Lightning Bolt: the official album thread

General Pearl Jam discussion.
Post Reply

Rank Lightning Bolt

5 stars
1
1%
4 stars
4
5%
3 stars
29
37%
2 stars
30
38%
1 star
14
18%
 
Total votes: 78

User avatar
Noaheb
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 452
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 5:01 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Noaheb »

Iowaska_Experience wrote:
stupidmop wrote:
stip wrote:
harmless wrote:
stip wrote:
harmless wrote:How come 'Getaway' has no production bells and whistles or extra instrumentation? Maybe that's why most people are liking it so much. Everything else has BoB all over it.
I think everything he does on LB is fantastic. Swallowed whole sounds really good too. And the stuff in sirens sounds appropriate for the style--if I have a beef there it's with the style, and that's not BoB
Well, I'm pretty sure it's BoB's influence. I'm fairly sure BoB would've softened the intent of the "dark Pink Floyd sound" while helping him arrange it. But I try not to think about that and enjoy the song for what it is.

perhaps. Thus far I have no real beefs with anything BoB did on this record except perhaps the two fadeouts--some of sirens excess, maybe, but I don't know what's him
I 'blame' him for eddies voice being too loud and sounding like its sitting ontop of the music. I thought the same this about backspacer too, and that quote about having eddie good and loud leads me to believe thats mostly his doing.

I know that doesn't bother everybody though.
Yeah, it's not as much fun when you can make out 90% of what Ed's saying right off the bat, versus the historical 60%.
I remember thinking how low his voice was on all albums through RA and being disappointed he wasn't louder and thinking it was Ed not wanting to be the focus because he didn't want the fame blah blah blah-which may be true-but I soon realized how much better those albums are because of it...he shines irregardless
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

Noaheb wrote:
Iowaska_Experience wrote:
stupidmop wrote:
stip wrote:
harmless wrote:
stip wrote:
harmless wrote:How come 'Getaway' has no production bells and whistles or extra instrumentation? Maybe that's why most people are liking it so much. Everything else has BoB all over it.
I think everything he does on LB is fantastic. Swallowed whole sounds really good too. And the stuff in sirens sounds appropriate for the style--if I have a beef there it's with the style, and that's not BoB
Well, I'm pretty sure it's BoB's influence. I'm fairly sure BoB would've softened the intent of the "dark Pink Floyd sound" while helping him arrange it. But I try not to think about that and enjoy the song for what it is.

perhaps. Thus far I have no real beefs with anything BoB did on this record except perhaps the two fadeouts--some of sirens excess, maybe, but I don't know what's him
I 'blame' him for eddies voice being too loud and sounding like its sitting ontop of the music. I thought the same this about backspacer too, and that quote about having eddie good and loud leads me to believe thats mostly his doing.

I know that doesn't bother everybody though.
Yeah, it's not as much fun when you can make out 90% of what Ed's saying right off the bat, versus the historical 60%.
I remember thinking how low his voice was on all albums through RA and being disappointed he wasn't louder and thinking it was Ed not wanting to be the focus because he didn't want the fame blah blah blah-which may be true-but I soon realized how much better those albums are because of it...he shines irregardless
:shake:
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Noaheb
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 452
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 5:01 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Noaheb »

okay so why does spell check think irregardless is actually a word?
WTF?
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

:lol:
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Noaheb
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 452
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 5:01 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Noaheb »

harmless wrote:
Noaheb wrote:
Iowaska_Experience wrote:
stupidmop wrote:
stip wrote:
harmless wrote:
stip wrote:
harmless wrote:How come 'Getaway' has no production bells and whistles or extra instrumentation? Maybe that's why most people are liking it so much. Everything else has BoB all over it.
I think everything he does on LB is fantastic. Swallowed whole sounds really good too. And the stuff in sirens sounds appropriate for the style--if I have a beef there it's with the style, and that's not BoB
Well, I'm pretty sure it's BoB's influence. I'm fairly sure BoB would've softened the intent of the "dark Pink Floyd sound" while helping him arrange it. But I try not to think about that and enjoy the song for what it is.

perhaps. Thus far I have no real beefs with anything BoB did on this record except perhaps the two fadeouts--some of sirens excess, maybe, but I don't know what's him
I 'blame' him for eddies voice being too loud and sounding like its sitting ontop of the music. I thought the same this about backspacer too, and that quote about having eddie good and loud leads me to believe thats mostly his doing.

