care. The indie hipster in me just couldn't let Pearl Jam be Pearl Jam.
By the time Backspacer started to arrive, something started to shift though. I started to think "who gives a shit if people don't like this? I'm totally cool with this." Maybe it was me just growing up and getting older, or my taste in music was changing rapidly (listening to alt-country, funk, reggae, afrobeat and on and on), or I just didn't have the energy to apologize for Pearl Jam anymore. But as soon as I heard Sirens it was a total confirmation for me. Like a huge declaration. I feel a great sense of relief now. Sirens was the nail in the coffin that took that old way of thinking and laid it down to rest for good. Now I could care less what people think of PJ and what the reviews will say about Lightning Bolt because PJ is still just doing their thing and I dig it and that's enough me. No longer uncomfortable to be a Pearl Jam fan after 20 years.
theplatypus wrote:A solo is when the guitar goes twiddly diddly
- Lounge Lizard
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1843
- Joined: Tue July 23, 2013 6:51 am
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Stone is always like 'Pfff! Sure, put HIM five steps in front of the rest of us'Lament wrote:broken iris wrote:Point me to a band that hasn't had at least one single worse than this song, much less at 23 years into their career.

- Lament
- Commissioner
- Posts: 11792
- Joined: Wed March 13, 2013 12:48 am
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
When Stone woke up that morning and realized it was album promo shot day, he went into his closest and made sure to pull out his best zip up sweater with reindeers on it. He wanted it to be special. So I can understand why he's upset about Ed being so far up front. He was really proud of that sweater.Lounge Lizard wrote:Stone is always like 'Pfff! Sure, put HIM five steps in front of the rest of us'Lament wrote:broken iris wrote:Point me to a band that hasn't had at least one single worse than this song, much less at 23 years into their career.
TEAM HARMLESS FOREVER...
-
warehouse
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
20 years?!?! its about fucking time. what did all your nerdy hipster friends think of kurt cobain doing mtv stuff all the time? lol @ indie cred.bluestate wrote:Forgive me for my lack of brevity here....
But it appears to me that I am moving in the exact opposite direction from most of the people on this board. I feel like I was a PJ apologist pretty much from the beginning. For every Small Town and Betterman the band released, my discomfort with being a PJ fan grew by leaps and bounds. It was slowly apparent to me that PJ would never have the type of "indie-credibility" (as in anything the "cool" hipsters would accept into their little club of "all that which does not suck") that bands like Nirvana and Radiohead had, and probably will always have. For some reason, that's all I really wanted for the band.
Back then I was more of an indie/punk/hardcore/emo kid than an alternative/mainstream/classic rock fan. My friends and I listened to a lot of Fugazi, Sonic Youth, Pixies and stuff like that. Some of my friends appreciated Ten and maybe Vs, but the by the time Vitalogy came out I was made to be ashamed of my loyalty to PJ. I started to sneak it in whenever I could. With every new Pearl Jam album, probably all the way through S/T, I would look for signs that PJ was weird enough or experimental enough or whatever to gain that elusive "indie-credibility" status. There's no doubt that my mindset tainted my first listening experience with every single album from Vitalogy to S/T. Why the fuck should I care if Pitchfork gave a new Pearl Jam album a positive review? I don't know. But for some stupid reason I did care. The indie hipster in me just couldn't let Pearl Jam be Pearl Jam.
By the time Backspacer started to arrive, something started to shift though. I started to think "who gives a shit if people don't like this? I'm totally cool with this." Maybe it was me just growing up and getting older, or my taste in music was changing rapidly (listening to alt-country, funk, reggae, afrobeat and on and on), or I just didn't have the energy to apologize for Pearl Jam anymore. But as soon as I heard Sirens it was a total confirmation for me. Like a huge declaration. I feel a great sense of relief now. Sirens was the nail in the coffin that took that old way of thinking and laid it down to rest for good. Now I could care less what people think of PJ and what the reviews will say about Lightning Bolt because PJ is still just doing their thing and I dig it and that's enough me. No longer uncomfortable to be a Pearl Jam fan after 20 years.
- Jaeti
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2642
- Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Solid, solid post.bluestate wrote:Forgive me for my lack of brevity here....
