I had in mind the critics of Siren's being an 80's power ballad.harmless wrote:Mine wrote:It's accomplishment for them to be dated and contemporary at the same time, isn't it?harmless wrote:Well if you like. But just there you have:Mine wrote:Model role model....right?harmless wrote:There seems to be plenty of Ed quotes in which he said he'd never do something he's done since.
Vedder: And most bands, the longer they play together, they will become more comfortable. You go from punk-rock songs to contemporary music. It's a trap![]()
I... I don't know what you mean by that.
Song of the Moment: Sirens
- Mine
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Oh, OK. Yeah I don't mind that so much as the few nods to the contemporary radio ballad. I don't know about Nickelback or top 40 country etc. but I do hear Take That / Gary Barlow or Robbie Williams in places. I think the song is great but it probably counts as something Ed would have never done at one point.Mine wrote:I had in mind the critics of Siren's being an 80's power ballad.harmless wrote:Mine wrote:It's accomplishment for them to be dated and contemporary at the same time, isn't it?harmless wrote:Well if you like. But just there you have:Mine wrote:Model role model....right?harmless wrote:There seems to be plenty of Ed quotes in which he said he'd never do something he's done since.
Vedder: And most bands, the longer they play together, they will become more comfortable. You go from punk-rock songs to contemporary music. It's a trap![]()
I... I don't know what you mean by that.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- Birds in Hell
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 16296
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 9:38 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
I'm onboard with all of this; Into the Wild is a more satisfying record than anything the band's done in years.Mine wrote:Ed needs to do some serious solo albums. It's not going to happen but it would be interesting. I'm genuinely curious about what a solo rock record by Ed would sound like. I don't think it's anywhere near a real possibility considering how much "Ed solo" ballads he writes for PJ records but i think doing something in a 100% artistic autonomy would all but hurt him and consequentially Pearl Jam. Just taking BS in consideration JB, SOS and UK could have been much more interesting or at the very least less cheesy if Ed relayed only on his own strengths and not BOB's and the band's as far as SOS is concerned.
-
jdopj
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:12 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
But isn't this Mike's song with Ed's lyrics? I don't think you could write Blood type lyrics with this music. I personally love the lyrics and the song. That being said, Future Days is all Ed.harmless wrote:Oh, OK. Yeah I don't mind that so much as the few nods to the contemporary radio ballad. I don't know about Nickelback or top 40 country etc. but I do hear Take That / Gary Barlow or Robbie Williams in places. I think the song is great but it probably counts as something Ed would have never done at one point.Mine wrote:I had in mind the critics of Siren's being an 80's power ballad.harmless wrote:Mine wrote:It's accomplishment for them to be dated and contemporary at the same time, isn't it?harmless wrote:Well if you like. But just there you have:Mine wrote:Model role model....right?harmless wrote:There seems to be plenty of Ed quotes in which he said he'd never do something he's done since.
Vedder: And most bands, the longer they play together, they will become more comfortable. You go from punk-rock songs to contemporary music. It's a trap![]()
I... I don't know what you mean by that.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Yeah but FD is just Ed. It's not remarkable but it doesn't sound like a boy band either. Sirens kind of does. As I said, I do like it a lot, I'm just pointing out that it touches on styles that Ed has said he never would, which was meant to be an amusing comment more than a serious one. I'm not sure the only possibilities were schlock love ballad or "Blood" either, not sure where that comes from. We don't really know where Mike's Pink Floyd ideas stop and BoB's radio-friendly rock ballad ideas start, but the song is a slightly jarring mix of both.jdopj wrote:But isn't this Mike's song with Ed's lyrics? I don't think you could write Blood type lyrics with this music. I personally love the lyrics and the song. That being said, Future Days is all Ed.harmless wrote:Oh, OK. Yeah I don't mind that so much as the few nods to the contemporary radio ballad. I don't know about Nickelback or top 40 country etc. but I do hear Take That / Gary Barlow or Robbie Williams in places. I think the song is great but it probably counts as something Ed would have never done at one point.Mine wrote:I had in mind the critics of Siren's being an 80's power ballad.harmless wrote:Mine wrote:It's accomplishment for them to be dated and contemporary at the same time, isn't it?harmless wrote:Well if you like. But just there you have:Mine wrote:Model role model....right?harmless wrote:There seems to be plenty of Ed quotes in which he said he'd never do something he's done since.
