Lightning Bolt: the official album thread
-
wilkins
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Tue March 19, 2013 3:31 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
So Letterman was debunked?
- Thejambi
- Rank This Poster
- Posts: 4301
- Joined: Fri April 12, 2013 8:12 pm
- Location: Potato
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Turns out Dave's song was Go after all.wilkins wrote:So Letterman was debunked?
There's the dog. You can't fake that stuff. Confess with your mouth.
- dprival78
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2152
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:13 pm
- Location: CT
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
no. they'll be appearing and debuting "billy billy microp_nis"wilkins wrote:So Letterman was debunked?
- evenslow
- Stone's Bitch
- Posts: 9164
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
- Location: unnamed mental hospital
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
I know this is from 5 pages ago but it's nice to hear a critique from someone who knows what they're talking about. More of this. I'm expecting a song by song review of the vocals on LB by the way.Release_Me wrote:There's nothing in that Wrigley performance which shows Ed struggling with LB. He pretty much nails everything except the outro where he goes off his game after getting mad at Mike. Singing high while 'straining' as you say is a stylistic choice. That gritty tone requires a certain amount of straining but LB is not the top of Ed's range. Ed's always done the gritty screams because they sound bad-ass and that goes with the style of most of PJ's rockers. Singing high in a clean voice is more metal, especially in the fifth octave. Ed has no issues going upto A4 (In Hiding, Present Tense, Yellow Ledbetter, etc.) in a clean voice. He has also sung a very clean and impressive Bb4 in a live version of Arc from 2009. So within the upper fourth octave, it's a stylistic choice. Not many PJ songs ever go higher than that anyway. An exception is the clean D5 in Dissident (studio) which I've heard him replicate live once in 2003 (that's a difficult one). When Ed screams 'Loooove' in LROM, that's pretty much near the top of his range. Those are also D5s, very powerful but gritty. It's a stylistic thing as well as a skill thing when he sings that high. He hasn't honed the skill of singing clean fifth octave notes ala Cornell, but he can sure as hell scream them.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
evenslow wrote:I know this is from 5 pages ago but it's nice to hear a critique from someone who knows what they're talking about.Release_Me wrote:There's nothing in that Wrigley performance which shows Ed struggling with LB. He pretty much nails everything except the outro where he goes off his game after getting mad at Mike. Singing high while 'straining' as you say is a stylistic choice. That gritty tone requires a certain amount of straining but LB is not the top of Ed's range. Ed's always done the gritty screams because they sound bad-ass and that goes with the style of most of PJ's rockers. Singing high in a clean voice is more metal, especially in the fifth octave. Ed has no issues going upto A4 (In Hiding, Present Tense, Yellow Ledbetter, etc.) in a clean voice. He has also sung a very clean and impressive Bb4 in a live version of Arc from 2009. So within the upper fourth octave, it's a stylistic choice. Not many PJ songs ever go higher than that anyway. An exception is the clean D5 in Dissident (studio) which I've heard him replicate live once in 2003 (that's a difficult one). When Ed screams 'Loooove' in LROM, that's pretty much near the top of his range. Those are also D5s, very powerful but gritty. It's a stylistic thing as well as a skill thing when he sings that high. He hasn't honed the skill of singing clean fifth octave notes ala Cornell, but he can sure as hell scream them.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- Dr. Van Nostrand
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8898
- Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
apparentlywilkins wrote:So Letterman was debunked?
- Dr. Van Nostrand
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 8898
- Joined: Tue December 18, 2012 8:33 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
yep, make it happenMirella wrote:blueviper wrote:Mirella wrote:That is plain meanblueviper wrote:gems and rhinestones wrote:Well that sucks, no Pearl Jam on Letterman 10/8
Which one of you photo-shopped that tv guide picture?
Moi.
