Re: The 47th POTUS - Donald J. Trump

[96583UP]

Here’s where the fun begins

nice

a good old fashioned american suing

no weird political mish mash

just a couple of rich dicks going at it in court

i’m into this one

[dimejinky99]

This was 2011. This plane is old now. We can hope he cheapskates in the maintenance like he does everything
Everybody wins if this crashes with him in it. We get him dying screaming. His cult get to believe deep state/Mexicans/whatever your having yourself did it.

[elliseamos]

This was 2011. This plane is old now. We can hope he cheapskates in the maintenance like he does everything
Everybody wins if this crashes with him in it. We get him dying screaming. His cult get to believe deep state/Mexicans/whatever your having yourself did it.

Will Epstein be flying with him?

[The Town]

I'd prefer he slip on some ice on live TV but beggars can't be choosers, certainly.

[BurtReynolds]

youtube removed his CPAC speech pretty quickly. Getting too many views heh.

[wease]

youtube removed his CPAC speech pretty quickly. Getting too many views heh.

Yes. That’s the reason...

[The Argonaut]

Totally normal country.

Is that pre or post pandemic?

It's actually the reason why god decided to inflict the pandemic upon us

[Higgs]

youtube removed his CPAC speech pretty quickly. Getting too many views heh.

Yes. That’s the reason...

Genuine question - why did they pull it? Surely it is of interest to a lot of people.

[McParadigm]

youtube removed his CPAC speech pretty quickly. Getting too many views heh.

Yes. That’s the reason...

Genuine question - why did they pull it? Surely it is of interest to a lot of people.

Good question. Why don’t you watch it here, here, or here and see if you can tell why YouTube has banned it.

[Mickey]

Damn you mean Jack Prilosec is not a reputable source?

[96583UP]

Damn you mean Jack Prilosec is not a reputable source?

Spoiler: show

[Higgs]

youtube removed his CPAC speech pretty quickly. Getting too many views heh.

Yes. That’s the reason...

Genuine question - why did they pull it? Surely it is of interest to a lot of people.

Good question. Why don’t you watch it here, here, or here and see if you can tell why YouTube has banned it.

Didn't think it would actually have been pulled. FAKE NEWS. SAD.

I of course could have done my own research on this but I am quite happy these days essentially ignoring all things Trump. It's quite liberating.

[LetMeSleep]

It's a new dawn
It's a new day

[Bi_3]

Ouch!

https://www.mediaite.com/news/washingto ... -comments/

The Post had reported in early January that while on the Dec. 23, 2020, call, Trump said that Frances Watson, the chief investigator for Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, should “find the fraud,” and that she would be a “national hero,” according to Jordan Fuchs, the deputy secretary of state.

According to the correction and revised story, Trump did not say either of those things.

[simple schoolboy]

Its a shame there are relatively few places you can host something relatively insensitive to US pressure. *waving at Snowden

[B]

Enthusiasm seems to be slipping.

[96583UP]

lol

[96583UP]

Its a shame there are relatively few places you can host something relatively insensitive to US pressure. *waving at Snowden

now that he's not a president and will be hosted by some 2-bit operation hopefully he just gets hacked to shit by one of the 2 million well-resourced people/groups he offended while in office

[dimejinky99]

[Mickey]

Bad argument, people with messy desks are sub-human.