Eddie Vedder - Earthling

When a band is but a fraction of Pearl Jam, but they aren't zero Pearl Jam.
Post Reply

I would give Earthling

5 stars
12
11%
4 stars
59
52%
3 stars
24
21%
2 stars
9
8%
1 star
4
4%
0 stars
5
4%
 
Total votes: 113

User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22296
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by bodysnatcher »

tragabigzanda wrote:
Jorge wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:if nothing else, you can hear the effort poured into The Haves.
Where?!?
he's working really hard just to keep the whole idea together!
and working hard to destroy his legacy
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by McParadigm »

Gotta be honest: I am 1000% less repulsed by solo career suckage than I am when the band does something that sucks.

I mean, I expect Eddie Vedder solo to be worse than Pearl Jam. It would be a pretty big slight to the other members if that wasn’t so. So the other reason I favor The Haves in this case is probably that at least it isn’t now and forever a part of the Pearl Jam song set.

That’s pretty stupid but it’s still true
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by evenslow »

No, that's right, the stakes are lower. Grade the solo career on a curve.

But don't write The Haves. And don't put it on an album. And, please (please) don't release it as a single. Also, please don't play it live in concert.
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
McParadigm
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22393
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 1:56 am

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by McParadigm »

The new song sucks…
Image

…and it’s on a solo project
Image
(patriotic choking noises)
User avatar
Jaeti
Future Drummer
Posts: 2642
Joined: Mon July 08, 2013 5:47 pm

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by Jaeti »

McParadigm wrote:Gotta be honest: I am 1000% less repulsed by solo career suckage than I am when the band does something that sucks.

I mean, I expect Eddie Vedder solo to be worse than Pearl Jam. It would be a pretty big slight to the other members if that wasn’t so. So the other reason I favor The Haves in this case is probably that at least it isn’t now and forever a part of the Pearl Jam song set.

That’s pretty stupid but it’s still true
Yeah, this. The Haves (and perhaps most of Earthling TBD), coming after Gigaton, of course makes me nervous about what the next Pearl Jam record might be like if Ed and his new producer steer things too much. But CDM was literally Pearl Jam proper. They all got together and recorded it and decided it was going onto an album and should be released to the world. No comparison.
User avatar
evenslow
Stone's Bitch
Posts: 9164
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:47 pm
Location: unnamed mental hospital

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by evenslow »

Jaeti wrote:
McParadigm wrote:Gotta be honest: I am 1000% less repulsed by solo career suckage than I am when the band does something that sucks.

I mean, I expect Eddie Vedder solo to be worse than Pearl Jam. It would be a pretty big slight to the other members if that wasn’t so. So the other reason I favor The Haves in this case is probably that at least it isn’t now and forever a part of the Pearl Jam song set.

That’s pretty stupid but it’s still true
Yeah, this. The Haves (and perhaps most of Earthling TBD), coming after Gigaton, of course makes me nervous about what the next Pearl Jam record might be like if Ed and his new producer steer things too much. But CDM was literally Pearl Jam proper. They all got together and recorded it and decided it was going onto an album and should be released to the world. No comparison.
Theoretically, this is true, but I would bet the farm that Ed was 100% the leading factor behind the CDM greenlight. Thought they were making a big political statement and it needed to get out. The rest of the band shrugged and/or said "Sure?"
Strat wrote:Alas, we are RM
User avatar
Leatherhead
Rank This Poster
Posts: 4290
Joined: Fri August 09, 2013 4:38 am

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by Leatherhead »

Think Josh Evans is pissed about this Andrew Watt news?
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by tragabigzanda »

pearl jam sucks now
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Tue January 06, 2026 8:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
bodysnatcher
NEVER STOP JAMMING!
Posts: 22296
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 11:15 pm
Location: the bathroom

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by bodysnatcher »

tragabigzanda wrote:
Leatherhead wrote:Think Josh Evans is pissed about this Andrew Watt news?
I’m super curious to know what Jeff thinks about it
Probably doesn’t even know about it
User avatar
BurtReynolds
An enigma of a man shaped hole in the wall between reality and the soul of the devil.
Posts: 46239
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:13 pm
Location: 6000 feet beyond man and time.