I know that doesn't bother everybody though.
Yeah, it's not as much fun when you can make out 90% of what Ed's saying right off the bat, versus the historical 60%.
I remember thinking how low his voice was on all albums through RA and being disappointed he wasn't louder and thinking it was Ed not wanting to be the focus because he didn't want the fame blah blah blah-which may be true-but I soon realized how much better those albums are because of it...he shines irregardless
:shake:
had to see who would comment first :wave:
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Mine »

Noaheb wrote:okay so why does spell check think irregardless is actually a word?
WTF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

Mine wrote:
Noaheb wrote:okay so why does spell check think irregardless is actually a word?
WTF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless
Ugh. Words whose meaning is not predictable from the meanings of their constituent morphemes are just the worst, aren't they?
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Noaheb
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 452
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 5:01 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Noaheb »

Mine wrote:
Noaheb wrote:okay so why does spell check think irregardless is actually a word?
WTF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless
oh for christs sake!
User avatar
Chris_H_2
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15625
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:55 pm
Location: An office full of assholes

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Chris_H_2 »

Mine wrote:
Noaheb wrote:okay so why does spell check think irregardless is actually a word?
WTF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless
That's unpossible!
User avatar
Mine
AnalLog
Posts: 1833
Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Mine »

Chris_H_2 wrote:
Mine wrote:
Noaheb wrote:okay so why does spell check think irregardless is actually a word?
WTF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless
That's unpossible!
refudiable!
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

Mine wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Mine wrote:
Noaheb wrote:okay so why does spell check think irregardless is actually a word?
WTF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless
That's unpossible!
refudiable!
Supposably.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Noaheb
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 452
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 5:01 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Noaheb »

harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Mine wrote:
Noaheb wrote:okay so why does spell check think irregardless is actually a word?
WTF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless
That's unpossible!
refudiable!
Supposably.
irrespective
irremindedly
irreminecently
User avatar
ABNorman
The Beef
Posts: 4475
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:16 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by ABNorman »

Noaheb wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Mine wrote:
Noaheb wrote:okay so why does spell check think irregardless is actually a word?
WTF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless
That's unpossible!
refudiable!
Supposably.
irrespective
irremindedly
irreminecently
Don't let Ed read these.
User avatar
Lounge Lizard
AnalLog
Posts: 1843
Joined: Tue July 23, 2013 6:51 am

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Lounge Lizard »

Noaheb wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Mine wrote:
Noaheb wrote:okay so why does spell check think irregardless is actually a word?
WTF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless
That's unpossible!
refudiable!
Supposably.
irrespective
irremindedly
irreminecently
lemmecatchmybreathtobreathable
Image Image
User avatar
EJ
Fake NYC Setlist Relayer
Posts: 7053
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:15 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by EJ »

Noaheb wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Mine wrote:
Noaheb wrote:okay so why does spell check think irregardless is actually a word?
WTF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless
That's unpossible!
refudiable!
Supposably.
irrespective
irremindedly
irreminecently
Eventually, this turns into the "I couldn't vs. could care less" debate.
User avatar
harmless
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 17337
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by harmless »

Lounge Lizard wrote:
Noaheb wrote:
harmless wrote:
Mine wrote:
Chris_H_2 wrote:
Mine wrote:
Noaheb wrote:okay so why does spell check think irregardless is actually a word?
WTF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irregardless
That's unpossible!
refudiable!
Supposably.
irrespective
irremindedly
irreminecently
lemmecatchmybreathtobreathable
Sirenade -- the new energy drink that'll have you wailing until the end.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37500
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Norah »

No way is irregardless a cromulent word.
User avatar
Noaheb
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 452
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 5:01 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Noaheb »

cutuphalfdead wrote:No way is irregardless a cromulent word.
ha!
User avatar
Noaheb
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 452
Joined: Sat January 05, 2013 5:01 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Noaheb »

allot...

oh and LTRP still sucks
User avatar
Iowaska_Experience
Broken Tamborine
Posts: 412
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 6:04 pm

Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15

Post by Iowaska_Experience »

Noaheb wrote:allot...

oh and LTRP still sucks
I take comfort in knowing that, yet again, my favorite song on an album is the one most widely despised . . . . .
Escape is never, the safest path
Post Reply