Might you say he "fixed them"?McParadigm wrote:I dislike this rule quite a bit. It encourages you to think of songs as one person's or the others, and McCartney was very influential on the final result of a lot of Lennon's 66-67 and Abbey Road songs.durdencommatyler wrote:Lennon/McCartney share writing credits, but wrote a lot independently. The best rule of thumb is: the person singing the song is the primary songwiter.
And We Are All Together / The Beatles Thread
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: The Beatles
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: The Beatles
In the opposite way Ed fixed Fixer, yeah.harmless wrote:Might you say he "fixed them"?McParadigm wrote:I dislike this rule quite a bit. It encourages you to think of songs as one person's or the others, and McCartney was very influential on the final result of a lot of Lennon's 66-67 and Abbey Road songs.durdencommatyler wrote:Lennon/McCartney share writing credits, but wrote a lot independently. The best rule of thumb is: the person singing the song is the primary songwiter.
(patriotic choking noises)
- harmless
- 10Club Complaint Department
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:41 pm
Re: The Beatles
McParadigm wrote:In the opposite way Ed fixed Fixer, yeah.harmless wrote:Might you say he "fixed them"?McParadigm wrote:I dislike this rule quite a bit. It encourages you to think of songs as one person's or the others, and McCartney was very influential on the final result of a lot of Lennon's 66-67 and Abbey Road songs.durdencommatyler wrote:Lennon/McCartney share writing credits, but wrote a lot independently. The best rule of thumb is: the person singing the song is the primary songwiter.
RisingTides wrote:There is more kindness on the internet than we would care to admit to ourselves. Sometimes we are so afraid of falling victim to a ruse, we miss out on actual opportunities.
- Ledbetterman10
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Thu April 04, 2013 10:08 pm
- Contact:
Re: The Beatles
Paul was always more influential on John's songs that John was on his. I think this might be because John didn't care as much about Paul's tunes. Whatever Paul wants to do, let him do it. Paul on the other hand was all about making any Beatles song as good as it can be...regardless if he wrote it or not. Paul's influence on some of John's songs like Tomorrow Never Knows (created the tape loops), A Day In The Life ("conducts" the orchestra, wrote the middle section), and Strawberry Fields (plays the mellotron) can't be understated. Not to mention all the times Paul played lead guitar because he's simply better than George (Taxman, Good Morning Good Morning, USSR among others) Aside from suggesting use of brass in Mother Nature's Son and suggesting not changing a Hey Jude lyric, John really didn't give much creative input to Paul...at least as far as I know.McParadigm wrote:I dislike this rule quite a bit. It encourages you to think of songs as one person's or the others, and McCartney was very influential on the final result of a lot of Lennon's 66-67 and Abbey Road songs.durdencommatyler wrote:Lennon/McCartney share writing credits, but wrote a lot independently. The best rule of thumb is: the person singing the song is the primary songwiter.
One last thought: You know what song is most telling of Paul's obsession with making great Beatles records? The Ballad Of John & Yoko. Think about it. Paul very much disliked Yoko during this period. Why would he ever want to play piano, bass, and drums on a tune that's all about John's love for Yoko? Cause it's a good tune. That's all Paul cares about. George has been quoted saying that he'd have shown up for the session if it was called The Ballad of John, Yoko, and George. But Paul? If you got a tune that needs recording, he'll be there.
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: The Beatles
I've always thought Paul's best works on the bass were for John and George's songs.
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: The Beatles
I can see that. In addition to the above (Paul wrote the chorus to A Day... as well) being true, I think Paul was more comfortable experimenting and trying strange things on other people's stuff because it involved little personal risk. With his own songs, he wanted them to "pop" so big that he couldn't do the cool stuff. Hence the majority of his solo output.numbers wrote:I've always thought Paul's best works on the bass were for John and George's songs.
Also, for slowing it way down to a groove and coming up with those great bass and keyboard parts that redefined it, I see Come Together as being as much a Paul song as a John one.
(patriotic choking noises)
- numbers
- Mind Your Tanners
- Posts: 9200
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:44 pm
- Location: Franklin, MA
Re: The Beatles
Though my favorite bass on a Beatles song is probably old brown shoe, and I think George played that himself.
-
Harry Lime
- Future Drummer
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 7:52 pm
Re: The Beatles
"Revolver"
My favorites list:
1. I Want to Tell You
2. I'm Only Sleeping
3. Love You To
4. She Said She Said
5. Tomorrow Never Knows
6. And Your Bird Can Sing
7. Taxman
8. Dr. Robert
9. Here, There And Everywhere
10. Rigby
11. For No One
12. Good Day Sunshine
13. Got to Get You Into My Life
14. Yellow Submarine (get off the album please!)
Next: Rubber Soul
My favorites list:
1. I Want to Tell You
2. I'm Only Sleeping
3. Love You To
4. She Said She Said
5. Tomorrow Never Knows
6. And Your Bird Can Sing
7. Taxman
8. Dr. Robert
9. Here, There And Everywhere
10. Rigby
11. For No One
12. Good Day Sunshine
13. Got to Get You Into My Life
14. Yellow Submarine (get off the album please!)
Next: Rubber Soul
- flannelking
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Sat August 31, 2013 10:27 pm
- Location: The deepest part of a forest in Washington which is closest to Seattle. Or central Illinois.
Re: The Beatles
Hello. I'm an aspiring Pearl Jam snob. I was told I could come to this forum for training! I like The Beatles. I could see the opening statement maybe being a solid argument if "best band" could be decided strictly on who had the better melodies, though it would be a close contest. Best melodies couldn't be determined though. Anyway, Pearl Jam have them beat in most other areas, it seems.zeb wrote:I can't believe that we don't have a thread on The Beatles! Best band ever!
