Yeah but SC already had Pete Carrolldad wrote:bob stoops coached in norman for 18 years.
settle down.
College Football
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22815
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: College Football
(she/him/theirs)
-
dad
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 19190
- Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm
Re: College Football
i don't think stoops ever alluded to interest in the USC job.Bammer wrote:Yeah but SC already had Pete Carrolldad wrote:bob stoops coached in norman for 18 years.
settle down.
lincoln riley is the one who left OU for USC.
where are you going with this?
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil
now when i regular i can promote regularity
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22815
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: College Football
Just Bammin’ around here man don’t worry about itdad wrote:i don't think stoops ever alluded to interest in the USC job.Bammer wrote:Yeah but SC already had Pete Carrolldad wrote:bob stoops coached in norman for 18 years.
settle down.
lincoln riley is the one who left OU for USC.
where are you going with this?
(she/him/theirs)
- E.H. Ruddock
- Guys, I am not a moderator! I swear to God! Why does everyone think I'm a moderator?
- Posts: 52023
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:48 pm
- Athletic Supporter
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue January 02, 2018 6:14 am
- Location: UP NORTH
Re: College Football
I SAIDChris_H_2 wrote:It’s great … to be … a Michigan Wolverine!!
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: College Football
A lot of people seem to be upset about 2 SEC teams being in this again. Those same people don't seem to be suggesting a 5th team to replace them, however.
-
dad
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 19190
- Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm
Re: College Football
i'm not mad about either. am i sick of seeing bama in the playoff? sure...
I'll be rooting for Michigan and Cincinnati though.
I'll be rooting for Michigan and Cincinnati though.
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil
now when i regular i can promote regularity
- Athletic Supporter
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue January 02, 2018 6:14 am
- Location: UP NORTH
Re: College Football
In the current system, they both deserve to be there.Monkey_Driven wrote:A lot of people seem to be upset about 2 SEC teams being in this again. Those same people don't seem to be suggesting a 5th team to replace them, however.
The best system would be 8 teams. Take the Power 5 champs, the top ranked G5 team and 2 at-large. Play the first round on campus 2 weeks after the conf. champ games, then the semis on NY weekend and the champ a week or so later.
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: College Football
Yes, but have a caveat where everyone still has to be ranked in the top 20 or something to make it for the auto-qualifiers.Athletic Supporter wrote:In the current system, they both deserve to be there.Monkey_Driven wrote:A lot of people seem to be upset about 2 SEC teams being in this again. Those same people don't seem to be suggesting a 5th team to replace them, however.
The best system would be 8 teams. Take the Power 5 champs, the top ranked G5 team and 2 at-large. Play the first round on campus 2 weeks after the conf. champ games, then the semis on NY weekend and the champ a week or so later.
- Athletic Supporter
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue January 02, 2018 6:14 am
- Location: UP NORTH
Re: College Football
Nah. Make conferences matter again.Monkey_Driven wrote:Yes, but have a caveat where everyone still has to be ranked in the top 20 or something to make it for the auto-qualifiers.Athletic Supporter wrote:In the current system, they both deserve to be there.Monkey_Driven wrote:A lot of people seem to be upset about 2 SEC teams being in this again. Those same people don't seem to be suggesting a 5th team to replace them, however.
The best system would be 8 teams. Take the Power 5 champs, the top ranked G5 team and 2 at-large. Play the first round on campus 2 weeks after the conf. champ games, then the semis on NY weekend and the champ a week or so later.
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: College Football
Why reward shitty conferences?Athletic Supporter wrote:Nah. Make conferences matter again.Monkey_Driven wrote:Yes, but have a caveat where everyone still has to be ranked in the top 20 or something to make it for the auto-qualifiers.Athletic Supporter wrote:In the current system, they both deserve to be there.Monkey_Driven wrote:A lot of people seem to be upset about 2 SEC teams being in this again. Those same people don't seem to be suggesting a 5th team to replace them, however.