Vedder: And most bands, the longer they play together, they will become more comfortable. You go from punk-rock songs to contemporary music. It's a trap![]()
I... I don't know what you mean by that.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
-
jdopj
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:12 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
You're right. We don't really know what Mike came in with and what (and who) it became. For me there are parts that I want to sing along loud to, but it is still missing that cliched hooky chorus. We were listening to 80's radio at work the other day, and Sirens does not remind me of Def Leppard.harmless wrote:Yeah but FD is just Ed. It's not remarkable but it doesn't sound like a boy band either. Sirens kind of does. As I said, I do like it a lot, I'm just pointing out that it touches on styles that Ed has said he never would, which was meant to be an amusing comment more than a serious one. I'm not sure the only possibilities were schlock love ballad or "Blood" either, not sure where that comes from. We don't really know where Mike's Pink Floyd ideas stop and BoB's radio-friendly rock ballad ideas start, but the song is a slightly jarring mix of both.jdopj wrote:But isn't this Mike's song with Ed's lyrics? I don't think you could write Blood type lyrics with this music. I personally love the lyrics and the song. That being said, Future Days is all Ed.harmless wrote:Oh, OK. Yeah I don't mind that so much as the few nods to the contemporary radio ballad. I don't know about Nickelback or top 40 country etc. but I do hear Take That / Gary Barlow or Robbie Williams in places. I think the song is great but it probably counts as something Ed would have never done at one point.Mine wrote:I had in mind the critics of Siren's being an 80's power ballad.harmless wrote:Mine wrote:It's accomplishment for them to be dated and contemporary at the same time, isn't it?harmless wrote:Well if you like. But just there you have:Mine wrote:Model role model....right?harmless wrote:There seems to be plenty of Ed quotes in which he said he'd never do something he's done since.
Vedder: And most bands, the longer they play together, they will become more comfortable. You go from punk-rock songs to contemporary music. It's a trap![]()
I... I don't know what you mean by that.
- Mine
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
We don't but if the vignette is an indication....jdopj wrote: You're right. We don't really know what Mike came in with and what (and who) it became. For me there are parts that I want to sing along loud to, but it is still missing that cliched hooky chorus. We were listening to 80's radio at work the other day, and Sirens does not remind me of Def Leppard.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
That's true, it does hold itself back. That's an old PJ trick, to take things only so far into cheesy territory but just hold back. This might be the furthest they've ever gone, but it's lacking that catchy chorus or any catchy musical hooks.jdopj wrote:You're right. We don't really know what Mike came in with and what (and who) it became. For me there are parts that I want to sing along loud to, but it is still missing that cliched hooky chorus. We were listening to 80's radio at work the other day, and Sirens does not remind me of Def Leppard.harmless wrote:Yeah but FD is just Ed. It's not remarkable but it doesn't sound like a boy band either. Sirens kind of does. As I said, I do like it a lot, I'm just pointing out that it touches on styles that Ed has said he never would, which was meant to be an amusing comment more than a serious one. I'm not sure the only possibilities were schlock love ballad or "Blood" either, not sure where that comes from. We don't really know where Mike's Pink Floyd ideas stop and BoB's radio-friendly rock ballad ideas start, but the song is a slightly jarring mix of both.jdopj wrote:But isn't this Mike's song with Ed's lyrics? I don't think you could write Blood type lyrics with this music. I personally love the lyrics and the song. That being said, Future Days is all Ed.harmless wrote:Oh, OK. Yeah I don't mind that so much as the few nods to the contemporary radio ballad. I don't know about Nickelback or top 40 country etc. but I do hear Take That / Gary Barlow or Robbie Williams in places. I think the song is great but it probably counts as something Ed would have never done at one point.Mine wrote:I had in mind the critics of Siren's being an 80's power ballad.harmless wrote:Mine wrote:It's accomplishment for them to be dated and contemporary at the same time, isn't it?harmless wrote:Well if you like. But just there you have:Mine wrote:Model role model....right?harmless wrote:There seems to be plenty of Ed quotes in which he said he'd never do something he's done since.
