Kansas City Chiefs

Discuss your hatred for the Yankees here.
Post Reply
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by epilogue »

96583UP wrote:KC is super dynamic but just so good it’s almost boring to watch

kinda like the 90s Bulls - you get sick of them constantly winning
Does

Not

Compute
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by epilogue »

First Tampa Bay murders the Chiefs' offense. Then Marty Schottenheimer passed. Now Terez Paylor...

Fuck...

Rough few days for KC fans.

RIP :peace:
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by epilogue »

Good content right here.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by epilogue »

KC releases both Swartz and Fisher.

We have no starting tackles. Which, as we saw in the Super Bowl, is exactly how you win championships.

Awesome.
User avatar
lennytheweedwhacker
The Master
Posts: 47949
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:21 pm

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by lennytheweedwhacker »

7-9
And they say that a hero could save us
I'm not gonna stand here and wait
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

Image
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by 96583UP »

haha saw this thread and just knew that was coming
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by elliseamos »

This seems to be playing out exactly like Seattle where they won one year, lost the next year to Brady, then figured their qb would be fine with no online for the next 7 seasons until said qb demanded a trade.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by epilogue »

elliseamos wrote:This seems to be playing out exactly like Seattle where they won one year, lost the next year to Brady, then figured their qb would be fine with no online for the next 7 seasons until said qb demanded a trade.
:lol:

I think this one plays out just a little differently. But I guess time will tell.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by elliseamos »

epilogue wrote:
elliseamos wrote:This seems to be playing out exactly like Seattle where they won one year, lost the next year to Brady, then figured their qb would be fine with no online for the next 7 seasons until said qb demanded a trade.
:lol:

I think this one plays out just a little differently. But I guess time will tell.
Which one of Hill or Kelce will play the role of Beast Mode?
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by epilogue »

elliseamos wrote:
epilogue wrote:
elliseamos wrote:This seems to be playing out exactly like Seattle where they won one year, lost the next year to Brady, then figured their qb would be fine with no online for the next 7 seasons until said qb demanded a trade.
:lol:

I think this one plays out just a little differently. But I guess time will tell.
Which one of Hill or Kelce will play the role of Beast Mode?
Ha!

Have to be Kelce.
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84847
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by epilogue »

Veach always has a plan.
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

He’s just copying Brady.
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by 96583UP »

<checks if payton manning engaged in similar restructure first>
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
E.H. Ruddock
Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
Posts: 51787
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by E.H. Ruddock »

<checks how many rings Peyton Manning has >
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by Bammer »

Does this impact the anount of money he is being paid? I don’t understand. Why wouldn’t everyone do this every chance they get?
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by 96583UP »

i think it has more to do with whether the club is willing to do it - i.e. pay the guy in a lump sum up front

cash flow
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by Bammer »

96583UP wrote:i think it has more to do with whether the club is willing to do it - i.e. pay the guy in a lump sum up front

cash flow
Ok yeah I think that makes sense. Risk paying now, non-refundable, guy gets hurt or whatever and keeps the money.

Why would the player ever resist doing this?

Why do they make it sound like the player is helping the team by doing this?
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
96583UP
The Master
Posts: 29574
Joined: Sun September 15, 2013 5:50 am

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by 96583UP »

Bammer wrote:
96583UP wrote:i think it has more to do with whether the club is willing to do it - i.e. pay the guy in a lump sum up front

cash flow
Ok yeah I think that makes sense. Risk paying now, non-refundable, guy gets hurt or whatever and keeps the money.

Why would the player ever resist doing this?

Why do they make it sound like the player is helping the team by doing this?
i don't know why a player would resist - maybe bc their agent gets a cut so it's a net loss after transaction fees

they are helping the team bc it allows them to manage the salary cap better

to hire more players to get injured right before the superbowl so pat mahomes can play with an injured toe behind britt reid at LT
All posts by this account, even those referencing real things, are entirely fictional and are for entertainment purposes only; i.e. very low-quality entertainment. These may contain coarse language and due to their content should not be viewed by anyone
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: Kansas City Chiefs

Post by Bammer »

96583UP wrote:
Bammer wrote:
96583UP wrote:i think it has more to do with whether the club is willing to do it - i.e. pay the guy in a lump sum up front

cash flow
Ok yeah I think that makes sense. Risk paying now, non-refundable, guy gets hurt or whatever and keeps the money.

Why would the player ever resist doing this?

Why do they make it sound like the player is helping the team by doing this?
i don't know why a player would resist - maybe bc their agent gets a cut so it's a net loss after transaction fees

they are helping the team bc it allows them to manage the salary cap better

to hire more players to get injured right before the superbowl so pat mahomes can play with an injured toe behind britt reid at LT
I mean, they praise the player for doing it. Like he’s a martyr or something.

Sounds like a slam dunk for the player and absolutely no reason ever not to do it. Fuck the fkn agent.
(she/him/theirs)
Post Reply