march madness 2022

General Pearl Jam discussion.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

march madness 2022

Post by stip »

It's January, which means it's a new year and time to start planning this year's march madness. I am leaning towards a totally randomized tournament, where every round all surviving songs are reshuffled so anything could go up against anything in a given round (single elimination, though). Thoughts?


likewise, should I cut the demos and songs we know are going nowhere, or aim for completion? I'll remove the Eddie solo songs. The random seeding should (I think) help balance out the tournament so I don't need to worry about maintaining a certain number
User avatar
Anders
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 23452
Joined: Fri July 12, 2013 9:11 pm
Twitter: https://twitter.com/lowenan
Location: Oslo, Norway

Re: march madness 2022

Post by Anders »

Sounds great. Cut demos, but keep all album songs.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51634
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: march madness 2022

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 01, 2026 11:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
dad
Posting (live)
Posts: 19163
Joined: Fri June 24, 2016 2:49 pm

Re: march madness 2022

Post by dad »

maybe Olympic Platinum will finally have its day.
96583UP wrote:i recently bought travel-size packets of metamucil

now when i regular i can promote regularity
User avatar
CopperTom
Champion of RM
Posts: 10760
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:19 pm
Location: Northeastern Pennsylvania

Re: march madness 2022

Post by CopperTom »

I've said this before, all matchups should be 3 songs (or more). It would speed things along too. Seems like this would be suited for a bracketless March Madness.
emanon wrote:I think I either need to drink less to become more alert, or more so as not to care.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: march madness 2022

Post by Norah »

both trag and coppertom have great ideas
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: march madness 2022

Post by Bammer »

tragabigzanda wrote:For the love god, let's retire the past winners. Stick them in the HOF and let some other material drive the discussions.
Yes
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
epilogue
We All We Got, We All We Need
Posts: 84850
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:33 pm
Location: Ghorman
Contact:

Re: march madness 2022

Post by epilogue »

No
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22777
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: march madness 2022

Post by Bammer »

Double yes
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: march madness 2022

Post by Norah »

How about everyone submits a list of ten Pearl Jam songs, ranked. First place gets 10 points, second place gets 9 points...tenth place gets 1 point.

The top 64 songs by points are put in a tournament.
User avatar
washing machine
10Club Complaint Department
Posts: 15666
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 11:28 pm
Location: Space City

Re: march madness 2022

Post by washing machine »

1. man of the hour
2. yellow moon
3. of the girl
4. rise
5. cropduster
6. low light
7. habit
8. rival
9. take the long way home
10. brain of j.
dimejinky99 wrote:I could destroy any ai chatbot you put in front of me. Easily.
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: march madness 2022

Post by stip »

CopperTom wrote:I've said this before, all matchups should be 3 songs (or more). It would speed things along too. Seems like this would be suited for a bracketless March Madness.
Ohhh, I like this idea, at least for the first two rounds. We'll move quicker and we might get some exciting matchups with an unlucky draw. I do want to keep the past winners in, though.


I'm backing Rearviewmirror or Dance this year. Those are the two PJ songs that have meant the most to me in the past year
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: march madness 2022

Post by Kevin Davis »

stip wrote:I do want to keep the past winners in, though.
Anything to keep "In the Moonlight"'s chances down, huh?
User avatar
Jaeti
Future Drummer
Posts: 2641
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: march madness 2022

Post by Jaeti »

CopperTom wrote:I've said this before, all matchups should be 3 songs (or more). It would speed things along too. Seems like this would be suited for a bracketless March Madness.
:thumbsup:
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: march madness 2022

Post by stip »

Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote:I do want to keep the past winners in, though.
Anything to keep "In the Moonlight"'s chances down, huh?
that's one of those demo songs I figured we'd just cut.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22220
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: march madness 2022

Post by bodysnatcher »

Let’s just get this over quickly and only submit the 5 or 6 songs that always win
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10374
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: march madness 2022

Post by liebzz »

I say embrace and enjoy. We’ve done this a lot of times but I always find joy in this exercise every year- I say go full on, and Safe in the Car needs better positioning so it can advance this year!
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9312
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: march madness 2022

Post by Kevin Davis »

stip wrote:
Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote:I do want to keep the past winners in, though.
Anything to keep "In the Moonlight"'s chances down, huh?
that's one of those demo songs I figured we'd just cut.
Stip, I don't mean to share the contents of our PM exchange, but I think this post might be confusing to some of the other RM'ers. It turns out, Stip had been listening to the low quality mp3 of the Matt Cameron MySpace demo of "In the Moonlight" all this time, thinking that was the finished version of the song that Joey and I and others have expressed enthusiasm for so often over the years, hence his characterization of the song as a "demo" in the post quoted above. However, upon directing his attention to the "definitive Pearl Jam songs/versions" thread that he himself helped create, he now understands that there is an official studio version of this song, which he has listened to several times and thinks is -- and I quote -- "pretty incredible really, a masterful confluence of mood, texture, and imagery, and probably better than 2/3 of the songs on Vitalogy."

A proper write-up is forthcoming apparently, of this new-to-him Pearl Jam song of whose existence he was only partially aware, but rest assured the song WILL feature in the MM tournament this year.
User avatar
Norah
Poster of the Year
Posts: 37327
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 2:04 pm
Location: September 2020 Poster of the Month

Re: march madness 2022

Post by Norah »

Wow, can't wait to read it, stip.
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10374
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: march madness 2022

Post by liebzz »

Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote:
Kevin Davis wrote:
stip wrote:I do want to keep the past winners in, though.
Anything to keep "In the Moonlight"'s chances down, huh?
that's one of those demo songs I figured we'd just cut.
Stip, I don't mean to share the contents of our PM exchange, but I think this post might be confusing to some of the other RM'ers. It turns out, Stip had been listening to the low quality mp3 of the Matt Cameron MySpace demo of "In the Moonlight" all this time, thinking that was the finished version of the song that Joey and I and others have expressed enthusiasm for so often over the years, hence his characterization of the song as a "demo" in the post quoted above. However, upon directing his attention to the "definitive Pearl Jam songs/versions" thread that he himself helped create, he now understands that there is an official studio version of this song, which he has listened to several times and thinks is -- and I quote -- "pretty incredible really, a masterful confluence of mood, texture, and imagery, and probably better than 2/3 of the songs on Vitalogy."

A proper write-up is forthcoming apparently, of this new-to-him Pearl Jam song of whose existence he was only partially aware, but rest assured the song WILL feature in the MM tournament this year.
I am confused. Is this not on Lost Dogs?
Post Reply