I was wondering when that would be debunked.Maybe you can go and post on the Bugs mailinglist Facebook page and apologise for it. Link is in my sig.
groetjes,
Mirella
Yikes! Sorry! All in good fun!![]()
![]()
Now the only thing you can do to make up for this is make them play there on the 8th
![]()
groetjes,
Mirella(we got lots of visitors because of that 'news', so it's all good)
- Jaeti
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2642
- Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
I missed that post, but glad I saw it now. Yeah, more of this, please.evenslow wrote:I know this is from 5 pages ago but it's nice to hear a critique from someone who knows what they're talking about. More of this. I'm expecting a song by song review of the vocals on LB by the way.Release_Me wrote:There's nothing in that Wrigley performance which shows Ed struggling with LB. He pretty much nails everything except the outro where he goes off his game after getting mad at Mike. Singing high while 'straining' as you say is a stylistic choice. That gritty tone requires a certain amount of straining but LB is not the top of Ed's range. Ed's always done the gritty screams because they sound bad-ass and that goes with the style of most of PJ's rockers. Singing high in a clean voice is more metal, especially in the fifth octave. Ed has no issues going upto A4 (In Hiding, Present Tense, Yellow Ledbetter, etc.) in a clean voice. He has also sung a very clean and impressive Bb4 in a live version of Arc from 2009. So within the upper fourth octave, it's a stylistic choice. Not many PJ songs ever go higher than that anyway. An exception is the clean D5 in Dissident (studio) which I've heard him replicate live once in 2003 (that's a difficult one). When Ed screams 'Loooove' in LROM, that's pretty much near the top of his range. Those are also D5s, very powerful but gritty. It's a stylistic thing as well as a skill thing when he sings that high. He hasn't honed the skill of singing clean fifth octave notes ala Cornell, but he can sure as hell scream them.
- evenslow
- Stone's Bitch
- Posts: 9164
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
- Location: unnamed mental hospital
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
This was unkind of you, especially considering I'm the President of the Make Harmless Write a Drum Review campaign.harmless wrote:evenslow wrote:I know this is from 5 pages ago but it's nice to hear a critique from someone who knows what they're talking about.Release_Me wrote:There's nothing in that Wrigley performance which shows Ed struggling with LB. He pretty much nails everything except the outro where he goes off his game after getting mad at Mike. Singing high while 'straining' as you say is a stylistic choice. That gritty tone requires a certain amount of straining but LB is not the top of Ed's range. Ed's always done the gritty screams because they sound bad-ass and that goes with the style of most of PJ's rockers. Singing high in a clean voice is more metal, especially in the fifth octave. Ed has no issues going upto A4 (In Hiding, Present Tense, Yellow Ledbetter, etc.) in a clean voice. He has also sung a very clean and impressive Bb4 in a live version of Arc from 2009. So within the upper fourth octave, it's a stylistic choice. Not many PJ songs ever go higher than that anyway. An exception is the clean D5 in Dissident (studio) which I've heard him replicate live once in 2003 (that's a difficult one). When Ed screams 'Loooove' in LROM, that's pretty much near the top of his range. Those are also D5s, very powerful but gritty. It's a stylistic thing as well as a skill thing when he sings that high. He hasn't honed the skill of singing clean fifth octave notes ala Cornell, but he can sure as hell scream them.
Release_Me covers vox.
Harmless covers drums.
McP can do production.
Who's got the expertise to talk guitars/bass?