Vedder: And most bands, the longer they play together, they will become more comfortable. You go from punk-rock songs to contemporary music. It's a trap![]()
I... I don't know what you mean by that.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
-
jdopj
- Broken Tamborine
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 10:12 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
I was wondering this, are the vignettes stripped down portions of what the song became? Or the original riffs?Mine wrote:We don't but if the vignette is an indication....jdopj wrote: You're right. We don't really know what Mike came in with and what (and who) it became. For me there are parts that I want to sing along loud to, but it is still missing that cliched hooky chorus. We were listening to 80's radio at work the other day, and Sirens does not remind me of Def Leppard.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
- Mine
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
I checked that interview because i wanted context for that quote. I don't think he really implied PJ would never went there i think if anything he implied they might.harmless wrote:Oh, OK. Yeah I don't mind that so much as the few nods to the contemporary radio ballad. I don't know about Nickelback or top 40 country etc. but I do hear Take That / Gary Barlow or Robbie Williams in places. I think the song is great but it probably counts as something Ed would have never done at one point.Mine wrote:I had in mind the critics of Siren's being an 80's power ballad.harmless wrote:Mine wrote:It's accomplishment for them to be dated and contemporary at the same time, isn't it?harmless wrote:Well if you like. But just there you have:Mine wrote:Model role model....right?harmless wrote:There seems to be plenty of Ed quotes in which he said he'd never do something he's done since.
Vedder: And most bands, the longer they play together, they will become more comfortable. You go from punk-rock songs to contemporary music. It's a trap![]()
I... I don't know what you mean by that.
- Mine
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Sounds like the original riff to me and considering Mike is so proud of it i doubt it went anywhere he wouldn't want it to go.jdopj wrote:I was wondering this, are the vignettes stripped down portions of what the song became? Or the original riffs?Mine wrote:We don't but if the vignette is an indication....jdopj wrote: You're right. We don't really know what Mike came in with and what (and who) it became. For me there are parts that I want to sing along loud to, but it is still missing that cliched hooky chorus. We were listening to 80's radio at work the other day, and Sirens does not remind me of Def Leppard.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Guys, what Mike is playing on the vignette is exactly the same as what he's playing on the record. It's on a twelve-string. It might not sound clear because it's got piano over it, but I've compared them a few times and it's not different. It's the pre-chorus going into the first chorus that he plays.jdopj wrote:I was wondering this, are the vignettes stripped down portions of what the song became? Or the original riffs?Mine wrote:We don't but if the vignette is an indication....jdopj wrote: You're right. We don't really know what Mike came in with and what (and who) it became. For me there are parts that I want to sing along loud to, but it is still missing that cliched hooky chorus. We were listening to 80's radio at work the other day, and Sirens does not remind me of Def Leppard.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- Mine
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Ed's quote was about the way bands work or better put how band dynamics influence music not about his writing as an individual.jdopj wrote:But isn't this Mike's song with Ed's lyrics? I don't think you could write Blood type lyrics with this music. I personally love the lyrics and the song. That being said, Future Days is all Ed.harmless wrote:Oh, OK. Yeah I don't mind that so much as the few nods to the contemporary radio ballad. I don't know about Nickelback or top 40 country etc. but I do hear Take That / Gary Barlow or Robbie Williams in places. I think the song is great but it probably counts as something Ed would have never done at one point.Mine wrote:I had in mind the critics of Siren's being an 80's power ballad.harmless wrote:Mine wrote:It's accomplishment for them to be dated and contemporary at the same time, isn't it?harmless wrote:Well if you like. But just there you have:Mine wrote:Model role model....right?harmless wrote:There seems to be plenty of Ed quotes in which he said he'd never do something he's done since.
Vedder: And most bands, the longer they play together, they will become more comfortable. You go from punk-rock songs to contemporary music. It's a trap![]()
I... I don't know what you mean by that.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
No, we're talking about the LB vignettes on Youtube.dimejinky99 wrote:There was more than one vine?