- epilogue
- We All We Got, We All We Need
- Posts: 84850
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
- Location: Ghorman
- Contact:
Re: The Beatles
Welcome!flannelking wrote:Hello. I'm an aspiring Pearl Jam snob. I was told I could come to this forum for training! I like The Beatles. I could see the opening statement maybe being a solid argument if "best band" could be decided strictly on who had the better melodies, though it would be a close contest. Best melodies couldn't be determined though. Anyway, Pearl Jam have them beat in most other areas, it seems.zeb wrote:I can't believe that we don't have a thread on The Beatles! Best band ever!
And, you know, opinions and assholes and all that, but....
- malice
- post-structuralist
- Posts: 4377
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm
- Location: faked by jorge
Re: The Beatles
and they're bigger than god, too.flannelking wrote:Hello. I'm an aspiring Pearl Jam snob. I was told I could come to this forum for training! I like The Beatles. I could see the opening statement maybe being a solid argument if "best band" could be decided strictly on who had the better melodies, though it would be a close contest. Best melodies couldn't be determined though. Anyway, Pearl Jam have them beat in most other areas, it seems.zeb wrote:I can't believe that we don't have a thread on The Beatles! Best band ever!
the beatles were only bigger than rod.
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
- Spoiler: show
- McParadigm
- NEVER STOP JAMMING!
- Posts: 22393
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am
Re: The Beatles
It really becomes most evident in the 2002-era Pearl Jam photo shoots, I think.malice wrote:and they're bigger than god, too.
the beatles were only bigger than rod.

(patriotic choking noises)
- malice
- post-structuralist
- Posts: 4377
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm
- Location: faked by jorge
Re: The Beatles
*zod
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
- Spoiler: show
- flannelking
- A Return To Form
- Posts: 123
- Joined: Sat August 31, 2013 10:27 pm
- Location: The deepest part of a forest in Washington which is closest to Seattle. Or central Illinois.
Re: The Beatles
malice wrote:and they're bigger than god, too.flannelking wrote:Hello. I'm an aspiring Pearl Jam snob. I was told I could come to this forum for training! I like The Beatles. I could see the opening statement maybe being a solid argument if "best band" could be decided strictly on who had the better melodies, though it would be a close contest. Best melodies couldn't be determined though. Anyway, Pearl Jam have them beat in most other areas, it seems.zeb wrote:I can't believe that we don't have a thread on The Beatles! Best band ever!
the beatles were only bigger than rod.
haha, and the most popular religion in india is hinduism... Is it safe to say the popularity of The Beatles in the early period was due to moist panties much more than real talent, especially judging by today's (the talent we can look back on through the years) standards?
- malice
- post-structuralist
- Posts: 4377
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm
- Location: faked by jorge
Re: The Beatles
I truly wish I understood this post. but to answer your question, the part I understand, I'm pretty sure the musical talent we can look back through the years at wouldnt exist were it not for the Beatlesflannelking wrote:malice wrote:and they're bigger than god, too.flannelking wrote:Hello. I'm an aspiring Pearl Jam snob. I was told I could come to this forum for training! I like The Beatles. I could see the opening statement maybe being a solid argument if "best band" could be decided strictly on who had the better melodies, though it would be a close contest. Best melodies couldn't be determined though. Anyway, Pearl Jam have them beat in most other areas, it seems.zeb wrote:I can't believe that we don't have a thread on The Beatles! Best band ever!
the beatles were only bigger than rod.
haha, and the most popular religion in india is hinduism... Is it safe to say the popularity of The Beatles in the early period was due to moist panties much more than real talent, especially judging by today's (the talent we can look back on through the years) standards?
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
- Spoiler: show
- Soma.
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1362
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:17 pm
- Location: On a live wire right up off the street.
Re: The Beatles
So what do we think of this flannelking guy? Is he too obvious or just the right amount of ridiculous?
Self wrote:Every time I get to be a bachelor, I order Chinese. Twice a year, I gorge on broccoli 'n beef and crab rangoons. The guilt reminds me of masturbation. So does the rice.
- Jorge
- NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
- Posts: 36490
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
- Location: Buenos Aires
Re: The Beatles
My vote for Best Comedy Account 2013 goes to flannelking.
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
- malice
- post-structuralist
- Posts: 4377
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:22 pm
- Location: faked by jorge
Re: The Beatles
can i vote for just plain dumb?Soma. wrote:So what do we think of this flannelking guy? Is he too obvious or just the right amount of ridiculous?
Dev wrote:you're delusional. you are a sad sad person. fuck off. you're mentally ill beyond repair. i don't need your shit. dissapear.
- Spoiler: show
- Bob Loblaw
- likes rhythmic things that butt up against each other
- Posts: 936
- Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:05 pm
- Location: Montreal, QC
- Contact:
Re: The Beatles
flannelking wrote:Hello. I'm an aspiring Pearl Jam snob. I was told I could come to this forum for training! I like The Beatles. I could see the opening statement maybe being a solid argument if "best band" could be decided strictly on who had the better melodies, though it would be a close contest. Best melodies couldn't be determined though. Anyway, Pearl Jam have them beat in most other areas, it seems.zeb wrote:I can't believe that we don't have a thread on The Beatles! Best band ever!
chud wrote:Posting! Glorious posting!
- Soma.
- AnalLog
- Posts: 1362
- Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 1:17 pm
- Location: On a live wire right up off the street.
Re: The Beatles
That is precisely what he wants, Mary. Never engage a Flannel King on his terms.
Self wrote:Every time I get to be a bachelor, I order Chinese. Twice a year, I gorge on broccoli 'n beef and crab rangoons. The guilt reminds me of masturbation. So does the rice.