I've got Boom covered.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
You can't put me in a box like this, I refuse to be typecast.evenslow wrote:This was unkind of you, especially considering I'm the President of the Make Harmless Write a Drum Review campaign.harmless wrote:evenslow wrote:I know this is from 5 pages ago but it's nice to hear a critique from someone who knows what they're talking about.Release_Me wrote:There's nothing in that Wrigley performance which shows Ed struggling with LB. He pretty much nails everything except the outro where he goes off his game after getting mad at Mike. Singing high while 'straining' as you say is a stylistic choice. That gritty tone requires a certain amount of straining but LB is not the top of Ed's range. Ed's always done the gritty screams because they sound bad-ass and that goes with the style of most of PJ's rockers. Singing high in a clean voice is more metal, especially in the fifth octave. Ed has no issues going upto A4 (In Hiding, Present Tense, Yellow Ledbetter, etc.) in a clean voice. He has also sung a very clean and impressive Bb4 in a live version of Arc from 2009. So within the upper fourth octave, it's a stylistic choice. Not many PJ songs ever go higher than that anyway. An exception is the clean D5 in Dissident (studio) which I've heard him replicate live once in 2003 (that's a difficult one). When Ed screams 'Loooove' in LROM, that's pretty much near the top of his range. Those are also D5s, very powerful but gritty. It's a stylistic thing as well as a skill thing when he sings that high. He hasn't honed the skill of singing clean fifth octave notes ala Cornell, but he can sure as hell scream them.
Release_Me covers vox.
Harmless covers drums.
McP can do production.
Who's got the expertise to talk guitars/bass?
I've got Boom covered.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- evenslow
- Stone's Bitch
- Posts: 9164
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
- Location: unnamed mental hospital
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
There's nothing wrong with it. John Holmes was great at porno. I didn't need him to do Shakespeare.harmless wrote:You can't put me in a box like this, I refuse to be typecast.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
- Cleverman
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Tue July 16, 2013 8:49 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
backed with "where's the sponge?"dprival78 wrote:no. they'll be appearing and debuting "billy billy microp_nis"wilkins wrote:So Letterman was debunked?
*edited for spelling (but not to make it funnier)
Last edited by Cleverman on Fri September 27, 2013 2:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Satisfaction is the death of desire.
- Strat
- Waiting for HVAC Repairman
- Posts: 35420
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:48 pm
- Location: Twin City Kisses
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Im the best guitar player in the world


- hlniv
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 3098
- Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
- Location: Louisville, KY
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
I'm not sure this was ever proven. How do we know Dave's Song is Go?Thejambi wrote:Turns out Dave's song was Go after all.wilkins wrote:So Letterman was debunked?
- ABNorman
- The Beef
- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:16 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Stop.hlniv wrote:I'm not sure this was ever proven. How do we know Dave's Song is Go?Thejambi wrote:Turns out Dave's song was Go after all.wilkins wrote:So Letterman was debunked?
- hlniv
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 3098
- Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
- Location: Louisville, KY
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
That's got to be hard to, you know, with his extreme height, large torso, and the size of his fingers and all.evenslow wrote: I've got Boom covered.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
ABNorman wrote:Stop.hlniv wrote:I'm not sure this was ever proven. How do we know Dave's Song is Go?Thejambi wrote:Turns out Dave's song was Go after all.wilkins wrote:So Letterman was debunked?
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- hlniv
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 3098
- Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm
- Location: Louisville, KY
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
No, man, I think it was Go.ABNorman wrote:Stop.hlniv wrote:I'm not sure this was ever proven. How do we know Dave's Song is Go?Thejambi wrote:Turns out Dave's song was Go after all.wilkins wrote:So Letterman was debunked?
That's not the same song as Stop.
- ABNorman
- The Beef
- Posts: 4475
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:16 pm
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Yield.hlniv wrote:No, man, I think it was Go.ABNorman wrote:Stop.hlniv wrote:I'm not sure this was ever proven. How do we know Dave's Song is Go?Thejambi wrote:Turns out Dave's song was Go after all.wilkins wrote:So Letterman was debunked?
That's not the same song as Stop.
- evenslow
- Stone's Bitch
- Posts: 9164
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
- Location: unnamed mental hospital
Re: Lightning Bolt - October 15
Step One: entice Boom with XXXL Snuggie.hlniv wrote:That's got to be hard to, you know, with his extreme height, large torso, and the size of his fingers and all.evenslow wrote: I've got Boom covered.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM