The Supreme Court

Engage in discussions about news, politics, etc.
Post Reply
simple schoolboy
Misplaced My Sponge
Posts: 5934
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 3:41 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by simple schoolboy »

BurtReynolds wrote:
4/5 wrote:Biden has pledged to nominate a black woman to replace Breyer.
Rachel Dolezal set to make history.
It'dq be a good way to resolve the Kamala Harris issue.
User avatar
tragabigzanda
Production Police
Posts: 51690
Joined: Tue September 24, 2013 5:56 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by tragabigzanda »

FUCK ICE
Last edited by tragabigzanda on Thu January 15, 2026 3:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25047
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

4/5 wrote:Why not B?
Why not 7 Justices?
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Mickey »

tragabigzanda wrote:
I hate lesser evil voting but I continue to do it. Mitt Romney would break me though.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Mickey »

I mean this is obviously fucking farce and is never going to happen but the way the media class pines for a unity ticket is so funny, considering it's probably the one thing the Democrats could do to make me give up entirely.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Mickey »

Anyway by 2024 I hope to be solidly across the northern border and will immediately pivot to being a "BUILD THAT WALL" guy, so perhaps it's immaterial.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25047
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

:lol:
Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Mickey »

It would be peak Democrat to wait on this in order to try to make the midterm election a referendum on the Supreme Court and then eat shit anyway.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
elliseamos
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 8900
Joined: Thu January 10, 2013 2:19 am
Location: SOUTH PORTLAND

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by elliseamos »

F that! Didn't ACB take like 27 days?!

Michelle Obama to the court for the win!
User avatar
surfndestroy
Future Drummer
Posts: 2870
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 2:21 am

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by surfndestroy »

tragabigzanda wrote:
And I thought I did good drugs.
Think I’m going to try being kind to everyone a chance.
User avatar
B
Troglodyte
Posts: 25047
Joined: Wed December 19, 2012 9:53 pm
Twitter: https://bsky.app/profile/rectormsw.bsky.social
Location: Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by B »

Everything's perfectly all right now. We're fine. We're all fine here, now, thank you. How are you?
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Mickey »

The guiding assumption of that tweet is that no one who reads it listens to the audio.
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
Mickey
Mind Your Tanners
Posts: 9715
Joined: Wed January 02, 2013 6:02 am
Location: Tristes Tropiques

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Mickey »

Women be questionin' though!
VinylGuy wrote:its really tiresome to see these ¨good guys¨ talking about any political stuff in tv while also being kinda funny and hip and cool....its just...please enough of this shit.
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 4/5 »

Mickey wrote:The guiding assumption of that tweet is that no one who reads it listens to the audio.
And that the audio hasn't always been available anyway. Now it's just live.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22815
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bammer »

elliseamos wrote:F that! Didn't ACB take like 27 days?!

Michelle Obama to the court for the win!
I honestly don’t know so I am asking: Does Michelle Obama have the requisite law degree or whatever other qualifications are necessary?

(I have no idea what qualifications are necessary)
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21687
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Simple Torture »

Bammer wrote:
elliseamos wrote:F that! Didn't ACB take like 27 days?!

Michelle Obama to the court for the win!
I honestly don’t know so I am asking: Does Michelle Obama have the requisite law degree or whatever other qualifications are necessary?

(I have no idea what qualifications are necessary)
I believe that technically no qualifications are necessary.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Bammer
mXn
Posts: 22815
Joined: Thu January 24, 2013 4:32 am
Location: Surrounded by Wokes. Please send help.

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Bammer »

Simple Torture wrote:
Bammer wrote:
elliseamos wrote:F that! Didn't ACB take like 27 days?!

Michelle Obama to the court for the win!
I honestly don’t know so I am asking: Does Michelle Obama have the requisite law degree or whatever other qualifications are necessary?

(I have no idea what qualifications are necessary)
I believe that technically no qualifications are necessary.
Wow, now that is really something.
(she/him/theirs)
User avatar
4/5
See you in another life, brother
Posts: 6989
Joined: Thu December 20, 2012 4:45 pm

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by 4/5 »

Bammer wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
Bammer wrote:
elliseamos wrote:F that! Didn't ACB take like 27 days?!

Michelle Obama to the court for the win!
I honestly don’t know so I am asking: Does Michelle Obama have the requisite law degree or whatever other qualifications are necessary?

(I have no idea what qualifications are necessary)
I believe that technically no qualifications are necessary.
Wow, now that is really something.
The qualification is that a president nominates you and the Senate confirms. Unless the Senate is recessed, in which case the only requirement is that the president nominates you.
"I want to see the whole picture--as nearly as I can. I don't want to put on the blinders of 'good and bad,' and limit my vision."-- In Dubious Battle

User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21687
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Simple Torture »

Bammer wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
Bammer wrote:
elliseamos wrote:F that! Didn't ACB take like 27 days?!

Michelle Obama to the court for the win!
I honestly don’t know so I am asking: Does Michelle Obama have the requisite law degree or whatever other qualifications are necessary?

(I have no idea what qualifications are necessary)
I believe that technically no qualifications are necessary.
Wow, now that is really something.
Recall that W nominated someone who had never served as a judge (Harriet Miers), although she withdrew before any formal proceedings took place.
McParadigm wrote:lol
User avatar
Simple Torture
I Have A Third Nipple
Posts: 21687
Joined: Tue January 01, 2013 7:41 am
Location: Cumberland, RI

Re: The Supreme Court

Post by Simple Torture »

4/5 wrote:
Bammer wrote:
Simple Torture wrote:
Bammer wrote:
elliseamos wrote:F that! Didn't ACB take like 27 days?!

Michelle Obama to the court for the win!
I honestly don’t know so I am asking: Does Michelle Obama have the requisite law degree or whatever other qualifications are necessary?

(I have no idea what qualifications are necessary)
I believe that technically no qualifications are necessary.
Wow, now that is really something.
The qualification is that a president nominates you and the Senate confirms. Unless the Senate is recessed, in which case the only requirement is that the president nominates you.
So technically the president could nominate bammer.
McParadigm wrote:lol
Post Reply