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
It makes no difference. Ed was speaking about where bands go, not solo artists.Mine wrote:Ed's quote was about the way bands work or better put how band dynamics influence music not about his writing as an individual.jdopj wrote:But isn't this Mike's song with Ed's lyrics? I don't think you could write Blood type lyrics with this music. I personally love the lyrics and the song. That being said, Future Days is all Ed.harmless wrote:Oh, OK. Yeah I don't mind that so much as the few nods to the contemporary radio ballad. I don't know about Nickelback or top 40 country etc. but I do hear Take That / Gary Barlow or Robbie Williams in places. I think the song is great but it probably counts as something Ed would have never done at one point.Mine wrote:I had in mind the critics of Siren's being an 80's power ballad.harmless wrote:Mine wrote:It's accomplishment for them to be dated and contemporary at the same time, isn't it?harmless wrote:Well if you like. But just there you have:Mine wrote:Model role model....right?harmless wrote:There seems to be plenty of Ed quotes in which he said he'd never do something he's done since.
Vedder: And most bands, the longer they play together, they will become more comfortable. You go from punk-rock songs to contemporary music. It's a trap![]()
I... I don't know what you mean by that.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- Mine
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1833
- Joined: Wed April 03, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
That's my point responding to "but Sirens is Mike's" because it's not relevant in the given context.harmless wrote:It makes no difference. Ed was speaking about where bands go, not solo artists.Mine wrote:Ed's quote was about the way bands work or better put how band dynamics influence music not about his writing as an individual.jdopj wrote:But isn't this Mike's song with Ed's lyrics? I don't think you could write Blood type lyrics with this music. I personally love the lyrics and the song. That being said, Future Days is all Ed.harmless wrote:Oh, OK. Yeah I don't mind that so much as the few nods to the contemporary radio ballad. I don't know about Nickelback or top 40 country etc. but I do hear Take That / Gary Barlow or Robbie Williams in places. I think the song is great but it probably counts as something Ed would have never done at one point.Mine wrote:I had in mind the critics of Sirens being an 80's power ballad.harmless wrote:Mine wrote:It's accomplishment for them to be dated and contemporary at the same time, isn't it?harmless wrote:Well if you like. But just there you have:Mine wrote:Model role model....right?harmless wrote:There seems to be plenty of Ed quotes in which he said he'd never do something he's done since.
Vedder: And most bands, the longer they play together, they will become more comfortable. You go from punk-rock songs to contemporary music. It's a trap![]()
I... I don't know what you mean by that.
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
Ah, coolMine wrote:That's my point responding to "but Sirens is Mike's" because it's not relevant in the given context.harmless wrote:It makes no difference. Ed was speaking about where bands go, not solo artists.Mine wrote:Ed's quote was about the way bands work or better put how band dynamics influence music not about his writing as an individual.jdopj wrote:But isn't this Mike's song with Ed's lyrics? I don't think you could write Blood type lyrics with this music. I personally love the lyrics and the song. That being said, Future Days is all Ed.harmless wrote:Oh, OK. Yeah I don't mind that so much as the few nods to the contemporary radio ballad. I don't know about Nickelback or top 40 country etc. but I do hear Take That / Gary Barlow or Robbie Williams in places. I think the song is great but it probably counts as something Ed would have never done at one point.Mine wrote:I had in mind the critics of Sirens being an 80's power ballad.harmless wrote:Mine wrote:It's accomplishment for them to be dated and contemporary at the same time, isn't it?harmless wrote:Well if you like. But just there you have:Mine wrote:Model role model....right?harmless wrote:There seems to be plenty of Ed quotes in which he said he'd never do something he's done since.
Vedder: And most bands, the longer they play together, they will become more comfortable. You go from punk-rock songs to contemporary music. It's a trap![]()
I... I don't know what you mean by that.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- dimejinky99
- what on earth am I talking about
- Posts: 39789
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 12:35 am
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
The vignettes were an excellent way to build excitement and pitched perfectly at the target audience. Who else is really gonna care to watch them?
But I wouldn't be taking any cues from them about the finished music really at all
But I wouldn't be taking any cues from them about the finished music really at all
Calibrate your enthusiasm
- stip
- The worst
- Posts: 42946
- Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm
Re: New Song (9.19.13): Sirens
i may go watch that infallible vignette again.
I Am No Guide - Pearl Jam Song by Song - Out now!
He/Him/His
He/Him/His