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by BurtReynolds »

Jorge wrote:
tragabigzanda wrote:if nothing else, you can hear the effort poured into The Haves.
Where?!?
In the millions of extra syllables he injects into every word.
RM's resident disinformation expert.
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36758
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by Jorge »

I bet Ed talks the band into performing "The Haves" live at some point
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
spike
The Master
Posts: 35959
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 4:18 am

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by spike »

Jorge wrote:I bet Ed talks the band into performing "The Haves" live at some point
He won’t have to… Mike already thinks it’s the best thing Ed has ever done.
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10612
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by liebzz »

The issue is that Ed’s solo work bleeds into the main catalogue. Like an introduction of sorts. Tulumne becomes Just Breathe. Sleeping By Myself becomes well Sleeping By Myself. If he’s going to be a on a totally different plain then sure. Hopefully they keep it out of the Pearl Jam catalogue.
User avatar
Tsuga
A Return To Form
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed January 22, 2020 3:11 pm
Location: Vermont

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by Tsuga »

From today on The AV Club:

"For his first solo album in more than a decade (since 2011’s Ukulele Songs), Pearl Jam frontman Eddie Vedder has made an album that tackles as many different genres and styles as the singer has explored throughout his career. That means going from tracks that sound almost exactly like contemporary Pearl Jam rockers (“Brother The Cloud”) to Coldplay-like anthems (opener “Invincible”), to ’80s-pop stompers (“The Dark”), punked-up bangers (“Good And Evil”), and a few versions of the agreeably mid-tempo adult-contemporary ballads that have been Vedder’s forte for awhile now. With guests as varied as Stevie Wonder and Ringo Starr, the album may sacrifice consistency for eclecticism, but it contains some hidden gems." [Alex McLevy]
'Hold me close,' cooed the dove, who was stuffed now with sawdust and diamonds. - Joanna Newsom
User avatar
stip
The worst
Posts: 42946
Joined: Thu December 13, 2012 6:31 pm

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by stip »

McParadigm wrote:Gotta be honest: I am 1000% less repulsed by solo career suckage than I am when the band does something that sucks.

I mean, I expect Eddie Vedder solo to be worse than Pearl Jam. It would be a pretty big slight to the other members if that wasn’t so. So the other reason I favor The Haves in this case is probably that at least it isn’t now and forever a part of the Pearl Jam song set.

That’s pretty stupid but it’s still true
thats 100% true for me as well. Eddie’s solo output is extremely hit or miss, but I never feel more than a vauge disappointment that I didnt get a better song. I am so much more invested in anything canonically labeled pearl jam
User avatar
Jorge
NYUCK NYUCK NYUCK
Posts: 36758
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 3:35 pm
Location: Buenos Aires

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by Jorge »

I am not invested in the overall quality of PJ's catalogue anymore so I can't relate. Whether it's "Out of Sand" or "Can't Deny Me" I tend to just judge the songs as songs
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43421
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by VinylGuy »

stip wrote:
McParadigm wrote:Gotta be honest: I am 1000% less repulsed by solo career suckage than I am when the band does something that sucks.

I mean, I expect Eddie Vedder solo to be worse than Pearl Jam. It would be a pretty big slight to the other members if that wasn’t so. So the other reason I favor The Haves in this case is probably that at least it isn’t now and forever a part of the Pearl Jam song set.

That’s pretty stupid but it’s still true
thats 100% true for me as well. Eddie’s solo output is extremely hit or miss, but I never feel more than a vauge disappointment that I didnt get a better song. I am so much more invested in anything canonically labeled pearl jam
yeah, i agree with this. Ed's solo career is, sometimes, a fun outlier for some new related stuff from the band for me. but the real stuff is what happens in Pearl Jam.

Even as a band related project, his solo career would rank in 4th or 5th place.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
liebzz
I've been POOSSTTIiiEEnngeeaahh
Posts: 10612
Joined: Thu January 03, 2013 7:55 pm

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by liebzz »

VinylGuy wrote:
stip wrote:
McParadigm wrote:Gotta be honest: I am 1000% less repulsed by solo career suckage than I am when the band does something that sucks.

I mean, I expect Eddie Vedder solo to be worse than Pearl Jam. It would be a pretty big slight to the other members if that wasn’t so. So the other reason I favor The Haves in this case is probably that at least it isn’t now and forever a part of the Pearl Jam song set.

That’s pretty stupid but it’s still true
thats 100% true for me as well. Eddie’s solo output is extremely hit or miss, but I never feel more than a vauge disappointment that I didnt get a better song. I am so much more invested in anything canonically labeled pearl jam
yeah, i agree with this. Ed's solo career is, sometimes, a fun outlier for some new related stuff from the band for me. but the real stuff is what happens in Pearl Jam.

