What are the rumors?BurtReynolds wrote:Story is getting crazier.
Baldwin is fucked if the rumors are true.
America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52027
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35967
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
qedmacphisto wrote:I guess he got tired of wondering and decided to find out for himself.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35967
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
i assume he's referring to corners being cut on production, union vs non, etc. baldwin's a producer.E.H. Ruddock wrote:What are the rumors?BurtReynolds wrote:Story is getting crazier.
Baldwin is fucked if the rumors are true.
this is probably just standard business on any production, however.
- BurtReynolds
- An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
- Posts: 46240
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
- Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
Financially fucked I mean, since he was a producer and there were problems on the set beforehand.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... ssion=true
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... ssion=true
RM's resident disinformation expert.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
The stunt double had two or more "misfires" previously. Does that mean he discharged blanks when he wasn't supposed to? To gun people that generally means a gun didn't go bang when you intended it to, are the film people using the term differently?BurtReynolds wrote:Financially fucked I mean, since he was a producer and there were problems on the set beforehand.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... ssion=true
Also, using "hot" to mean a gun that is not empty is not a very useful distinction. A "hot" gun could be loaded with blanks or ... what? C'mon Hollywood, use terms that are understandable to those outside the industry.
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52027
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
I guess they have evidence that the prop person called out a cold gun before handing it to him. What a fucked up situation
Clouuuuds Rolll byyy...BANG BANG BANG BANG
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
It makes me wonder how often people in Hollywood are pointing functional firearms at each other because they've been told they're unloaded. Seems like a bad practice.E.H. Ruddock wrote:I guess they have evidence that the prop person called out a cold gun before handing it to him. What a fucked up situation
- Biff Pocoroba
- TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
- Posts: 4801
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm
- Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
Of course there are conservative wing nuts taking pot shots at Baldwin but for Newsmax to remind viewers of his well documented anger outbursts and imply that the shooting might not have been an accident is a bit much.
- macphisto
- Gone
- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Mon May 07, 2018 1:03 am
- Location: August 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
It’s really not.Biff Pocoroba wrote:Of course there are conservative wing nuts taking pot shots at Baldwin but for Newsmax to remind viewers of his well documented anger outbursts and imply that the shooting might not have been an accident is a bit much.

-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
Sounds like Hollywood safety standards allow "dry firing" of functional firearms at people on set. No firing of blanks at people, but if some dude tells you its a cold gun, go nuts. Why do they think they don't have to follow the same basic 4 rules as everyone else?
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
The first line of my Robocop 1987 reaction video.simple schoolboy wrote:Sounds like Hollywood safety standards allow "dry firing" of functional firearms at people on set.
(patriotic choking noises)
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
In '87 they didn't have realistic airsoft reproductions of basically any popular firearm.McParadigm wrote:The first line of my Robocop 1987 reaction video.simple schoolboy wrote:Sounds like Hollywood safety standards allow "dry firing" of functional firearms at people on set.
I'm similarly annoyed that film productions got covid carveouts when things were on lockdown. They could source covid testing, great. Why that made them not subject to facially neutral rules, I'm not sure. Same thing here.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
What are the chances that it was a wadcutter? Profile not too different from a blank for a wheel gun.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
Nevermind, no boomer casting his own wadcutters and mixing them in with homemade blanks required:
https://amp.tmz.com/2021/10/23/alec-bal ... ssion=true
*If TMZ is to be believed
https://amp.tmz.com/2021/10/23/alec-bal ... ssion=true
*If TMZ is to be believed
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
Rittenhouse trial coming up. Pretty standard motions today*, but the coverage would have you believe otherwise.
*the likelihood of success is apparently very locality dependent. NY and Urban CA, prohibiting the use of 'victim' until closing is pretty normal, elsewhere your mileage may vary.
*the likelihood of success is apparently very locality dependent. NY and Urban CA, prohibiting the use of 'victim' until closing is pretty normal, elsewhere your mileage may vary.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35967
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
you're almost there. let me help...simple schoolboy wrote:Rittenhouse trial coming up. Pretty standard motions today*, but the coverage would have you believe otherwise.
*the likelihood of success is apparently very locality dependent. NY and Urban CA, prohibiting the use of 'victim' until closing is pretty normal, elsewhere your mileage may vary.
have those that were shot dead been convicted of rioting, looting, or arson?
Last edited by spike on Wed October 27, 2021 3:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
- macphisto
- Gone
- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Mon May 07, 2018 1:03 am
- Location: August 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
No, I believe they’re too dead to stand trial.
- spike
- The Master
- Posts: 35967
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
so what should we refer to them as? the deceased?
- macphisto
- Gone
- Posts: 2823
- Joined: Mon May 07, 2018 1:03 am
- Location: August 2020 Poster of the Month
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
For purposes of the trial, whatever they were last doing. Calling them victims precludes a fair trial.
-
simple schoolboy
- Misplaced My Sponge
- Posts: 5934
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am
Re: America..why won't you just ban the fucking gun?
Judge allowed that language in closing if the defense can establish a fact pattern supporting such an assertion. Seems unlikely they will be able to. Did you read the entire thread?spike wrote:you're almost there. let me help...simple schoolboy wrote:Rittenhouse trial coming up. Pretty standard motions today*, but the coverage would have you believe otherwise.
*the likelihood of success is apparently very locality dependent. NY and Urban CA, prohibiting the use of 'victim' until closing is pretty normal, elsewhere your mileage may vary.
have those that were shot dead been convicted of rioting, looting, or arson?
The prosecution can refer to the decedents/ disarmed as victims if they can argue a fact pattern supporting that.
The time not to do that is opening, no evidence has been presented yet.
Way to be tedious.
Don't worry, anyone materially affected by rioting has been purged from the jury pool, they'll get him on something based on the adamant stupid takes visible everywhere on this.