But it appears to me that I am moving in the exact opposite direction from most of the people on this board. I feel like I was a PJ apologist pretty much from the beginning. For every Small Town and Betterman the band released, my discomfort with being a PJ fan grew by leaps and bounds. It was slowly apparent to me that PJ would never have the type of "indie-credibility" (as in anything the "cool" hipsters would accept into their little club of "all that which does not suck") that bands like Nirvana and Radiohead had, and probably will always have. For some reason, that's all I really wanted for the band.
Back then I was more of an indie/punk/hardcore/emo kid than an alternative/mainstream/classic rock fan. My friends and I listened to a lot of Fugazi, Sonic Youth, Pixies and stuff like that. Some of my friends appreciated Ten and maybe Vs, but the by the time Vitalogy came out I was made to be ashamed of my loyalty to PJ. I started to sneak it in whenever I could. With every new Pearl Jam album, probably all the way through S/T, I would look for signs that PJ was weird enough or experimental enough or whatever to gain that elusive "indie-credibility" status. There's no doubt that my mindset tainted my first listening experience with every single album from Vitalogy to S/T. Why the fuck should I care if Pitchfork gave a new Pearl Jam album a positive review? I don't know. But for some stupid reason I did care. The indie hipster in me just couldn't let Pearl Jam be Pearl Jam.
By the time Backspacer started to arrive, something started to shift though. I started to think "who gives a shit if people don't like this? I'm totally cool with this." Maybe it was me just growing up and getting older, or my taste in music was changing rapidly (listening to alt-country, funk, reggae, afrobeat and on and on), or I just didn't have the energy to apologize for Pearl Jam anymore. But as soon as I heard Sirens it was a total confirmation for me. Like a huge declaration. I feel a great sense of relief now. Sirens was the nail in the coffin that took that old way of thinking and laid it down to rest for good. Now I could care less what people think of PJ and what the reviews will say about Lightning Bolt because PJ is still just doing their thing and I dig it and that's enough me. No longer uncomfortable to be a Pearl Jam fan after 20 years.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46239
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
yes congrats on your freedom to like music no matter how lame it is.Jaeti wrote:Solid, solid post.bluestate wrote:Forgive me for my lack of brevity here....
But it appears to me that I am moving in the exact opposite direction from most of the people on this board. I feel like I was a PJ apologist pretty much from the beginning. For every Small Town and Betterman the band released, my discomfort with being a PJ fan grew by leaps and bounds. It was slowly apparent to me that PJ would never have the type of "indie-credibility" (as in anything the "cool" hipsters would accept into their little club of "all that which does not suck") that bands like Nirvana and Radiohead had, and probably will always have. For some reason, that's all I really wanted for the band.
Back then I was more of an indie/punk/hardcore/emo kid than an alternative/mainstream/classic rock fan. My friends and I listened to a lot of Fugazi, Sonic Youth, Pixies and stuff like that. Some of my friends appreciated Ten and maybe Vs, but the by the time Vitalogy came out I was made to be ashamed of my loyalty to PJ. I started to sneak it in whenever I could. With every new Pearl Jam album, probably all the way through S/T, I would look for signs that PJ was weird enough or experimental enough or whatever to gain that elusive "indie-credibility" status. There's no doubt that my mindset tainted my first listening experience with every single album from Vitalogy to S/T. Why the fuck should I care if Pitchfork gave a new Pearl Jam album a positive review? I don't know. But for some stupid reason I did care. The indie hipster in me just couldn't let Pearl Jam be Pearl Jam.
By the time Backspacer started to arrive, something started to shift though. I started to think "who gives a shit if people don't like this? I'm totally cool with this." Maybe it was me just growing up and getting older, or my taste in music was changing rapidly (listening to alt-country, funk, reggae, afrobeat and on and on), or I just didn't have the energy to apologize for Pearl Jam anymore. But as soon as I heard Sirens it was a total confirmation for me. Like a huge declaration. I feel a great sense of relief now. Sirens was the nail in the coffin that took that old way of thinking and laid it down to rest for good. Now I could care less what people think of PJ and what the reviews will say about Lightning Bolt because PJ is still just doing their thing and I dig it and that's enough me. No longer uncomfortable to be a Pearl Jam fan after 20 years.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
-
warehouse
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
BurtReynolds wrote:yes congrats on your freedom to like music no matter how lame it is.Jaeti wrote:Solid, solid post.bluestate wrote:Forgive me for my lack of brevity here....