The best system would be 8 teams. Take the Power 5 champs, the top ranked G5 team and 2 at-large. Play the first round on campus 2 weeks after the conf. champ games, then the semis on NY weekend and the champ a week or so later.
- Athletic Supporter
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue January 02, 2018 6:14 am
- Location: UP NORTH
Re: College Football
The cream will rise to the top anyway. Does it matter if it's a 2 loss Texas A&M or a 2 loss Wake Forest?Monkey_Driven wrote:Why reward shitty conferences?Athletic Supporter wrote:Nah. Make conferences matter again.Monkey_Driven wrote:Yes, but have a caveat where everyone still has to be ranked in the top 20 or something to make it for the auto-qualifiers.Athletic Supporter wrote:In the current system, they both deserve to be there.Monkey_Driven wrote:A lot of people seem to be upset about 2 SEC teams being in this again. Those same people don't seem to be suggesting a 5th team to replace them, however.
The best system would be 8 teams. Take the Power 5 champs, the top ranked G5 team and 2 at-large. Play the first round on campus 2 weeks after the conf. champ games, then the semis on NY weekend and the champ a week or so later.
- Monkey_Driven
- The Master
- Posts: 28128
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:36 pm
- Location: Mushroom Kingdom
Re: College Football
Yes, because Texas A&M would at least have the potential for a competitive first round game.Athletic Supporter wrote:The cream will rise to the top anyway. Does it matter if it's a 2 loss Texas A&M or a 2 loss Wake Forest?Monkey_Driven wrote:Why reward shitty conferences?Athletic Supporter wrote:Nah. Make conferences matter again.Monkey_Driven wrote:Yes, but have a caveat where everyone still has to be ranked in the top 20 or something to make it for the auto-qualifiers.Athletic Supporter wrote:In the current system, they both deserve to be there.Monkey_Driven wrote:A lot of people seem to be upset about 2 SEC teams being in this again. Those same people don't seem to be suggesting a 5th team to replace them, however.
The best system would be 8 teams. Take the Power 5 champs, the top ranked G5 team and 2 at-large. Play the first round on campus 2 weeks after the conf. champ games, then the semis on NY weekend and the champ a week or so later.
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22815
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
Re: College Football
This will all be moot within 10 years when college football as we know it gives way to Minor League Football.
(she/him/theirs)
- Athletic Supporter
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue January 02, 2018 6:14 am
- Location: UP NORTH
Re: College Football
Let's just have a SEC tournament and everyone else fights for scraps.Monkey_Driven wrote:Yes, because Texas A&M would at least have the potential for a competitive first round game.Athletic Supporter wrote:The cream will rise to the top anyway. Does it matter if it's a 2 loss Texas A&M or a 2 loss Wake Forest?Monkey_Driven wrote:Why reward shitty conferences?Athletic Supporter wrote:Nah. Make conferences matter again.Monkey_Driven wrote:Yes, but have a caveat where everyone still has to be ranked in the top 20 or something to make it for the auto-qualifiers.Athletic Supporter wrote:In the current system, they both deserve to be there.Monkey_Driven wrote:A lot of people seem to be upset about 2 SEC teams being in this again. Those same people don't seem to be suggesting a 5th team to replace them, however.
The best system would be 8 teams. Take the Power 5 champs, the top ranked G5 team and 2 at-large. Play the first round on campus 2 weeks after the conf. champ games, then the semis on NY weekend and the champ a week or so later.
-
dad
- Posting (live)
- Posts: 19190
- Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm
Re: College Football
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil
now when i regular i can promote regularity
- Bammer
- mXn
- Posts: 22815
- Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
- Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.
- Athletic Supporter
- Banned from the Pit
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue January 02, 2018 6:14 am
- Location: UP NORTH
Re: College Football
It's possibly the longest running skit in SNL history.Bammer wrote:Man I wish I understood that
- Biff Pocoroba
- TIER 1 Essential Critical Infrastructure Worker
- Posts: 4801
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:08 pm
- Location: 5th floor, Bay 7, position 5740
Re: College Football
I see that the title game is in Indianapolis. I guess cities bid for them now like they do with the Super Bowl?