Correct. Also for every English dish that is even remotely appetizing there's something they've given a truly horrid name like "mushy peas"
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Ate really well the one time I was in Chile but on a global scale Chilean food is unremarkable (especially since pisco and ceviche are Peruvian).
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Same goes for Uruguay. Amazing meals, had a pound-for-pound better dining experience in Montevideo than in BsAs, but very little that would make you say "that's Uruguayan for sure!"
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
Mickey wrote:Same goes for Uruguay. Amazing meals, had a pound-for-pound better dining experience in Montevideo than in BsAs, but very little that would make you say "that's Uruguayan for sure!"
There's chivito Uruguayo which I love but generally yes
Anders wrote:I do not have a «neoliberal assessment of geopolitics», so please stop writing that I do.
Maple syrup and gravy are essential elements. When one thinks of diners, one thinks of lunch counters, booths, a casual atmosphere, inexpensive food, long hours, breakfast all day, a relatively standard menu of classic American fare like burgers and fries and milkshakes and pies. There are variations, like the Greek diner, that exist because the form of the diner is unpretentious and allows variation. Some diners lean hard into the fifties aesthetic that is present in all diners. Stainless steel siding for some reason.