But it appears to me that I am moving in the exact opposite direction from most of the people on this board. I feel like I was a PJ apologist pretty much from the beginning. For every Small Town and Betterman the band released, my discomfort with being a PJ fan grew by leaps and bounds. It was slowly apparent to me that PJ would never have the type of "indie-credibility" (as in anything the "cool" hipsters would accept into their little club of "all that which does not suck") that bands like Nirvana and Radiohead had, and probably will always have. For some reason, that's all I really wanted for the band.
Back then I was more of an indie/punk/hardcore/emo kid than an alternative/mainstream/classic rock fan. My friends and I listened to a lot of Fugazi, Sonic Youth, Pixies and stuff like that. Some of my friends appreciated Ten and maybe Vs, but the by the time Vitalogy came out I was made to be ashamed of my loyalty to PJ. I started to sneak it in whenever I could. With every new Pearl Jam album, probably all the way through S/T, I would look for signs that PJ was weird enough or experimental enough or whatever to gain that elusive "indie-credibility" status. There's no doubt that my mindset tainted my first listening experience with every single album from Vitalogy to S/T. Why the fuck should I care if Pitchfork gave a new Pearl Jam album a positive review? I don't know. But for some stupid reason I did care. The indie hipster in me just couldn't let Pearl Jam be Pearl Jam.
By the time Backspacer started to arrive, something started to shift though. I started to think "who gives a shit if people don't like this? I'm totally cool with this." Maybe it was me just growing up and getting older, or my taste in music was changing rapidly (listening to alt-country, funk, reggae, afrobeat and on and on), or I just didn't have the energy to apologize for Pearl Jam anymore. But as soon as I heard Sirens it was a total confirmation for me. Like a huge declaration. I feel a great sense of relief now. Sirens was the nail in the coffin that took that old way of thinking and laid it down to rest for good. Now I could care less what people think of PJ and what the reviews will say about Lightning Bolt because PJ is still just doing their thing and I dig it and that's enough me. No longer uncomfortable to be a Pearl Jam fan after 20 years.
- Lounge Lizard
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1843
- Joined: Tue July 23, 2013 6:51 am
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Plaid flannel always winsLament wrote:When Stone woke up that morning and realized it was album promo shot day, he went into his closest and made sure to pull out his best zip up sweater with reindeers on it. He wanted it to be special. So I can understand why he's upset about Ed being so far up front. He was really proud of that sweater.Lounge Lizard wrote:Stone is always like 'Pfff! Sure, put HIM five steps in front of the rest of us'Lament wrote:broken iris wrote:Point me to a band that hasn't had at least one single worse than this song, much less at 23 years into their career.

- Lounge Lizard
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1843
- Joined: Tue July 23, 2013 6:51 am
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Just how lame is it that when people ask each other about their favorite bands you go 'COUGH pearljam COUGH' and then change the subject in a hurrywarehouse wrote:BurtReynolds wrote: yes congrats on your freedom to like music no matter how lame it is.

- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46239
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
That ended for me with The Fixer. It was very freeing to finally be able to say "Mogwai".Lounge Lizard wrote:Just how lame is it that when people ask each other about their favorite bands you go 'COUGH pearljam COUGH' and then change the subject in a hurrywarehouse wrote:BurtReynolds wrote: yes congrats on your freedom to like music no matter how lame it is.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
- WaitingForBluey
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2647
- Joined: Thu March 21, 2013 1:08 am
- Twitter: https://twitter.com/homeforbed
- Location: Pennsyltucky
- Contact:
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Lounge Lizard wrote:Just how lame is it that when people ask each other about their favorite bands you go 'COUGH pearljam COUGH' and then change the subject in a hurrywarehouse wrote:BurtReynolds wrote: yes congrats on your freedom to like music no matter how lame it is.
