B is better on the logistics but this would seem to be a big deal globally, especially in poorer places, wouldn't it?
I just think new treatments for Americans is throwing good money after bad, when you could redirect money and effort to people who actually want COVID relief and can't get it.
Ah yes, the public health religion of no pharmeceutical intervention but the one true vaxx. And you wonder why people thought y'all were lying about horse paste?
If immunity falls off a cliff after 6, 8 months for some significant portion of the population, we would always need therapeutics. 6 month boosters forever is untenable. (We haven't promoted that yet because we wouldn't want to lose faith in our lord and savior the vaccine)
B is better on the logistics but this would seem to be a big deal globally, especially in poorer places, wouldn't it?
I just think new treatments for Americans is throwing good money after bad, when you could redirect money and effort to people who actually want COVID relief and can't get it.
Ah yes, the public health religion of no pharmeceutical intervention but the one true vaxx. And you wonder why people thought y'all were lying about horse paste?
If immunity falls off a cliff after 6, 8 months for some significant portion of the population, we would always need therapeutics. 6 month boosters forever is untenable. (We haven't promoted that yet because we wouldn't want to lose faith in our lord and savior the vaccine)
I have no problem with the pill. I'm glad we have another weapon in the fight against COVID. But will the people who need it take it? It's an emergency authorized, newly developed drug. What if changes your DNA? It's definitely big enough to contain an RFID tracker. Even after you take it you can still spread COVID, so what's the point?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
B is better on the logistics but this would seem to be a big deal globally, especially in poorer places, wouldn't it?
I just think new treatments for Americans is throwing good money after bad, when you could redirect money and effort to people who actually want COVID relief and can't get it.
Ah yes, the public health religion of no pharmeceutical intervention but the one true vaxx. And you wonder why people thought y'all were lying about horse paste?
If immunity falls off a cliff after 6, 8 months for some significant portion of the population, we would always need therapeutics. 6 month boosters forever is untenable. (We haven't promoted that yet because we wouldn't want to lose faith in our lord and savior the vaccine)
I have no problem with the pill. I'm glad we have another weapon in the fight against COVID. But will the people who need it take it? It's an emergency authorized, newly developed drug. What if changes your DNA? It's definitely big enough to contain an RFID tracker. Even after you take it you can still spread COVID, so what's the point?
So the default now is to always be enthusiastic about any new drugs developed by our pharmagods?
B is better on the logistics but this would seem to be a big deal globally, especially in poorer places, wouldn't it?
I just think new treatments for Americans is throwing good money after bad, when you could redirect money and effort to people who actually want COVID relief and can't get it.
This is a new low for you, yes?
"The fatal flaw of all revolutionaries is that they know how to tear things down but don't have a f**king clue about how to build anything."
I just think new treatments for Americans is throwing good money after bad, when you could redirect money and effort to people who actually want COVID relief and can't get it.