Even as a band related project, his solo career would rank in 4th or 5th place.
I mean, it’s presented less as an outlier than his other projects - some of which I felt were fantastic:

Into the Wild - movie soundtrack is excuse as outlier, but otherwise an A album for me

Ukulele Songs - songs with predominantly only a ukulele and reads more like a compilation of sorts than a proper album, but solid B for me otherwise.

Flag Day - movie soundtrack with collaborators which is also a solid B outing overall for me.

Earthling - sounds like first full effort to be a solo album proper, though with a full backing band. TBD.

I think his output as a solo artist probably about even for me with Jeff Ament’s, but neither can top those two Stone Gossard albums that I love both. If we are including side bands, I would take Mad Season, RNDM and Painted Shield over Ed solo, but I am not sure about any others (unless you count Temple of the Dog which blows all of this away at least for me).
User avatar
Kevin Davis
tl;dr
Posts: 9317
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 6:06 pm

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by Kevin Davis »

Jorge wrote:I am not invested in the overall quality of PJ's catalogue anymore so I can't relate. Whether it's "Out of Sand" or "Can't Deny Me" I tend to just judge the songs as songs
I agree with this to a point, but EV solo tracks just register with such little significance to me -- I feel like there have been so many of them over the past 10 years, and they've all just gone in one ear and out the other. We're all raking "The Haves" across the coals, but if I'm honest it doesn't really feel that much worse to me than most of what he's been peddling since 2012, and that includes EV-centric PJ songs like "Future Days" and "River Cross," as well as PJ-leaning EV songs like "Brother the Cloud." All of it is more or less the same to me; his writing style, his musical sensibilities, when given center stage, all equalize for me in roughly the same generally unremarkable space. Little things about each song that may seem especially egregious (i.e. comparing his partner to a siamese twin, Ghostbusters references, etc.) just register as momentary spikes on an otherwise flatlining monitor.

I still, and probably always will, listen to new PJ music with curious ears, and sometimes a "Buckle Up" or a "Take the Long Way" or a "Get It Back" still manages to surprise and delight me. If not, no big deal. But even with tempered expectations, I always look forward to seeing what they come up with.

FWIW, I think the EV song that I still find the most ludicrous is his rewrite of Phil Ochs's "Here's to the State of Mississippi." The ultra-literal, artless zenith of his "three chords and the truth" phase.
User avatar
VinylGuy
jeeeesus relax already
Posts: 43421
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: Eddie Vedder - Earthling

Post by VinylGuy »

liebzz wrote:
VinylGuy wrote:
stip wrote:
McParadigm wrote:Gotta be honest: I am 1000% less repulsed by solo career suckage than I am when the band does something that sucks.

I mean, I expect Eddie Vedder solo to be worse than Pearl Jam. It would be a pretty big slight to the other members if that wasn’t so. So the other reason I favor The Haves in this case is probably that at least it isn’t now and forever a part of the Pearl Jam song set.

That’s pretty stupid but it’s still true
thats 100% true for me as well. Eddie’s solo output is extremely hit or miss, but I never feel more than a vauge disappointment that I didnt get a better song. I am so much more invested in anything canonically labeled pearl jam
yeah, i agree with this. Ed's solo career is, sometimes, a fun outlier for some new related stuff from the band for me. but the real stuff is what happens in Pearl Jam.

Even as a band related project, his solo career would rank in 4th or 5th place.
I mean, it’s presented less as an outlier than his other projects - some of which I felt were fantastic:

Into the Wild - movie soundtrack is excuse as outlier, but otherwise an A album for me

Ukulele Songs - songs with predominantly only a ukulele and reads more like a compilation of sorts than a proper album, but solid B for me otherwise.

Flag Day - movie soundtrack with collaborators which is also a solid B outing overall for me.

Earthling - sounds like first full effort to be a solo album proper, though with a full backing band. TBD.

I think his output as a solo artist probably about even for me with Jeff Ament’s, but neither can top those two Stone Gossard albums that I love both. If we are including side bands, I would take Mad Season, RNDM and Painted Shield over Ed solo, but I am not sure about any others (unless you count Temple of the Dog which blows all of this away at least for me).
For me ITW is his best album, and a really great one on itself. Ukelele Songs...i prefer Uke songs. Those demos were cooler. But it was what it was, a nice experiment.

Flag Day feels more like a collaborative effort, and a nice one too.

I prefer Stone and Jeff solo albums. And as a side project its behind them and Temple Of The Dog, Mad Season, Brad and RNDM for sure.
BONE FUCKIN´ TOMAHAWK.
Post Reply