No, I say "hey you know what, I'm kind of a dork and all so I love Pearl Jam"
Ah yes, the freedom to be uncool.
theplatypus wrote:A solo is when the guitar goes twiddly diddly
- Lounge Lizard
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1843
- Joined: Tue July 23, 2013 6:51 am
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Yeah, but remember '95-96 when you said 'PEARL JAM MAAAAAN!' and they were like 'Yeeeeeahhhh baby!'BurtReynolds wrote:That ended for me with The Fixer. It was very freeing to finally be able to say "Mogwai".Lounge Lizard wrote:Just how lame is it that when people ask each other about their favorite bands you go 'COUGH pearljam COUGH' and then change the subject in a hurrywarehouse wrote:BurtReynolds wrote: yes congrats on your freedom to like music no matter how lame it is.

-
warehouse
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
the strange thing is, pearl jam was cool this entire time until whenever backspacer came out.bluestate wrote:Lounge Lizard wrote:Just how lame is it that when people ask each other about their favorite bands you go 'COUGH pearljam COUGH' and then change the subject in a hurrywarehouse wrote:BurtReynolds wrote: yes congrats on your freedom to like music no matter how lame it is.![]()
No, I say "hey you know what, I'm kind of a dork and all so I love Pearl Jam"
Ah yes, the freedom to be uncool.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Not really.warehouse wrote:the strange thing is, pearl jam was cool this entire time until whenever backspacer came out.bluestate wrote:Lounge Lizard wrote:Just how lame is it that when people ask each other about their favorite bands you go 'COUGH pearljam COUGH' and then change the subject in a hurrywarehouse wrote:BurtReynolds wrote: yes congrats on your freedom to like music no matter how lame it is.![]()
No, I say "hey you know what, I'm kind of a dork and all so I love Pearl Jam"
Ah yes, the freedom to be uncool.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- Lounge Lizard
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1843
- Joined: Tue July 23, 2013 6:51 am
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Really?warehouse wrote:the strange thing is, pearl jam was cool this entire time until whenever backspacer came out.bluestate wrote:Lounge Lizard wrote:Just how lame is it that when people ask each other about their favorite bands you go 'COUGH pearljam COUGH' and then change the subject in a hurrywarehouse wrote:BurtReynolds wrote: yes congrats on your freedom to like music no matter how lame it is.![]()
No, I say "hey you know what, I'm kind of a dork and all so I love Pearl Jam"
Ah yes, the freedom to be uncool.
Nah... I think it pretty much ended right after No Code and even Yield was regarded as a failed attempt to regain some ground, and it went steadily downhill since.

-
warehouse
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
their mainstream popularity went downhill after no code, but thats not really what im talking about. from vitalogy to binaural they released 4 albums, one every 2 years, each with different feel to it. they've always written "pearl jam" type songs, but their catalog is more diverse than most hipsters will admit.Lounge Lizard wrote:Really?warehouse wrote:the strange thing is, pearl jam was cool this entire time until whenever backspacer came out.bluestate wrote:Lounge Lizard wrote:Just how lame is it that when people ask each other about their favorite bands you go 'COUGH pearljam COUGH' and then change the subject in a hurrywarehouse wrote:BurtReynolds wrote: yes congrats on your freedom to like music no matter how lame it is.![]()
No, I say "hey you know what, I'm kind of a dork and all so I love Pearl Jam"
Ah yes, the freedom to be uncool.
Nah... I think it pretty much ended right after No Code and even Yield was regarded as failed attempt to regain some ground, and it went steadily downhill since.
-
warehouse
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4993
- Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 3:34 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
arent u the guy who doesnt like pink floyd?harmless wrote:Not really.warehouse wrote:the strange thing is, pearl jam was cool this entire time until whenever backspacer came out.bluestate wrote:Lounge Lizard wrote:Just how lame is it that when people ask each other about their favorite bands you go 'COUGH pearljam COUGH' and then change the subject in a hurrywarehouse wrote:BurtReynolds wrote: yes congrats on your freedom to like music no matter how lame it is.![]()
No, I say "hey you know what, I'm kind of a dork and all so I love Pearl Jam"
Ah yes, the freedom to be uncool.
