Well to me that's not a throwaway concern, that's a really major potential drawback to the mandates. In and of itself that's not a reason to not do them if they're going to save lives, but I think I'm more concerned than Bi when he says that they'll work because people have to eat. Idk. I think this risks tremendous social upheaval, riots, violence, etc. Sometimes my students will say something like "They can't suspend us all" in response to violating the idea of the day that school administration is pathetically trying to enforce. I worry that we're about to see that kind of thinking take over in response to these mandates and I don't think it's much of a leap to suggest that people who are being prevented from working over this might come together and start protesting and that it could get very ugly.spike wrote: Yes, I understand. I just don’t happen to think our current administration is interested in perpetuating any of this once the pandemic’s under control.
And don’t worry - even if that is the master plan - this is all building up to Trump being elected again in a few years to wash it all away.
That wasn't really my point before, though. Yes, I'm worried about the future as I think we always should be whenever any government starts using a new power or using an old power in a new way, but that wasn't my focus either. My point is that while vax mandates may, and I say may because I'm not convinced that they will work, be necessary and I'm willing to admit that I don't think the people making these mandates are evil or view themselves as dystopian tyrants, I remain extremely uncomfortable with the idea of not allowing an adult to work if she won't get this vaccine. It is certainly possible that it is the least bad of bad options, in which case it's something that should probably be done, but it's not something to celebrate, and I don't think that people who come down on the other side of that are evil or stupid and I think the concerns with authoritarianism are real.